Background: In older persons, muscle loss is accelerated during physical inactivity and hypoenergetic states, both of which are features of hospitalization. Protein supplementation may represent a strategy to offset the loss of muscle during inactivity, and enhance recovery on resumption of activity. Objective: We aimed to determine if protein supplementation, with proteins of substantially different quality, would alleviate the loss of lean mass by augmenting muscle protein synthesis (MPS) while inactive during a hypoenergetic state. Design: Participants (16 men, mean ±SD age: 69 ± 3 y; 15 women, mean ±SD age: 68 ± 4 y) consumed a diet containing 1.6 g protein · kg-1 · d-1, with 55% ± 9% of protein from foods and 45% ± 9% from supplements, namely, whey protein (WP) or collagen peptides (CP): 30 g each, consumed 2 times/d. Participants were in energy balance (EB) for 1 wk, then began a period of energy restriction (ER; -500 kcal/d) for 1 wk, followed by ER with step reduction (ER + SR; <750 steps/d) for 2 wk, before a return to habitual activity in recovery (RC) for 1 wk. Results: There were significant reductions in leg lean mass (LLM) from EB to ER, and from ER to ER + SR in both groups (P < 0.001) with no differences between WP and CP or when comparing the change from phase to phase. During RC, LLM increased from ER + SR, but in the WP group only. Rates of integrated muscle protein synthesis decreased during ER and ER + SR in both groups (P < 0.01), but increased during RC only in the WP group (P = 0.05). Conclusions: Protein supplementation did not confer a benefit in protecting LLM, but only supplemental WP augmented LLM and muscle protein synthesis during recovery from inactivity and a hypoenergetic state. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03285737.
RCT Entities:
Background: In older persons, muscle loss is accelerated during physical inactivity and hypoenergetic states, both of which are features of hospitalization. Protein supplementation may represent a strategy to offset the loss of muscle during inactivity, and enhance recovery on resumption of activity. Objective: We aimed to determine if protein supplementation, with proteins of substantially different quality, would alleviate the loss of lean mass by augmenting muscle protein synthesis (MPS) while inactive during a hypoenergetic state. Design: Participants (16 men, mean ± SD age: 69 ± 3 y; 15 women, mean ± SD age: 68 ± 4 y) consumed a diet containing 1.6 g protein · kg-1 · d-1, with 55% ± 9% of protein from foods and 45% ± 9% from supplements, namely, whey protein (WP) or collagen peptides (CP): 30 g each, consumed 2 times/d. Participants were in energy balance (EB) for 1 wk, then began a period of energy restriction (ER; -500 kcal/d) for 1 wk, followed by ER with step reduction (ER + SR; <750 steps/d) for 2 wk, before a return to habitual activity in recovery (RC) for 1 wk. Results: There were significant reductions in leg lean mass (LLM) from EB to ER, and from ER to ER + SR in both groups (P < 0.001) with no differences between WP and CP or when comparing the change from phase to phase. During RC, LLM increased from ER + SR, but in the WP group only. Rates of integrated muscle protein synthesis decreased during ER and ER + SR in both groups (P < 0.01), but increased during RC only in the WP group (P = 0.05). Conclusions: Protein supplementation did not confer a benefit in protecting LLM, but only supplemental WP augmented LLM and muscle protein synthesis during recovery from inactivity and a hypoenergetic state. This trial was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03285737.
Authors: Sara Y Oikawa; Michael J Kamal; Erin K Webb; Chris McGlory; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sara Y Oikawa; Damien M Callahan; Chris McGlory; Michael J Toth; Stuart M Phillips Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: Michael J Toth; Patrick D Savage; Thomas B Voigt; Bradley M Anair; Janice Y Bunn; Isaac B Smith; Timothy W Tourville; Michael Blankstein; Jennifer Stevens-Lapsley; Nathaniel J Nelms Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2022-07-28
Authors: Ziad S Mahmassani; Alec I McKenzie; Jonathan J Petrocelli; Naomi M de Hart; Dennis K Fix; Joshua J Kelly; Lisa M Baird; Michael T Howard; Micah J Drummond Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 6.591
Authors: James McKendry; Brad S Currier; Changhyun Lim; Jonathan C Mcleod; Aaron C Q Thomas; Stuart M Phillips Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-07-10 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: M S Brook; P Scaife; J J Bass; J Cegielski; S Watanabe; D J Wilkinson; K Smith; B E Phillips; P J Atherton Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 7.324