Literature DB >> 30288849

Postablation cerebral embolisms in balloon-based atrial fibrillation ablation with periprocedural direct oral anticoagulants: A comparison between cryoballoon and HotBalloon ablation.

Kohki Nakamura1, Takehito Sasaki1, Yutaka Take1, Yoshinori Okazaki1, Mitsuho Inoue1, Hiroyuki Motoda1, Yuko Miki1, Katsura Niijima1, Eiji Yamashita1, Keiko Koyama2, Nobusada Funabashi3, Shigeto Naito1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the incidence of symptomatic and silent cerebral embolisms after balloon-based ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients receiving periprocedural anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), and compare that between cryoballoon and HotBalloon ablation (CBA and HBA). METHODS AND
RESULTS: We enrolled 123 consecutive AF patients who underwent a balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging after the ablation procedure (CBA, n = 65; HBA, n = 58). The DOACs were continued in 62 patients throughout the periprocedural period and discontinued in 61 on the procedural day. Intravenous heparin was infused to maintain an activated clotting time of 300 to 400 seconds during the procedure. No symptomatic embolisms occurred in this series. Silent cerebral ischemic lesions (SCILs) were observed on MR imaging in 22 patients (17.9%), and the incidence of SCILs did not significantly differ between the CBA and HBA groups (21.5 vs 13.8%; P = 0.263). According to a multivariate logistic regression analysis, an older age was an independent positive predictor of SCILs (odds ratio, 1.062; 95% CI, 1.001-1.126; P = 0.046), but neither the balloon catheter type nor periprocedural continuation or discontinuation of the DOACs were significant predictors. The incidence of major and minor bleeding complications was comparable between the CBA and HBA groups (1.5 vs 0%, P = 0.528; 7.7 vs 5.2%, P = 0.424).
CONCLUSIONS: Both CBA and HBA of AF revealed a similar incidence of postablation cerebral embolisms. Elderly patients may be at a risk of SCILs after a balloon-based PVI with periprocedural DOAC treatment.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HotBalloon; atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; cryoballoon; direct oral anticoagulant; embolism

Year:  2018        PMID: 30288849     DOI: 10.1111/jce.13762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  3 in total

1.  Safety, effectiveness, and quality of life following pulmonary vein isolation with a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon catheter in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes from SHINE.

Authors:  Richard Schilling; Gurpreet Singh Dhillon; Claudio Tondo; Stefania Riva; Massimo Grimaldi; Federico Quadrini; Petr Neuzil; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Carlo de Asmundis; Ahmed Abdelaal; Liesbeth Vanderlinden; Tiffany Tan; Wern Yew Ding; Dhiraj Gupta; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.214

2.  Outcomes of uninterrupted vs interrupted Periprocedural direct oral Anticoagulants in atrial Fibrillation ablation: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Indranill Basu-Ray; Dibbendhu Khanra; Péter Kupó; Jared Bunch; Sue A Theus; Anindya Mukherjee; Sumit K Shah; András Komócsi; Adedayo Adeboye; John Jefferies
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-01-29

3.  Effects of Hot Balloon vs. Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.

Authors:  Xinyi Peng; Xiao Liu; Hongbo Tian; Yu Chen; Xuexun Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.