Thien D Duong1, Sergey A Sapchenko1,2,3, Ivan da Silva4, Harry G W Godfrey1, Yongqiang Cheng5, Luke L Daemen5, Pascal Manuel4, Anibal J Ramirez-Cuesta5, Sihai Yang1, Martin Schröder1. 1. School of Chemistry , University of Manchester , Oxford Road , Manchester M13 9PL , United Kingdom. 2. Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry , Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences , Acad. Lavrentieva Avenue, 3 , 630090 Novosibirsk , Russia. 3. Faculty of Natural Sciences , Novosibirsk State University , Pirogova Street, 2 , 630090 Novosibirsk , Russia. 4. ISIS Facility, STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory , Chilton , Oxfordshire OX11 0QX , United Kingdom. 5. Oak Ridge National Laboratory , Oak Ridge , Tennessee 37831 , United States.
Abstract
We report the first example of crystallographic observation of acetylene binding to -NO2 groups in a metal-organic framework (MOF). Functionalization of MFM-102 with -NO2 groups on phenyl groups leads to a 15% reduction in BET surface area in MFM-102-NO2. However, this is coupled to a 28% increase in acetylene adsorption to 192 cm3 g-1 at 298 K and 1 bar, comparable to other leading porous materials. Neutron diffraction and inelastic scattering experiments reveal the role of -NO2 groups, in cooperation with open metal sites, in the binding of acetylene in MFM-102-NO2.
We report the first example of crystallographic observation of acetylene binding to -NO2 groups in a metal-organic framework (MOF). Functionalization of MFM-102 with -NO2 groups on phenyl groups leads to a 15% reduction in BET surface area in MFM-102-NO2. However, this is coupled to a 28% increase in acetylene adsorption to 192 cm3 g-1 at 298 K and 1 bar, comparable to other leading porous materials. Neutron diffraction and inelastic scattering experiments reveal the role of -NO2 groups, in cooperation with open metal sites, in the binding of acetylene in MFM-102-NO2.
Acetylene is an important chemical
for the production of polymers and other advanced materials.[1] However, it is highly explosive and cannot be
compressed beyond 2 atm at room temperature, thus making its storage
and transport a challenge. Acetylene storage is achieved currently
by dissolving acetylene gas in acetone under high pressure (equivalent
to ∼10 atm) in a heavy-duty tank filled with porous materials,
such as firebrick.[2] This enables the transport
of acetylene in liquid form. However, such processes are not only
costly but also limit the purity of stored acetylene to ∼95%,
making it unsuitable for many applications unless a secondary purification
process is applied. Porous metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)
are emerging sorbents for a variety of gases owing to their high porosity,
well-defined pore size, their design flexibility and ability to incorporate
active binding sites.[3] Recently, there
has been an increasing interest in the study of MOFs for acetylene
storage,[4] and the introduction of organic
functional groups is an efficient approach to increase the gas binding
within pores. MOFs incorporating −OH,[5] −NH2,[6] −CONH–,[7]–C≡C–,[8] R—CO—R,[9] −R,[10] −OR,[11] pyridine-,[12] pyrimidine-,[13] pyrazine-,[13] pyridazine-,[13] and
naphthalene[14] groups have been tested for
acetylene adsorption. However, molecular insights into the precise
role of these moieties on the binding of acetylene is largely lacking,
thus restricting the design of improved materials.Acetylene
is relatively electron-rich due to its triple bond, and
we argued that MOFs incorporating electro-positive or electron withdrawing
groups would be a promising approach to facilitate C2H2 binding. The nitro group (−NO2) is one
of the most powerful electron-withdrawing groups. However, the direct
visualization of gas binding to −NO2 groups in MOFs
has not been reported to date and adsorption of acetylene in NO2-decorated MOFs remains unexplored.[15] Here, we report the study of acetylene adsorption in a family of
four iso-structural MOFs (the MFM-102 series) bearing different functional
groups, including nitro, amine, and alkane groups. The selection of
these functional groups gives a wide coverage in terms of their electron
donating and withdrawing power. We found that functionalization of
the parent MFM-102 with NO2 groups leads to a 16% reduction
in the BET surface area in MFM-102-NO2, but a 28% improvement
in acetylene adsorption to 192 cm3 g–1 at 298 K and 1 bar, comparable to the leading materials for acetylene
storage. The binding domains for adsorbed acetylene molecules in MFM-102-NO2 have been studied by in situ neutron powder
diffraction and inelastic scattering experiments. In comparison, other
functional groups (i.e., amine and alkane groups in MFM-102-NH2 and MFM-111, respectively) have neutral or detrimental effects
on acetylene adsorption compared to MFM-102-NO2. Importantly,
we describe the first example of observation of direct binding of
acetylene molecules to the −NO2 groups in a MOF
material, leading to the optimal adsorption of this substrate.H4L1 and H4L2 were
synthesized using our previously reported methods.[16] Introduction of nitro and amine groups to H4L1 yielded H4L3 and H4L4, respectively. Single crystals of MFM-102, MFM-111,
MFM-102-NO2, and MFM-102-NH2 were synthesized
from Cu(NO3)2·6H2O and the corresponding
ligand in DMF or DMF/DMSO under solvothermal conditions. Single crystal
X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that all these MOFs are iso-structural,
crystallize in the hexagonal space group R3̅m, and adopt a NbO-type structure (Figure ).
Figure 1
Views of organic linkers and the crystal structure
for MFM-102,
MFM-111, MFM-102-NO2, and MFM-102-NH2. The BET
surface area for each MOF is shown at the bottom (C, dark gray; O,
red; N, blue; Cu, turquoise; all coordinated waters and hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity, except for the hydrogen atoms on the −NH2 group).
Views of organic linkers and the crystal structure
for MFM-102,
MFM-111, MFM-102-NO2, and MFM-102-NH2. The BET
surface area for each MOF is shown at the bottom (C, dark gray; O,
red; N, blue; Cu, turquoise; all coordinated waters and hydrogen atoms
are omitted for clarity, except for the hydrogen atoms on the −NH2 group).The crystal structure
of MFM-102-NO2 is described here
in detail. Two Cu(II) ions are bridged by four carboxylate groups
to form a [Cu2(OOCR)4(OH2)2] paddlewheel node {Cu2}. This serves as a 4-connected
node that is further linked to other 4-connected nodes to construct
a 3D NbO-type open structure. All these MOFs are constructed by the
alternative packing of 2 types of metal–ligand cages (A and
B) (Figure ). Cage
A, constructed by six linkers and six {Cu2} paddlewheels,
has a cylindrical shape with a diameter of 14 Å and length of
19 Å. Cage B (length of 32 Å) has a shuttle-shape with 12
{Cu2} paddlewheels residing at the vertices and 6 ligands
on the faces. It is noteworthy that the cages in MFM-111, MFM-102-NH2, and MFM-102-NO2 are decorated with alkane, −NH2 and −NO2 groups, respectively, pointing
into both cages, thus providing additional binding sites for gas molecules.
Phase purity of each complex has been confirmed by PXRD data (see SI). The coordinated water molecules and solvent
molecules in the pores can be removed under heating to generate open
Cu(II) sites in the desolvated materials.N2 isotherms
at 77 K confirm that desolvated MFM-102,
MFM-111, MFM-102-NH2, and MFM-102-NO2 show BET
surface areas of 3412, 2930, 2928, and 2893 m2 g–1, respectively (Figures , 2) with introduction of functional
groups leading to reduction in porosity. These values are higher than
other reported MOFs with NbO-topology such as NJU-Bai-17 (2423 m2 g–1),[17] UTSA-88
(1771 m2 g–1),[18] and ZJU-7 (2209 m2 g–1).[19]
Figure 2
Adsorption isotherms for desolvated MFM-102, MFM-111,
MFM-102-NO2, and MFM-102-NH2. (a) N2 at 77 K; (b)
C2H2 at 298 K; (c) CH4 at 298 K.
Solid and open symbols represent adsorption and desorption, respectively.
Adsorption isotherms for desolvated MFM-102, MFM-111,
MFM-102-NO2, and MFM-102-NH2. (a) N2 at 77 K; (b)
C2H2 at 298 K; (c) CH4 at 298 K.
Solid and open symbols represent adsorption and desorption, respectively.Uptakes of C2H2 at 273 K and 1 bar were recorded
as 292, 261, 251, and 241 cm3 g–1 for
MFM-102-NO2, MFM-102-NH2, MFM-102, and MFM-111,
respectively (Figure S8). Significantly,
the C2H2 uptake of MFM-102-NO2 (292
cm3 g–1) is among the best-performing
MOFs under the same conditions (Table S3), such as NJU-Bai17 (295 cm3 g–1),[17] MFM-188a (297 cm3 g–1),[7] and FJI-H8 (277 cm3 g–1).[20] Interestingly, although
the introduction of NO2-groups to MFM-102 leads to a 15%
reduction of BET surface area in MFM-102-NO2, it results
in a 28% enhancement in C2H2 adsorption under
ambient conditions, demonstrating the positive effect of NO2-groups on C2H2 binding. With similar BET surface
areas, MFM-102-NO2, MFM-102-NH2, and MFM-111
provide an excellent platform to directly examine the role of functional
group on C2H2 adsorption. Compared to the parent
MFM-102, introduction of the amine group shows a small increase (5.3%)
in adsorption of C2H2, while the alkane group
leads a moderate reduction (−12%) in C2H2 adsorption. The isosteric heats of C2H2 adsorption
(Q) for these MOFs are around 31 to
33 kJ mol–1, comparable to reported MOFs with open
Cu(II) sites (Table S3). The Q plots shows little variation as a function of uptake,
indicating the presence of cooperativity of host–guest and
guest–guest binding.[21]To
establish the role of these functional groups on C2H2 binding, adsorption of CH4, as a noninteracting
gas probe, was also measured. At 298 K and 20 bar, MFM-102 shows a
CH4 uptake of 236 cm3 g–1,
which is higher than that for MFM-102-NO2, MFM-102-NH2, and MFM-111 (188, 179, and 173 cm3 g–1, respectively). The trend in uptake of CH4 is consistent
with the variation of BET surface areas of these materials, and suggests
potential binding interactions between the −NO2 functional
group and unsaturated C2H2.Six independent
binding sites (I to VI) for adsorbed C2D2 molecules
in MFM-102-NO2 have been determined
by in situ neutron powder diffraction (NPD) (Figure ). Sites I and II
(occupancies of 0.41 and 0.40, respectively) are located at the open
Cu(II) sites with a side-on interaction between the C≡C bond
and Cu(II) [Cu···C≡C(centroid) = 3.98(5) and
2.93(8) Å for site I and II, respectively]. Interestingly, sites
I and II have very different bonding distance to the open Cu(II) site.
A closer examination revealed that site I also forms supramolecular
interactions to two aromatic −CH groups from two adjacent phenyl
rings [−CH···C≡C(centroid) = 3.23(2),
3.48(3) Å] and becomes the most populated location owing to this
cooperativity between sites. Site III (occupancy 0.31) is stabilized
by a combination of three types of interactions to the host: (i) hydrogen
bonds between the D(δ+) of C2D2 molecules and O(δ–) center of the −NO2 group [D···O = 1.99(9), 2.35(6) Å]; (ii)
supramolecular interactions between the C≡C bond and the −CH
group on adjacent NO2-decorated phenyl rings [−CH···C≡C(centroid)
= 2.47(9), 2.80(4) Å]; (iii) intermolecular dipole interactions
between π-electrons in the C≡C bond (site III) and D
atoms of C2D2 at site IV. Site IV (occupancy
0.26) is also stabilized by hydrogen bonds between C2D2 molecules and −NO2 groups [D···ONO2 = 1.69(2) Å] and a −CH bond of the NO2-decorated phenyl ring [−CH···C≡C(centroid)
= 3.11(4) Å]. Moreover, there is a weak π···π
interaction between C≡C bond of C2D2(IV)
and the NO2-decorated phenyl ring [ring centroid···C≡C(centroid)
= 4.46(8) Å]. Site V (occupancy = 0.16) is at the window between
the cylindrical and spherical cages involving similar side-on mode
interactions with the −CH group of the NO2-decorated
phenyl ring [−CH···C≡C(centroid) = 2.63(5)
Å] and the hydrogen bond to the −NO2 group
[D···ONO2 = 3.05(10), 3.17(7) Å]. Site
VI (occupancy = 0.09) is located in the center of the elongated cage,
interacting directly with the −NO2 group from three
surrounding ligands with D···ONO2 distances
ranging from 2.37(1) to 2.56(3) Å. Overall, C2D2 molecules at sites III–VI are all directly associated
with the −NO2 groups in the pore, confirming the
positive effect of −NO2 group in achieving optimal
acetylene binding.
Figure 3
View of the binding sites for adsorbed C2D2 molecules in MFM-102-NO2. (C, dark gray; O, red;
N, blue;
Cu, turquoise and C2D2 molecules at site I (light
blue), site II (orange), site III (light green), site IV (dark green),
site V (purple) and site VI (sapphire).
View of the binding sites for adsorbed C2D2 molecules in MFM-102-NO2. (C, dark gray; O, red;
N, blue;
Cu, turquoise and C2D2 molecules at site I (light
blue), site II (orange), site III (light green), site IV (dark green),
site V (purple) and site VI (sapphire).The binding dynamics of C2H2-loaded
MFM-102-NO2 were also studied by in situ inelastic neutron
scattering (INS). The INS spectrum of bare MOF shows excellent agreement
with that obtained from DFT calculations, thus allowing assignment
of vibrational modes (Figure S12). The INS
spectrum of C2H2-loaded MFM-102-NO2 shows a significant increase in intensity (Figures and S11). The
INS peaks at 80 and 95 meV (assigned as the asymmetric and symmetric
C–H bending mode of C2H2, respectively)
show significant broadening on adsorption of C2H2 with the appearance of shoulders on both sides and a shift to lower
energy. In addition, the translational modes of C2H2 molecules, represented by the INS peaks at low energy region
(below 25 meV), show restricted motion on adsorption, with adsorbed
C2H2 molecules well-ordered in the pore as these
peaks all shift to lower energy but still remain a 3-fold feature
as found in solid C2H2. Moreover, in the difference
spectra, peaks at 164 and 189 meV (Figure S12) develop upon inclusion of C2H2 molecules
in the pore, and this enhancement of both symmetrical and antisymmetrical
stretching modes of −NO2 groups is consistent with
the formation of host–guest interactions between the −NO2 groups and adsorbed C2H2 molecules.
Overall, these results are highly consistent with the crystallographic
studies showing various binding sites (I–VI) of C2D2 and the strong interaction between the −NO2 group and C2D2 molecules (sites III–VI)
in the pore of MFM-102-NO2.
Figure 4
INS spectra for MFM-102-NO2 with C2H2 loading. Comparison of difference
INS plots derived by subtracting
INS spectra for C2H2-loaded MFM-102-NO2 and bare MFM-102-NO2 spectra (black), with condensed
C2H2 in the solid state (red).
INS spectra for MFM-102-NO2 with C2H2 loading. Comparison of difference
INS plots derived by subtracting
INS spectra for C2H2-loaded MFM-102-NO2 and bare MFM-102-NO2 spectra (black), with condensed
C2H2 in the solid state (red).Achieving optimal gas adsorption and binding in
porous materials
requires integration of high porosity and appropriate binding sites.
However, introduction of functional groups naturally reduces the porosity
of decorated MOFs, leading to a trade-off between these two factors.
In this study, the effect of amine, alkane and nitro groups on adsorption
of C2H2 has been examined in a family of isostructural
MOFs showing high BET surface areas. The first example of binding
between electron-rich C2H2 molecules and electron
withdrawing −NO2 groups in the MOF, MFM-102-NO2, at crystallographic resolution has been established. The
combination of high BET surface area, high density of open Cu(II)
sites and accessible NO2-groups leads to excellent adsorption
capacity of C2H2 in MFM-102-NO2,
making it one of the best-performing acetylene adsorbents to date.
Authors: John P S Mowat; Stuart R Miller; John M Griffin; Valerie R Seymour; Sharon E Ashbrook; Stephen P Thompson; David Fairen-Jimenez; Ana-Maria Banu; Tina Düren; Paul A Wright Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2011-09-29 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Ramanathan Vaidhyanathan; Simon S Iremonger; George K H Shimizu; Peter G Boyd; Saman Alavi; Tom K Woo Journal: Science Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Xiang Lin; Irvin Telepeni; Alexander J Blake; Anne Dailly; Craig M Brown; Jason M Simmons; Marco Zoppi; Gavin S Walker; K Mark Thomas; Timothy J Mays; Peter Hubberstey; Neil R Champness; Martin Schröder Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2009-02-18 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Sihai Yang; Xiang Lin; Anne Dailly; Alexander J Blake; Peter Hubberstey; Neil R Champness; Martin Schröder Journal: Chemistry Date: 2009 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Florian Moreau; Ivan da Silva; Nada H Al Smail; Timothy L Easun; Mathew Savage; Harry G W Godfrey; Stewart F Parker; Pascal Manuel; Sihai Yang; Martin Schröder Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 14.919