| Literature DB >> 30290799 |
Yared Debebe1, Sharon R Hill2, Habte Tekie1, Rickard Ignell3, Richard J Hopkins4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding the ecology of exophilic anophelines is a key step toward developing outdoor control strategies to complement existing indoor control tools against malaria vectors. This study was conducted to assess the movement pattern of exophilic Anopheles mosquitoes between blood meal sources and resting habitats, and the landscape factors dictating their resting habitat choice.Entities:
Keywords: Anopheles; Canopy; Exophilic; Land cover; Landscape
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30290799 PMCID: PMC6173902 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2499-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Maps showing a district map of Ethiopia indicating the Gamo-Gofa zone; b the Gamo-Gofa zone indicating Arba Minch Zuria district; and c the study area with the sampling points
Fig. 2Schematic representation of the clay pot arrangement for collecting outdoor resting Anopheles mosquitoes (a) and a resting clay pot (b)
Fig. 3Proportion of different physiological states of Anopheles mosquitoes caught in clay pots distributed amongst different land cover types
The effect of landscape characteristics within a 10 m radius of the sampling points on the number of Anopheles mosquitoes caught in resting clay pots, as shown by zero-inflated negative binomial regression, followed by backward selection of non-significant independent variables
| Variables | Estimate | Std. error | z value | Pr(> |z|) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | ||||
| Count model coefficients (negbin with log link) | ||||
| (Intercept) | − 1.2435 | 0.6274 | − 1.982 | 0.04747* |
| Distance to nearest dwelling (m) | 0.0136 | 0.0052 | 2.599 | 0.0094** |
| Percent canopy cover | 0.0238 | 0.0068 | 3.483 | 0.0005*** |
| Zero-inflation model coefficients (binomial with logit link) | ||||
| (Intercept) | 1.3602 | 0.6274 | 1.640 | 0.1010 |
| Distance to nearest dwelling (m) | − 0.0016 | 0.0087 | − 0.185 | 0.8530 |
| Percent canopy cover | − 0.0279 | 0.0094 | − 2.963 | 0.0030** |
| Males | ||||
| Count model coefficients (negbin with log link) | ||||
| (Intercept) | − 1.4289 | 1.2516 | − 1.142 | 0.2536 |
| Percent canopy cover | 0.0215 | 0.0151 | 1.420 | 0.1555 |
| Percent ground vegetation | − 0.0386 | 0.0231 | − 1.672 | 0.0946 |
| Zero-inflation model coefficients (binomial with logit link) | ||||
| (Intercept) | 2.5915 | 1.5563 | 1.665 | 0.0959 |
| Percent canopy cover | − 0.0432 | 0.0290 | − 1.490 | 0.1361 |
| Percent ground vegetation | 0.0075 | 0.0503 | 0.149 | 0.8819 |
negbin negative binomial, log link logarithmic link, logit link logistic link
* P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 4Mean number of Anopheles mosquitoes caught in the resting clay pots in different land cover types
The effect of categorical variables within a 10 m radius of the sampling points on the number of Anopheles mosquitoes caught in resting clay pots, as shown by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Wilcoxon pair wise comparison method
| Category | Number | Density of mosquitoes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | ||
| Land cover | |||
| Banana | 69 | 0.72a | 4.04a |
| Bare | 12 | 0.08b | 0.33b |
| Cotton | 5 | 0.00b | 0.00b |
| Grass | 12 | 0.00b | 0.33b |
| Maize | 29 | 0.17ab | 1.24b |
| Mixed | 51 | 0.21ab | 0.51b |
| Ploughed | 13 | 0.00b | 0.15b |
| Shrub | 9 | 0.00b | 0.22b |
| P-value | 0.002 | 0.000 | |
| Shading | |||
| Open | 85 | 0.04a | 0.14a |
| Partial | 41 | 0.12a | 1.29b |
| Shaded | 74 | 0.80b | 3.89c |
| P-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Distance category | |||
| Within 5 m | 40 | 0.3 | 0.32a |
| Within 25 m | 40 | 0.13 | 0.73ac |
| Within 50 m | 40 | 0.25 | 2.15bc |
| Within 75 m | 40 | 0.57 | 2.55b |
| Within 100 m | 40 | 0.43 | 3.08b |
| P-value | 0.429 | 0.0115 | |
abcValues within each category in the same column, followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P > 0.05)
The effect of percentage canopy cover within a 10 m radius of the sampling points on the presence or absence of Anopheles mosquitoes in resting clay pots, as shown by binary logistic regression
| Variables | Estimate | Std. error | z value | Pr(> |z|) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | − 2.3495 | 0.3633 | − 6.466 | 0.0011*** |
| Percent canopy cover | 0.0377 | 0.0059 | 6.389 | 0.00003*** |
Fig. 5Estimated probability of catching at least one single Anopheles mosquito in relation to percent canopy coverage