| Literature DB >> 30288479 |
Tian-Qi Zhang1, Qun-Qing Su1, Xiao-Ying Huang1, Jin-Guang Yao1,2, Chao Wang3, Qiang Xia4, Xi-Dai Long1,4, Yun Ma5.
Abstract
Our previous reports have shown that microRNA-4651 is a potential early diagnostic and prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to investigate whether microRNA-4651 modified postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (pa-TACE) to improve the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. A hospital-based retrospective study, including 302 patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma who received tumor resection or tumor resection plus pa-TACE as an initial therapy, was conducted to assess the effects of microRNA-4651 on pa-TACE treatment. MicroRNA-4651 expression in tumor tissues was tested using the TaqMan-PCR technique. The sensitivity of tumor cells to doxorubicin (an anticancer drug used in pa-TACE procedure) was analyzed by the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). Upregulated microRNA-4651 expression in tumor tissues can improve the therapeutic response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma on pa-TACE (hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] = 0.32 [0.22-0.46] for death risk and 0.39 [0.28-0.56] for tumor-recurrence risk, respectively), but downregulated expression cannot. Functional analyses-displayed microRNA-4651 mimics decreased while its inhibitor increased the IC50 of tumor cells to doxorubicin (0.65 [0.61-0.69] versus 2.17 [1.98-2.37] µM). Cytochrome P450 2W1 was shown as a possible target of microRNA-4651. Additionally, dysregulation of microRNA-4651 also affected the clinical pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma and was an independent prognostic factor for this cancer.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30288479 PMCID: PMC6167067 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1245
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hepatol Commun ISSN: 2471-254X
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Cases With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
| Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in the Present Study |
|---|
| Inclusion criteria for cases |
| (1) Cases with a pathologically diagnosed and BCLC C‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma |
| (2) Cases receiving partial liver resect or partial liver resect plus pa‐TACE as initial treatment according to CMCH (solitary or multiple tumors mainly located in one lobe of the liver; no extrahepatic metastases; Child‐Pugh A‐stage liver function; and no contraindication for laparotomy) |
| (3) Cases not receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgical operative treatment |
| (4) Cases understanding the objective of the study and providing informed consent |
| (5) Cases having ability to complete the necessary investigations and questionnaires |
| (6) Cases with available cancerous tissue samples and clinical‐pathological data (including 5‐year follow‐up data) |
| Exclusion criteria for cases |
| (1) Cases with hepatocellular carcinoma but not confirmed by histopathological examination |
| (2) Cases receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgical operative treatment |
| (3) Cases rejected, dropped out, or lost information |
| Inclusion criteria for TACE analysis |
| (1) Cases with a pathologically diagnosed and BCLC C‐stage hepatocarcinoma |
| (2) Cases having good liver function (Child‐Pugh stage A) |
| (3) Cases with multiple tumors more than 5 cm or tumor involving a first or second branch of the portal or hepatic veins |
| (4) The tumor with multiple lesions localized in one lobe of liver, or the main tumor localized in one lobe only with a small solitary lesion in contralateral lobe, or tumor involving a first or second branch of the portal or hepatic vein, which could be safely resected without grossly remaining tumors, and the patient was judged to have well preserved liver function to survive the operation |
| (5) Cases underwent partial hepatectomy, and agreed to pa‐TACE treatment |
| (6) Cases without contraindication for TACE |
| Exclusion criteria for TACE analysis |
| (1) Patients with non‐hepatocarcinoma on postoperative histopathological examination, serious concurrent medical illness, intractable ascites, tumor recurrence within 4 works after the operation |
| (2) Women cases who were pregnant or breastfeeding |
| (3) Cases rejected, dropped out, or lost information |
| (4) Cases with contraindication for TACE |
| (5) Cases with history of chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment before surgical operative treatment |
Abbreviations: BCLC, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system; CMCH, Chinese Manage Criteria of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Clinical Pathological Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cases With or Without pa‐TACE Treatment
| pa‐TACE treatment, n (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Cases, n (%) | No | Yes | χ2 |
| ||
| Total | 302 (100.0) | 152 (100.0) | 150 (100.0) | ||||
| Age (years) | 0.32 | 0.57 | |||||
| ≤48 | 172 (57.0) | 89 (58.6) | 83 (55.3) | ||||
| > 48 | 130 (43.0) | 63 (41.4) | 67 (44.7) | ||||
| Sex | 1.39 | 0.24 | |||||
| Male | 201 (66.6) | 106 (69.7) | 95 (63.3) | ||||
| Female | 101 (33.4) | 46 (30.3) | 55 (36.7) | ||||
| Ethnicity | 2.58 | 0.11 | |||||
| Han | 163 (54.0) | 89 (58.6) | 74 (49.3) | ||||
| Zhuang | 139 (46.0) | 63 (41.4) | 76 (50.7) | ||||
| HBsAg | 1.14 | 0.29 | |||||
| Negative | 96 (31.8) | 44 (28.9) | 52 (34.7) | ||||
| Positive | 206 (68.2) | 108 (71.1) | 98 (65.3) | ||||
| anti‐HCV | 1.77 | 0.18 | |||||
| Negative | 269 (89.1) | 139 (91.4) | 130 (86.7) | ||||
| Positive | 33 (10.9) | 13 (8.6) | 20 (13.3) | ||||
| Smoking status | 0.12 | 0.73 | |||||
| No | 231 (76.5) | 115 (75.7) | 116 (77.3) | ||||
| Yes | 71 (33.5) | 37 (24.3) | 34 (22.7) | ||||
| Drinking status | 2.28 | 0.13 | |||||
| No | 224 (74.2) | 117 (70.4) | 117 (78.0) | ||||
| Yes | 78 (25.8) | 45 (29.6) | 33 (22.0) | ||||
| AFP (ng/mL) | 0.53 | 0.47 | |||||
| ≤20 | 111 (36.8) | 54 (35.5) | 57 (38.0) | ||||
| > 20 | 191 (63.2) | 98 (64.5) | 93 (62.0) | ||||
| Liver cirrhosis | 0.11 | 0.74 | |||||
| No | 74 (24.5) | 36 (23.7) | 38 (25.3) | ||||
| Yes | 228 (75.5) | 116 (66.3) | 112 (74.7) | ||||
| ES grade | 0.66 | 0.42 | |||||
| Low | 160 (53.0) | 77 (50.7) | 83 (55.3) | ||||
| High | 142 (47.0) | 75 (49.3) | 67 (44.47) | ||||
| MVD | 0.02 | 0.88 | |||||
| Low | 106 (35.1) | 54 (35.5) | 52 (34.7) | ||||
| High | 196 (64.9) | 98 (64.5) | 98 (65.3) | ||||
*Age is grouped according to the average age of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (48.01 ± 10.03 years).
Figure 1TACE treatment significantly correlates with hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis. TACE treatment is associated with OS (left) and tumor RFS (right) of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cumulative hazard function was plotted by Kaplan‐Meier's methodology, and the P value was calculated with two‐sided log‐rank tests. Abbreviations: MRT, median tumor recurrence‐free survival time; MST, median overall survival time.
Correlation Between miR‐4651 Expression and Clinical Pathological Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
| MiR‐4651 Expression, n (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Low | High | OR (95% CI) |
|
| Total | 124 (100%) | 178 (100%) | ||
| Age (years) | ||||
| ≤48 | 72 (58.1) | 100 (56.2) | Reference | |
| > 48 | 52 (41.9) | 78 (43.8) | 1.04 (0.65‐1.67) | 0.86 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 84 (67.7) | 117 (65.7) | Reference | |
| Female | 40 (32.3) | 61 (34.3) | 1.09 (0.67‐1.78) | 0.73 |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| Han | 62 (50.0) | 101 (56.7) | Reference | |
| Zhuang | 62 (50.0) | 77 (43.3) | 0.77 (0.48‐1.22) | 0.26 |
| HBsAg | ||||
| Negative | 41 (33.1) | 55 (30.9) | Reference | |
| Positive | 83 (66.9) | 123 (69.1) | 1.15 (0.70‐1.88) | 0.59 |
| anti‐HCV | ||||
| Negative | 113 (91.1) | 156 (87.6) | Reference | |
| Positive | 11 (8.9) | 11 (12.4) | 1.49 (0.69‐3.21) | 0.31 |
| Smoking status | ||||
| No | 94 (75.8) | 137 (77.0) | Reference | |
| Yes | 30 (24.2) | 41 (23.0) | 0.94 (0.55‐1.61) | 0.82 |
| Drinking status | ||||
| No | 93 (75.0) | 131 (73.6) | Reference | |
| Yes | 31 (25.0) | 47 (26.4) | 1.05 (0.62‐1.79) | 0.85 |
| AFP (ng/mL) | ||||
| ≤20 | 58 (46.8) | 53 (29.8) | Reference | |
| > 20 | 66 (53.2) | 125 (70.2) | 2.07 (1.28‐3.34) | 2.83 × 10–3 |
| Liver cirrhosis | ||||
| No | 33 (26.6) | 41 (23.0) | Reference | |
| Yes | 91 (73.4) | 137 (77.0) | 1.26 (0.74‐2.15) | 0.40 |
| ES grade | ||||
| Low grade | 82 (66.1) | 78 (43.8) | Reference | |
| High grade | 42 (33.9) | 100 (56.2) | 2.46 (1.52‐3.96) | 2.26 × 10–4 |
| MVD | ||||
| Low | 63 (50.8) | 43 (24.2) | Reference | |
| High | 61 (49.2) | 135 (75.8) | 3.20 (1.96‐5.24) | 3.69 × 10–6 |
Figure 2The miR‐4651 expression is significantly associated with the differentiation and MVD of hepatocellular carcinoma. The miR‐4651 expression in cancerous tissues from 302 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma was tested using the TaqMan‐PCR technique. To analyze, the levels of miR‐4651 expression were divided into two groups: low expression group (relative level ≤ 2) and high expression group (relative level > 2), according to the average expression. The levels of miR‐4651 expression in the cancerous tissues are positively correlated with the degree of differentiation (A) and MVD (B) of the tumor. Abbreviations: HG, high differentiation grade; HM, high MVD; LG, low differentiation grade; LM, low MVD.
Figure 3miR‐4651 expression significantly correlated with the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. miR‐4651 expression is associated with the OS (left) and tumor RFS (right) of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cumulative hazard function was plotted by Kaplan‐Meier's methodology, and the P value was calculated with two‐sided log‐rank tests. Abbreviations: MRT, median tumor recurrence‐free survival time; MST, median overall survival time.
Univariate Analyses Identifying miR‐4651 Expression as One of the Significant Prognostic Predictors for Survival of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
| OS | RFS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
|
| Age (48 vs. < 48 years) | 0.91 (0.71‐1.17) | 0.47 | 0.93 (0.72‐1.19) | 0.56 |
| Gender (female vs. male) | 0.90 (0.69‐1.16) | 0.42 | 0.87 (0.67‐1.14) | 0.32 |
| Ethnicity (minority vs. Han) | 0.81 (0.63‐1.04) | 0.10 | 0.83 (0.64‐1.06) | 0.14 |
| Smoking (yes vs. no) | 0.78 (0.58‐1.05) | 0.78 | 0.78 (0.58‐1.04) | 0.10 |
| Drinking (yes vs. no) | 0.94 (0.71‐1.26) | 0.94 | 0.88 (0.66‐1.17) | 0.37 |
| HBsAg (positive vs. negative) | 1.27 (0.96‐1.68) | 0.10 | 1.13 (0.85‐1.45) | 0.18 |
| anti‐HCV (positive vs. negative) | 1.00 (0.67‐1.49) | 0.98 | 1.01 (0.68‐1.19) | 0.97 |
| AFP (≤ 20 vs. > 20 ng/mL) | 1.19 (0.92‐1.55) | 0.19 | 1.26 (0.98‐1.64) | 0.08 |
| Liver cirrhosis (yes vs. no) | 1.24 (0.92‐1.67) | 0.16 | 1.13 (0.85‐1.52) | 0.40 |
| ES grade (high vs. low) | 1.61 (1.25‐2.08) | 2.10 × 10–4 | 1.58 (1.23‐2.03) | 3.58 × 10–4 |
| MVD (high vs. low) | 1.48 (1.13‐1.94) | 4.08 × 10–3 | 1.39 (1.09‐1.68) | 0.04 |
| pa‐TACE treatment (no vs. yes) | 0.57 (0.44‐0.73) | 1.14 × 10–5 | 0.58 (0.45‐0.74) | 2.04 × 10–5 |
| MiR‐4651 expression (high vs. low) | 2.80 (2.13‐3.68) | 1.58 × 10–13 | 2.39 (1.83‐3.13) | 1.59 × 10–10 |
Independent Prognostic Factors of OS and RFS for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Multivariate Analyses
| Variables | OS | RFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Age (48 vs. < 48 years) | 0.79 (0.70‐1.22) | 0.58 | 0.89 (0.67‐1.16) | 0.38 |
| Gender (female vs. male) | 0.92 (060‐1.04) | 0.10 | 0.88 (0.67‐1.17) | 0.39 |
| Ethnicity (minority vs. Han) | 0.84 (0.64‐1.11) | 0.22 | 0.86 (0.66‐1.13) | 0.28 |
| Smoking (yes vs. no) | 1.32 (0.98‐1.79) | 0.07 | 0.85 (0.58‐1.25) | 0.42 |
| Drinking (yes vs. no) | 0.71 (0.46‐1.10) | 0.12 | 0.84 (0.58‐1.26) | 0.38 |
| HBsAg (positive vs. negative) | 0.79 (0.54‐1.16) | 0.23 | 1.13 (0.85‐1.51) | 0.41 |
| anti‐HCV (positive vs. negative) | 1.00 (0.68‐1.46) | 0.99 | 0.77 (0.51‐1.18) | 0.23 |
| AFP (≤ 20 vs. > 20 ng/mL) | 0.95 (0.72‐1.25) | 0.73 | 1.06 (0.81‐1.39) | 0.69 |
| Liver cirrhosis (yes vs. no) | 1.01 (0.73‐1.38) | 0.98 | 0.94 (0.70‐1.28) | 0.71 |
| ES grade (high vs. low) | 1.45 (1.10‐1.92) | 7.91 × 10–3 | 1.48 (1.12‐1.94) | 5.16 × 10–3 |
| MVD (high vs. low) | 2.28 (1.95‐2.73) | 1.09 × 10–4 | 1.94 (1.53‐2.49) | 0.03 |
| pa‐TACE treatment (no vs. yes) | 0.52 (0.39‐0.68) | 3.39 × 10–6 | 0.58 (0.44‐0.76) | 7.17 × 10–5 |
| MiR‐4651 expression (high vs. low) | 2.79 (2.07‐3.77) | 2.54 × 10–11 | 2.30 (1.73‐3.07) | 1.46 × 10–8 |
Figure 4Survival analysis of TACE treatment in the strata of miR‐4651 expression. Among the hepatocellular carcinoma cases with high miR‐4651 expression, TACE treatment improved hepatocellular carcinoma OS and tumor RFS (A), but not among patients with low miR‐4651 expression (B). Cumulative hazard function was plotted using Kaplan‐Meier's methodology, and the P value was calculated with two‐sided log‐rank tests. Abbreviations: MRT, median tumor recurrence‐free survival time; MST, median overall survival time.
MicroRNA‐4651 Expression and Adverse Reactions Induced by pa‐TACE Treatment
| Adverse Reaction | Grade of Adverse Reactions (nHMRE/nLMRE) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| G‐1 | G‐2 | G‐3 |
| |
| Nausea/vomiting | 31/28 | 3/5 | 0/0 | 0.62/0.72/– |
| Pain | 12/10 | 2/4 | 0/0 | 0.64/0.68/– |
| Alopecia | 3/3 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 1.00/–/– |
| Leukopenia | 2/2 | 1/1 | 0/0 | 1.00/1.00/– |
| Increase in ALT/AST | 21/22 | 10/7 | 7/10 | 0.86/0.44/0.44 |
| Increase in GGT | 10/13 | 6/4 | 0/0 | 0.29/0.51/– |
| Decrease in albumin | 4/2 | 0/0 | 0/0 | 0.68/–/– |
| Increase in bilirubin | 13/9 | 8/5 | 0/0 | 0.36/0.38/– |
Abbreviations:ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; GGT, γ‐glutamyl transpeptidase; nHMRE/nLMRE, number of hepatocarcinoma patients with HMRE/ number of hepatocarcinoma patients with LMRE; P G‐1/P G‐2/P G‐3, P value for distribution different of the first‐grade adverse reaction between patients with HMRE and with LMRE/P value for distribution different from the second‐grade adverse reaction between patients with HMRE and with LMRE/P value for distribution different from the third‐grade adverse reaction between patients with HMRE and with LMRE.
Figure 5The miR‐4651 expression‐modifying effects of doxorubicin treatment on hepatocellular carcinoma cells SMMC‐7721 in vitro. SMMC‐7721 cells were transfected with normal saline (Control), miR‐4651 mimics (miR‐4651), or miR‐4651's inhibitor (Inhibitor). The sensitivity of cells to doxorubicin was evaluated by IC50. IC50 values were calculated by nonlinear regression analysis using the GraphPad Prism software Version 6.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Abbreviations: DOX, doxorubicin.
Figure 6The miR‐4651 expression‐modifying doxorubicin‐induced death of hepatocellular carcinoma cells SMMC‐7721 in vitro. SMMC‐7721 cells were transfected with normal saline (Control), mature miR‐4651 mimics (miR‐4651), or miR‐4651's inhibitor (Inhibitor). (A) TUNEL staining was used to analyze the doxorubicin‐induced cell deaths. In the fluorescence microscopy, cells (including live and nonlive cells) exhibited red fluorescent, whereas death cells exhibited green fluorescent. TUNEL‐positive cells (green) were counted in at least 300 cells in randomly chosen fields. The data were expressed as a percentage of TUNEL‐positive cells to total cells and analyzed using one‐way ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction. (B) The representative fluorescent plots showed the effects of miR‐4651 on doxorubicin‐induced cell deaths. (C) Flow cytometry analyses were used to analyze the effects of miR‐4651 on doxorubicin‐induced cell death.
Figure 7CYP2W1 expression significantly correlated with miR‐4651 in the hepatocellular carcinoma cells SMMC‐7721 in vitro. (A) Relative expression changes in the top 30 expressed genes as SMMC‐7721 cells transfected with mature miR‐4651 mimics or its null control. The relative different scores of gene expression in miR‐4651 relative to control were calculated using the Bio‐Array Environment software. (B) Relative expression of CYP2W1 mRNA was tested using the real‐time quantitative PCR method, and data were analyzed using one‐way ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction. (C) The level of CYP2W1 protein was tested using western blot analysis (left). The relative level of protein was calculated using the corresponding gray value relative to the control's, and data were analyzed using one‐way ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction (right).