Literature DB >> 30287998

Identification of Sentinel Lymph Nodes Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Breast Cancer.

Naresh Kumar Saidha1, Rohit Aggarwal1, Arijit Sen1.   

Abstract

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has become the standard of care in axillary staging of breast cancer patients who are clinically node negative as it reduces the morbidity of axillary nodal dissection. SLN biopsy using blue dye and radioisotopes have high identification rates but its limitations include anaphylaxis, disposal of radioactive waste, and potential second surgery in up to 35% of patients who show nodal metastases on SLN biopsy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has the potential for SLNs to be identified without the aforementioned risks. CEUS involves the administration of intravenous contrast agents containing microbubbles of perfluorocarbon or nitrogen gas. The bubbles greatly affect ultrasound backscatter and increase vascular contrast in a similar manner to intravenous contrast agents used in CT and MRI. It is safe and easily performed with no requirement for ionizing radiation and no risk of nephrotoxicity. Microbubbles are taken up by lymph nodes when injected directly into tissues, including sub-areolar injection in the breast cancer patient. This method may prove valuable in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ, where operative SLN biopsy remains controversial, and in women undergoing prophylactic mastectomies for high risk. This technique may also have a role after neoadjuvant chemotherapy where frequently there is fibrosis in the treated SLNs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Sentinel node biopsy

Year:  2017        PMID: 30287998      PMCID: PMC6154376          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-017-0646-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  19 in total

1.  The sentinel node and breast cancer.

Authors:  U Veronesi
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Lessons learned from 500 cases of lymphatic mapping for breast cancer.

Authors:  A D Hill; K N Tran; T Akhurst; H Yeung; S D Yeh; P P Rosen; P I Borgen; H S Cody
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Allergic reactions to isosulfan blue during sentinel node biopsy--a common event.

Authors:  V M Cimmino; A C Brown; J F Szocik; H A Pass; S Moline; S K De; E F Domino
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Prospective evaluation of the morbidity of axillary clearance for breast cancer.

Authors:  M Duff; A D Hill; G McGreal; S Walsh; E W McDermott; N J O'Higgins
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Significance of axillary lymph node metastasis in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  I Jatoi; S G Hilsenbeck; G M Clark; C K Osborne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Preoperative sentinel node identification with ultrasound using microbubbles in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ali R Sever; Philippa Mills; Susan E Jones; Karina Cox; Jennifer Weeks; David Fish; Peter A Jones
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Viviana Galimberti; Bernard F Cole; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Paola Baratella; Camelia Chifu; Manuela Sargenti; Mattia Intra; Oreste Gentilini; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giovanni Mazzarol; Samuele Massarut; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Janez Zgajnar; Hanne Galatius; Angelo Recalcati; David Littlejohn; Monika Bamert; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Umberto Veronesi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Preoperative localization of sentinel lymph nodes using intradermal microbubbles and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  A Sever; S Jones; K Cox; J Weeks; P Mills; P Jones
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NSABP update.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; D L Wickerham; C K Redmond; E R Fisher; A B Cruz; R Foster; B Gardner; H Lerner; R Margolese
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  4 in total

1.  Ultrasound-guided immunofunctional photoacoustic imaging for diagnosis of lymph node metastases.

Authors:  Diego S Dumani; In-Cheol Sun; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 7.790

2.  Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Value of Tracer Staining Technology Based on Nanocarbon Suspension in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Luhua Xia; Le Chong; Zinan Lu; Xinhua Wang; Zhanfei Dong; Yanping Zhao; Cheng Chang; Gang Sun
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Pharmacokinetic parameters and radiomics model based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for the preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Meijie Liu; Ning Mao; Heng Ma; Jianjun Dong; Kun Zhang; Kaili Che; Shaofeng Duan; Xuexi Zhang; Yinghong Shi; Haizhu Xie
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.909

4.  Diagnostic efficacy of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer under percutaneous contrast-enhanced ultrasound: An updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Huadong Deng; Jianming Lei; Lixian Jin; Hongwei Shi
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.