Literature DB >> 30289737

Returning Results to Family Members: Professional Duties in Genomics Research in the United States.

Dov Fox, Emily Spencer, Ali Torkamani.   

Abstract

This article critically appraises the ethical and legal duties to disclose findings to the family members of research participants. These family members stand to benefit in important ways from discoveries that can inform their own health and reproductive risks. However, careful appreciation of how medical research differs from clinical practice and of the uncertainties at stake in genomic research complicates any warning to relatives. Research laboratories should generally be immune from liability for failing to diagnose or disclose a genetic disorder in time to prevent adverse outcomes for a participant's family members or to return properly interpreted test results for even direct findings under investigation, let alone incidental ones. The only exception is where warning relatives of medical risks is very likely to prevent imminent harm and would not override known participant wishes. Genomic autopsy studies for sudden death satisfy these conditions of life-saving potential for relatives without disrespect to subjects. These are among the rare instances in which we conclude that offering results to family members is not just permissible but obligatory, not just as a moral matter but as a legal one.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30289737     DOI: 10.1080/01947648.2017.1417934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Leg Med        ISSN: 0194-7648


  5 in total

1.  "If relatives inherited the gene, they should inherit the data." Bringing the family into the room where bioethics happens.

Authors:  Deborah R Gordon; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2021-12-13

2.  2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.

Authors:  Martin K Stiles; Arthur A M Wilde; Dominic J Abrams; Michael J Ackerman; Christine M Albert; Elijah R Behr; Sumeet S Chugh; Martina C Cornel; Karen Gardner; Jodie Ingles; Cynthia A James; Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang; Stefan Kääb; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Andrew D Krahn; Steven A Lubitz; Heather MacLeod; Carlos A Morillo; Koonlawee Nademanee; Vincent Probst; Elizabeth V Saarel; Luciana Sacilotto; Christopher Semsarian; Mary N Sheppard; Wataru Shimizu; Jonathan R Skinner; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen; Dao Wu Wang
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.

Authors:  Martin K Stiles; Arthur A M Wilde; Dominic J Abrams; Michael J Ackerman; Christine M Albert; Elijah R Behr; Sumeet S Chugh; Martina C Cornel; Karen Gardner; Jodie Ingles; Cynthia A James; Jyh-Ming Jimmy Juang; Stefan Kääb; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Andrew D Krahn; Steven A Lubitz; Heather MacLeod; Carlos A Morillo; Koonlawee Nademanee; Vincent Probst; Elizabeth V Saarel; Luciana Sacilotto; Christopher Semsarian; Mary N Sheppard; Wataru Shimizu; Jonathan R Skinner; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen; Dao Wu Wang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-04-08

4.  Perspectives and ethical considerations for return of genetics and genomics research results: a qualitative study of genomics researchers in Uganda.

Authors:  Joseph Ochieng; Betty Kwagala; John Barugahare; Erisa Mwaka; Deborah Ekusai-Sebatta; Joseph Ali; Nelson K Sewankambo
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  A genetic researcher's devil's dilemma: Warn relatives about their genetic risk or respect confidentiality agreements with research participants?

Authors:  Els L M Maeckelberghe; M Corrette Ploem; Imke Christiaans; Lieke M van den Heuvel
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.652

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.