Xiaoshi Yang1, John S Barbieri2, Carrie L Kovarik3. 1. Department of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China; Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: carrie.kovarik@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology (TD) has the potential to increase access to timely, high-quality care for underserved populations. However, the cost-effectiveness of TD for underserved populations is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the potential cost savings associated with an SAF TD program implemented for an underserved population in the city health clinics of urban Philadelphia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of SAF TD consultations for 700 outpatients managed in 12 Philadelphia primary care clinics. Primary care providers were asked to specify a treatment plan, as well as the type of care for the patient, in the absence of the TD service. Analysis compared the cost of each patient case with use of the TD consult model versus with conventional care. RESULTS: In all, 27% of in-person dermatology clinic visits (189 of 700) and 3.29% of emergency room visits (23 of 700) were avoided by using TD. Compared with conventional care, TD had a mean expected cost savings of $10.00 to $52.65 per TD consult. In sensitivity analyses, these estimated savings remained positive across a range of parameters. LIMITATIONS: The cost analysis relies on several assumptions regarding the cost of care, and indirect costs were not included. CONCLUSION: TD can be a cost-saving model while increasing access to dermatologic care.
BACKGROUND: Store-and-forward (SAF) teledermatology (TD) has the potential to increase access to timely, high-quality care for underserved populations. However, the cost-effectiveness of TD for underserved populations is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the potential cost savings associated with an SAF TD program implemented for an underserved population in the city health clinics of urban Philadelphia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of SAF TD consultations for 700 outpatients managed in 12 Philadelphia primary care clinics. Primary care providers were asked to specify a treatment plan, as well as the type of care for the patient, in the absence of the TD service. Analysis compared the cost of each patient case with use of the TD consult model versus with conventional care. RESULTS: In all, 27% of in-person dermatology clinic visits (189 of 700) and 3.29% of emergency room visits (23 of 700) were avoided by using TD. Compared with conventional care, TD had a mean expected cost savings of $10.00 to $52.65 per TD consult. In sensitivity analyses, these estimated savings remained positive across a range of parameters. LIMITATIONS: The cost analysis relies on several assumptions regarding the cost of care, and indirect costs were not included. CONCLUSION:TD can be a cost-saving model while increasing access to dermatologic care.
Authors: Robin H Wang; John S Barbieri; Harrison P Nguyen; Robert Stavert; Howard P Forman; Jean L Bolognia; Carrie L Kovarik Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Neha N Jariwala; Christopher K Snider; Shivan J Mehta; J Kyle Armstrong; Aaron Smith-McLallen; Junko Takeshita; Carrie L Kovarik; Jules B Lipoff Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Zarqa Ali; Kristina Melbardis Joergensen; Anders Daniel Andersen; Andrei Chiriac; Theis Bjerre-Christensen; Ionela Manole; Ana-Maria Dutei; Irina Deaconescu; Alina Suru; Adina Serban; Ari Pall Isberg; Priyanka Dahiya; Simon Francis Thomsen; John Robert Zibert Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2021-05-25
Authors: Remedios López-Liria; María Ángeles Valverde-Martínez; Antonio López-Villegas; Rafael Jesús Bautista-Mesa; Francisco Antonio Vega-Ramírez; Salvador Peiró; Cesar Leal-Costa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 3.390