Literature DB >> 30286681

The influence of language and culture on cognitive assessment tools in the diagnosis of early cognitive impairment and dementia.

Kok Pin Ng1, Hui Jin Chiew1, Levinia Lim1, Pedro Rosa-Neto2, Nagaendran Kandiah1,3, Serge Gauthier2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cognitive assessment tools measure cognitive impairment and complement biomarkers to link cognitive symptoms with pathophysiological processes underlying dementia. However, language and cultural differences in multilingual populations can influence the interpretation of cognitive assessment tools when applied in cross-cultural and multinational studies. Areas covered: This article examines the influence of culture and language on the interpretation of the Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale, which are more commonly used worldwide. It discusses how this impacted multinational studies. Lastly, it presents language-neutral tools such as the Visual Cognitive Assessment Test, which do not require translation when applied in multilingual populations. Expert commentary: Linguistic and cultural variation within tools due to translation and differences in administration introduce method bias and differential item functioning, which influence the interpretation of cognitive scores in multinational studies. The ultimate goal is to have a tool that accurately measures cognitive impairment, yet with minimal influence from linguistic, cultural, educational, and demographic differences, through concerted international efforts to harmonize the development and validation of tools. While recently developed visual-based language-neutral tools show promise in the early detection of cognitive impairment, further validation will be required for these tools to be applied internationally.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale; Mini-Mental State Examination; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Visual Cognitive Assessment Test; culture; language

Year:  2018        PMID: 30286681     DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2018.1532792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother        ISSN: 1473-7175            Impact factor:   4.618


  7 in total

Review 1.  Translations and cultural adaptations of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment: a systematic and qualitative review.

Authors:  Ilaria Cova; Alessia Nicotra; Giorgia Maestri; Marco Canevelli; Leonardo Pantoni; Simone Pomati
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 2.  The Association of Reproductive Aging with Cognitive Function in Sub-Saharan African Women.

Authors:  Nicole G Jaff; Nigel J Crowther
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  Can Mobile Technology Help Prevent the Burden of Dementia in Low- and Mid-Income Countries?

Authors:  Bruno Bonnechère; Barbara J Sahakian
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-11-12

4.  A passive and objective measure of recognition memory in Alzheimer's disease using Fastball memory assessment.

Authors:  George Stothart; Laura J Smith; Alexander Milton; Elizabeth Coulthard
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Alpha3/alpha2 power ratios relate to performance on a virtual reality shopping task in ageing adults.

Authors:  Joel Patchitt; Lilla A Porffy; Gabriella Whomersley; Timea Szentgyorgyi; Jack Brett; Elias Mouchlianitis; Mitul A Mehta; Judith F Nottage; Sukhi S Shergill
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.702

6.  Canadian Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (CICA): Inter-rater reliability and criterion validity in Anishinaabe communities on Manitoulin Island, Canada.

Authors:  Jennifer D Walker; Megan E O'Connell; Karen Pitawanakwat; Melissa Blind; Wayne Warry; Andrine Lemieux; Christopher Patterson; Cheryl Allaby; Meghan Valvasori; Yantao Zhao; Kristen Jacklin
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement (Amst)       Date:  2021-06-09

7.  Diagnostic Accuracy of 10/66 Dementia Protocol in Fijian-Indian Elders Living in New Zealand.

Authors:  Adrian Martinez-Ruiz; Rita Krishnamurthi; Ekta Singh Dahiya; Reshmi Rai-Bala; Sanjalin Naicker; Susan Yates; Claudia Rivera Rodriguez; Gary Cheung; Makarena Dudley; Ngaire Kerse; Sarah Cullum
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.