| Literature DB >> 30285838 |
Khayriyyah Mohd Hanafiah1,2,3, Mary L Garcia4, Nadine C Barnes4, David A Anderson4,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a proof-of-concept study on preferential binding of polymeric IgA (pIgA) using a novel recombinant rabbit/human chimeric secretory component (cSC) and preliminary assessment of the diagnostic potential of virus-specific pIgA in discriminating acute hepatitis A, E, and C (HAV, HEV, HCV) patients and uninfected controls using an indirect enzyme-linked immunoassay.Entities:
Keywords: Biomarkers; Hepatitis A virus; Hepatitis C virus; Hepatitis E virus; Polymeric immunoglobulin A; Polymeric immunoglobulin receptor; Secretory component; Serodiagnostics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30285838 PMCID: PMC6167832 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3799-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Res Notes ISSN: 1756-0500
Fig. 1cSC preferential binding to dIgA/pIgA on ELISA and detection with monoclonal anti-human SC. Graphs show a cSC detection, b cSC-CD4 capture and c hSC-CD4 capture, to compare binding and provide dynamic range of cSC and hSC binding to human and mouse dIgA, human IgA and human IgM and d monoclonal anti-human SC antibody (AB17377; Abcam, Abingdon UK) detection of 80 kDa hSC and cSC. Note: cSC and hSC not normalized for differences in yield/concentration of active SC, error bars indicate standard error as calculated in Excel. Asterisks indicate statistical significant with reference to dIgA [p value < 0.05 (*), < 0.01 (**), two tailed]
Fig. 2Virus-specific pIgA for serodiagnosis of acute HEV and HAV infection. Scatterplots a show anti-HEV and anti-HAV dIgA compared to IgM reactivity detectable in acute and uninfected samples. Graph b illustrates the much higher S/Co ratio of dIgA compared to IgM in discriminating acute from uninfected samples, while graph c shows anti-HEV dIgA versus anti-HEV IgM in acute samples before and after IgM-depletion, providing evidence that the high reactivity observed for dIgA were not due to cSC cross-reactivity to IgM. Note: Unpaired and paired comparisons conducted using Mann–Whitney U and Wilcoxon test respectively, two-tailed. Asterisks indicate statistical significance of < 0.05 (*), < 0.01 (**), < 0.001 (***), and < 0.0001 (****) and error bars represent SD calculated in GraphPad Prism. S/Co calculated using two SD from mean of uninfected samples
Fig. 3HCV serological profile over time. a Graphs of anti-HCV antibodies compared to viral RNA or ALT over time in two seroconversion panels demonstrate that dIgA may have a different profile compared to IgA (panel 901) and it disappears even in ongoing infection (panel 400062). b Scatterplots of anti-HCV reactivity in seroconversion panels show that unlike anti-HCV IgG and IgM, anti-HCV pIgA (and to some degree anti-HCV IgA) to be statistically significantly higher in early acute phase (0–4 weeks since 1st bleed) compared to chronically infected patients. Note: Unpaired comparisons between each acute phase/early incident timepoint and chronic samples conducted using Mann–Whitney U, two tailed with Bonferonni adjustment in GraphPad Prism