Literature DB >> 30287491

Variants with increased negative electrostatic potential in the Cx50 gap junction pore increased unitary channel conductance and magnesium modulation.

Mary Grace Tejada1, Swathy Sudhakar1, Nicholas K Kim1, Hiroshi Aoyama2, Brian H Shilton3, Donglin Bai4.   

Abstract

Gap junction (GJ) channels are oligomers of connexins forming channels linking neighboring cells. GJs formed by different connexins show distinct unitary channel conductance (γj), transjunctional voltage-dependent gating (V j-gating) properties, and modulation by intracellular magnesium ([Mg2+]i). The underlying molecular determinants are not fully clear. Previous experimental evidence indicates that residues in the amino terminal (NT) and initial segment of the first extracellular (E1) domain influence the γj, V j-gating, and/or [Mg2+]i modulation in several GJs. Increasing negatively charged residues in Cx50 (connexin50) E1 (G46D or G46E) increased γj, while increasing positively charged residue (G46K) reduced the γj Sequence alignment of Cx50 and Cx37 in the NT and E1 domains revealed that in Cx50 G8 and V53, positions are negatively charged residues in Cx37 (E8 and E53, respectively). To evaluate these residues together, we generated a triple variant in Cx50, G8E, G46E, and V53E simultaneously to study its γj, V j-gating properties, and modulation by [Mg2+]i Our data indicate that the triple variant and individual variants G8E, G46E, and V53E significantly increased Cx50 GJ γj without a significant change in the V j gating. In addition, elevated [Mg2+]i reduced γj in Cx50 and all the variant GJs. These results and our homology structural models suggest that these NT/E1 residues are likely to be pore-lining and the variants increased the negative electrostatic potentials along the GJ pore to facilitate the γj of this cation-preferring GJ channel. Our results indicate that electrostatic properties of the Cx50 GJ pore are important for the γj and the [Mg2+]i modulation.
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Portland Press Limited on behalf of the Biochemical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  [Mg2+]i-dependent modulation; connexin50; gap junction channel; patch clamp; single channel conductance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30287491     DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20180523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  5 in total

1.  Four-State Model for Simulating Kinetic and Steady-State Voltage-Dependent Gating of Gap Junctions.

Authors:  Mindaugas Snipas; Tadas Kraujalis; Kestutis Maciunas; Lina Kraujaliene; Lukas Gudaitis; Vytas K Verselis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  The mutual interplay of redox signaling and connexins.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Qi-Wen Guan; Xin-Yu Zhou; Qin-Xuan Xia; Xi-Xi Yin; Hong-Hao Zhou; Xiao-Yuan Mao
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  The Amino Terminal Domain and Modulation of Connexin36 Gap Junction Channels by Intracellular Magnesium Ions.

Authors:  Tadas Kraujalis; Lukas Gudaitis; Lina Kraujaliene; Mindaugas Snipas; Nicolás Palacios-Prado; Vytas K Verselis
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  The Hydrophobic Residues in Amino Terminal Domains of Cx46 and Cx50 Are Important for Their Gap Junction Channel Ion Permeation and Gating.

Authors:  Roa'a Jaradat; Xiaole Li; Honghong Chen; Peter B Stathopulos; Donglin Bai
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Connexons Coupling to Gap Junction Channel: Potential Role for Extracellular Protein Stabilization Centers.

Authors:  László Héja; Ágnes Simon; Zsolt Szabó; Julianna Kardos
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.