Literature DB >> 30291109

Role of Cis, Trans, and Inbreeding Effects on Meiotic Recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Xavier Raffoux1, Mickael Bourge2, Fabrice Dumas1, Olivier C Martin1, Matthieu Falque3.   

Abstract

Meiotic recombination is a major driver of genome evolution by creating new genetic combinations. To probe the factors driving variability of meiotic recombination, we used a high-throughput method to measure recombination rates in hybrids between SK1 and a total of 26 Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from different geographic origins and habitats. Fourteen intervals were monitored for each strain, covering chromosomes VI and XI entirely, and part of chromosome I. We found an average number of crossovers per chromosome ranging between 1.0 and 9.5 across strains ("domesticated" or not), which is higher than the average between 0.5 and 1.5 found in most organisms. In the different intervals analyzed, recombination showed up to ninefold variation across strains but global recombination landscapes along chromosomes varied less. We also built an incomplete diallel experiment to measure recombination rates in one region of chromosome XI in 10 different crosses involving five parental strains. Our overall results indicate that recombination rate is increasingly positively correlated with sequence similarity between homologs (i) in DNA double-strand-break-rich regions within intervals, (ii) in entire intervals, and (iii) at the whole genome scale. Therefore, these correlations cannot be explained by cis effects only. We also estimated that cis and trans effects explained 38 and 17%, respectively, of the variance of recombination rate. In addition, by using a quantitative genetics analysis, we identified an inbreeding effect that reduces recombination rate in homozygous genotypes, while other interaction effects (specific combining ability) or additive effects (general combining ability) are found to be weak. Finally, we measured significant crossover interference in some strains, and interference intensity was positively correlated with crossover number.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crossovers; diversity; heterozygosity; interference; meiosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30291109      PMCID: PMC6283170          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  2 in total

Review 1.  Crossover Interference: Shedding Light on the Evolution of Recombination.

Authors:  Sarah P Otto; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 16.830

2.  Loss of heterozygosity results in rapid but variable genome homogenization across yeast genetic backgrounds.

Authors:  Abhishek Dutta; Fabien Dutreux; Joseph Schacherer
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 8.713

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.