Literature DB >> 30285836

Functional validation of human-specific PowerPlex® 21 System (Promega, USA) in chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes).

Mukesh Thakur1, Kailash Chandra2, Vivek Sahajpal3, Asis Samanta4, Arun Sharma3, Agni Mitra5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was aimed to test the PowerPlex® 21 System (Promega, USA), used for human identification applications for its positive cross-species applicability in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in order to identify heterologous STRs which can be used for individual identification, paternity testing, relatedness establishment and reconstruction of pedigrees and studbook records for captive and wild chimpanzee breeding populations.
RESULTS: Of 21 STRs in PowerPlex® 21 System (Promega, USA), 19 loci amplified and found to be polymorphic. Locus Aml showed differential banding patterns in males and females similar to those seen for humans and correctly assigned sexes of known identity. Altogether, 58 different alleles were found with an average 3.05 ± 0.28 alleles per locus. Mean observed (Ho), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 0.93 ± 0.03 and 0.52 ± 0.05, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chimpanzees; Cross-species amplification; Heterologous markers; Individual identification; Microsatellites; PowerPlex® 21 System

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30285836      PMCID: PMC6171178          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-018-3803-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Introduction

Genetic assessment of free-ranging and captive populations is the key step towards effective formulation and prioritization of breeding policies in any conservation action plan. A few studies have provided direct evidence for an association between genetic variability and reproductive performance in natural populations [1, 2]. However, due to the limited technical expertise available with the zoo authorities, there is limited information about the genetic composition of the founders and potential breeders often limits formulation of an effective conservation plan. Studies suggest that descendants of small founders are more likely to suffer from inbreeding depression [3-5] and are more susceptible to various diseases and parasites [3, 6] Although several previous studies have reported STRs for chimpanzee [7-9], utilization of cross-species markers still provides an easy and rapid solution for profiling closely related species. Hence, data from a similar set of markers can be used in studying phylogeny, evolution and genetic divergence among closely related species [10-13]. In this study, we used PowerPlex® 21 System kit (Promega, USA) designed for humans to test for cross-amplification of the 21 STRs in chimpanzees. In this study, we identified 19 loci from the PowerPlex® 21 System (Promega, USA) that cross-amplified in a single multiplex reaction.

Main text

Methods

Sample collection and DNA extraction

Hair samples from three Chimpanzees (two males and one female) were provided by the Zoo Officials in India. The samples were collected on commercially available hair sample collection cards, GeneSeek (http://www.neogen.com/geneseek). Genomic DNA was extracted from hair follicles using Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. All DNA extraction procedures were done in aseptic conditions.

PCR and microsatellite genotyping

A commercial kit (PowerPlex® 21 System, Promega, USA) designed for humans was used to amplify 21 loci in chimpanzees. The PowerPlex® 21 System is used for human identification applications including forensic analysis, relationship testing and research use. The system allows co-amplification and four-color fluorescent detection of 21 loci (20 STR loci and Amelogenin), including D1S1656, D2S1338, D3S1358, D5S818, D6S1043, D7S820, D8S1179, D12S391, D13S317, D16S539, D18S51, D19S433, D21S11, Amelogenin (henceforth Aml), CSF1PO, FGA, Penta D, Penta E, TH01, TPOX and vWA [14-16]. PCR was conducted with the PowerPlex® 21 5X Master Mix, PowerPlex® 21 5X Primer Pair Mix and sterile water, amplification grade, following manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, USA). We also included positive and negative control reactions to monitor PCR contamination. All the amplification reaction were performed on GeneAmp 9700 thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, USA) in a total volume of 25 µl. Thermal cycling condition was followed as per the PowerPlex® 21 System (Promega, USA). The amplified PCR products were subjected for the fragment analysis on the ABI 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA).

Statistical analysis

Raw data was processed for sizing of alleles using GeneMapper 3.7 (Applied Biosystems, USA). After scoring and re-arrangement of multi-locus genotype data was processed further for the assessment of genetic diversity estimates. Estimates of genetic diversity, including observed number of alleles per locus (Na), effective number alleles (Ne), inbreeding coefficient (F), observed (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He), were obtained using using GENEALEX version 6.41 software [17].

Results

Out of 21 STRs in the PowerPlex® 21 System (Promega, USA), two loci (D5S818 and D12S391) failed to amplify across the chimpanzee samples and 19 loci were found to be polymorphic. Locus Aml, a non-STR marker, demonstrates differential banding patterns in males and females humans [18, 19], and a similar pattern was seen for chimpanzees, with females showing a 78 bp allele and the male 78 bp and 84 bp alleles. Thus, the PowerPlex® 21 System has discriminating power in correctly assigning sexes in Chimpanzees, hence an extended developmental validation of the PowerPlex® 21 System. Altogether, 58 different alleles were found across 19 loci. The number of observed alleles ranged from 5 (D1S1656, D2S1338 & D19S433) to 1 (TH01), with an overall mean number of alleles per locus of 3.05 ± 0.28. The observed number of alleles for all loci exceeded the effective number of alleles, with mean observed 3.05 ± 0.28 (Table 1). Mean Observed (Ho), and expected heterozygosity (He) were 0.93 ± 0.03 and 0.52 ± 0.05, respectively. The mean unbiased expected heterozygosity (UHe) was 0.63 ± 0.06.. The fixation index (F), a representation of inbreeding was in negative, i.e., − 0.89 ± 0.17, representing an outbred population. Observed profiles of seven loci, (D1S1656, D16S539, D2S1338, D21S11, D7S820, D8S1179, and D19S433) exhibited to be relatively more heterozygous and showed numerous alleles, i.e. ≥ four alleles/locus, indicating a strong signature that these three animals are genetically unrelated and might have come from the different genetic tracts.
Table 1

Genetic diversity estimates of Chimpanzees with PowerPlex® 21 System (Promega, USA)

LocusNaNeHoHeUHeF
AMEL2.001.801.000.440.53− 1.25
D3S13583.002.571.000.610.73− 0.64
D1S1656*5.004.501.000.780.93− 0.29
D6S1043+4.003.001.000.670.80− 0.50
D13S3173.002.571.000.610.73− 0.64
Penta E2.001.380.660.280.33− 1.40
D16S539+4.003.601.000.720.87− 0.39
D18S512.002.001.000.500.60− 1.00
D2S1338*5.004.501.000.780.93− 0.29
CSF1PO2.001.801.000.440.53− 1.25
Penta D2.001.381.000.280.33− 2.60
TH011.001.001.000.000.00#N/A
vWA2.001.380.670.280.33− 1.40
D21S11+4.003.600.670.720.870.08
D7S8203.002.571.000.610.73− 0.64
TPOX2.001.381.000.280.33− 2.60
D8S11793.002.001.000.500.60− 1.00
D19S433*5.004.500.670.780.930.14
FGA+4.003.601.000.720.87− 0.39
Mean (SE)3.05 ± 0.282.58 ± 0.260.93 ± 0.030.52 ± 0.050.63 ± 0.06− 0.89 ± 0.17

Where, Na, the Observed number of alleles; Ne, the effective number of alleles; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; UHe, unbiased expected heterozygosity; F, fixation index

Loci with star (*) and plus (+) notion were relatively more heterozygous and can be used in discriminating genealogical relationship

Genetic diversity estimates of Chimpanzees with PowerPlex® 21 System (Promega, USA) Where, Na, the Observed number of alleles; Ne, the effective number of alleles; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; UHe, unbiased expected heterozygosity; F, fixation index Loci with star (*) and plus (+) notion were relatively more heterozygous and can be used in discriminating genealogical relationship Seven loci were relatively more heterozygous and contained ≥ four alleles/locus (Table 2), indicating a strong signature that these three animals are genetically unrelated and might have come from different genetic background.
Table 2

Genotypes of Chimps with most heterozygous STR loci

ChimpUnique genotype ID
Male Chimp 172172107107248252185197297301117117194214
Female Chimp115618091103244256197209289297103108220220
Male Chimp 216416899103256266193193289289117117222234

D1S1656, D16S539, D2S1338, D21S11, D7S820, D8S1179, and D19S433

Genotypes of Chimps with most heterozygous STR loci D1S1656, D16S539, D2S1338, D21S11, D7S820, D8S1179, and D19S433

Discussion

This study has been the first attempt to establish human identification STR kit- PowerPlex® 21 System (Promega, USA) in chimpanzee, extending developmental validation of the PowerPlex® 21 System for individual identification and molecular sexing of chimpanzees. The results showed high genetic variability in the analyzed individuals and three chimps were genetically distinct and with no evidence of inbreeding. This system can be used for population estimation following capture-mark-recapture methods with larger sample sizes, assigning population genetic structure in wild populations, demographic history, and investigating gene flow and other associated parameters of Chimps in wild and captivity.

Limitations

This study identified heterologous microsatellites for Chimps and include as such no potential limitations. However, if we had more number of chimpanzee samples (reference and pellets), we could certainly propose the combination of microsatellites based on probability of identity (PID) and probability of identity for siblings (PSIB) that can be used for individual identification through mark-recapture analysis.
  13 in total

1.  Twenty new microsatellite loci for use with hair and faecal samples in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes troglodytes).

Authors:  B Goossens; S Latour; C Vidal; A Jamart; M Ancrenaz; M W Bruford
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Characterization of 26 miniSTR loci for improved analysis of degraded DNA samples.

Authors:  Carolyn R Hill; Margaret C Kline; Michael D Coble; John M Butler
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Genetic data of nine non-CODIS STRs in Chinese Han population from Guangdong Province, Southern China.

Authors:  De-Jian Lu; Qiu-Ling Liu; Hu Zhao
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 4.  Conservation genetics.

Authors:  R Frankham
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  Eighteen polymorphic microsatellites for domestic pigeon Columba livia var. domestica developed by cross species amplification of chicken markers.

Authors:  S Sathyakumar
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 1.166

6.  Selection against inbred song sparrows during a natural population bottleneck.

Authors:  L F Keller; P Arcese; J N Smith; W M Hochachka; S C Stearns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genetic evaluation of ex situ conservation breeding projects of Cheer Pheasant (Catreus wallichii) and Western Tragopan (Tragopan melanocephalus) in India.

Authors:  Shipra Garg; Ruheena Javed; Shudhanta Sood; Harvinder Singh
Journal:  Zoo Biol       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 1.421

8.  GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research--an update.

Authors:  Rod Peakall; Peter E Smouse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  X- and Y-chromosome specific variants of the amelogenin gene allow sex determination in sheep (Ovis aries) and European red deer (Cervus elaphus).

Authors:  I Pfeiffer; B Brenig
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Genetic structure of chimpanzee populations.

Authors:  Celine Becquet; Nick Patterson; Anne C Stone; Molly Przeworski; David Reich
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cross-species validation of human specific STR system, SureID® 21G and SureID® 23comp (Health Gene Technologies) in Chimpanzee (Pan Troglodytes).

Authors:  Abhishek Singh; Mukesh Thakur; Vivek Sahajpal; Sujeet K Singh; Kailash Chandra; Arun Sharma; Nisha Devi; Ausma Bernot
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2019-11-19
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.