| Literature DB >> 30285088 |
Anna Czekajło1, Dorota Różańska1, Katarzyna Zatońska2, Andrzej Szuba3,4, Bożena Regulska-Ilow1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dietary pattern (DP) analysis is a statistical method used to evaluate the comprehensive effect of the diet on health. The aim of the study was to assess the relationship between DPs derived in selected population of Lower Silesia and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and its components.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30285088 PMCID: PMC6426002 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Public Health ISSN: 1101-1262 Impact factor: 3.367
General characteristics of the study group
| Variable | Total | MS+ | MS− | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 54.5±9.8 | 56.4±9.1 | 53.0±10.1 | <0.0001 |
| Female (%) | 64.0 | 60.6 | 66.6 | 0.0124 |
| Rural place of residence (%) | 43.7 | 54.9 | 34.8 | <0.0001 |
| University education level (%) | 29.2 | 21.5 | 35.3 | <0.0001 |
| Current smoking (%) | 21.0 | 23.2 | 19.3 | 0.0555 |
| High physical activity level (%) | 65.7 | 67.8 | 64.1 | 0.1130 |
| WC male (cm) | 100.0±12.8 | 106.6±12.0 | 93.9±10.3 | <0.0001 |
| WC female (cm) | 88.8±13.7 | 97.6±12.0 | 82.6±11.2 | <0.0001 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 145.2±21.6 | 152.4±21.1 | 139.5±20.2 | <0.0001 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 86.1±11.4 | 89.1±11.3 | 83.7±10.9 | <0.0001 |
| HDL-C male (mmol/l) | 1.34±0.38 | 1.20±0.31 | 1.47±0.40 | <0.0001 |
| HDL-C female (mmol/l) | 1.60±0.41 | 1.39±0.37 | 1.76±0.36 | <0.0001 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.43±0.94 | 1.90±1.19 | 1.06±0.41 | <0.0001 |
| FG (mmol/l) | 5.54±1.22 | 6.11±1.51 | 5.1±0.68 | <0.0001 |
BP, blood pressure; FG, fasting glucose; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MS+ and MS, mean the presence and the absence of the metabolic syndrome, respectively; NS, no statistically significant difference; TG, triglycerides; WC, waist circumference.
A P-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Statistical difference between groups MS+ and MS−.
Factor-loading matrix for the identified dietary patterns
| Variable | ‘Western’ DP | ‘Fruit & vegetables’ DP | ‘Traditional’ DP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Refined grains | |||
| Processed meat | 0.43 | ||
| Sweets | 0.24 | ||
| Sugar and honey | |||
| Chips | 0.45 | 0.24 | |
| Plant fats | 0.44 | ||
| Animal fats | 0.43 | ||
| Red meat | 0.42 | ||
| Juices | 0.41 | ||
| Fruits | |||
| Vegetables | 0.35 | ||
| Nuts, seeds and raisins | |||
| Unrefined grains | 0.44 | ||
| Milk and dairy | 0.44 | ||
| Mixed dishes | |||
| Soups | |||
| Fish | |||
| Eggs | 0.38 | 0.20 | |
| Poultry | 0.33 | 0.38 | 0.34 |
| Beverages | 0.25 | ||
| Alcohol | |||
| Potatoes | |||
| Explained variance (%) | 18.8 | 10.4 | 6.0 |
The absolute values of factor loadings <0.20 were not shown; the absolute values of factor loadings ≥0.50 were bold.
DP, dietary pattern.
Characteristics of study group across the quartiles of dietary patterns in respect to the metabolic syndrome components occurrence
| Variable | ‘Western’ DP | ‘Fruit & vegetables’ DP | ‘Traditional’ DP | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q4 | Q1 | Q4 | Q1 | Q4 | ||||
| FG≥5.6 mmol/l | 36.9 | 46.3 | 0.006 | 43.3 | 36.8 | 0.056 | 36.4 | 47.8 | 0.001 |
| Systolic BP ≥130 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥85 mmHg | 82.9 | 78.4 | 0.181 | 86.8 | 79.9 | 0.008 | 80.2 | 81.4 | 0.669 |
| HDL-C <1.0 mmol/l in males and 1.3 mmol/l in females | 16.1 | 23.8 | 0.003 | 22.5 | 20.6 | 0.508 | 21.0 | 19.6 | 0.614 |
| TG ≥1.7 mmol/l | 22.0 | 33.1 | 0.000 | 28.9 | 20.3 | 0.005 | 21.5 | 28.9 | 0.015 |
| WC ≥94 cm in males and ≥80 cm in females (%) | 68.5 | 74.8 | 0.046 | 73.3 | 67.6 | 0.074 | 65.0 | 77.5 | 0.000 |
| MS (at least three components) (%) | 40.8 | 50.7 | 0.005 | 48.9 | 40.4 | 0.015 | 38.3 | 51.0 | 0.003 |
History of specific treatment for this abnormality.
BP, blood pressure; DP, dietary pattern; FG, fasting glucose; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MS, metabolic syndrome; NS, no statistically significant difference; Q1, 4, quartile 1, 4; TG, triglycerides; WC, waist circumference.
A P-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Odds ratio (OR) for MS and its components occurrence across the quartiles of dietary patterns
| Dietary pattern | Q | Odds ratio (95% CI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raised FG | Raised BP | Reduced HDL-C | Raised TG | Raised WC | MS | ||
| ‘Western’ DP | Q4 | 1.47 (1.11–1.95) | 0.75 (0.53–1.07) | 1.62 (1.14–2.30) | 1.75 (1.28–2.39) | 1.36 (1.00–1.85) | 1.49 (1.13–1.96) |
| Q3 | 1.17 (0.88–1.55) | 0.83 (0.59–1.19) | 1.36 (0.96–1.95) | 1.18 (0.85–1.62) | 1.11 (0.82–1.50) | 1.22 (0.92–1.61) | |
| Q2 | 0.90 (0.68–1.20) | 0.93 (1.65–1.34) | 1.49 (1.05–2.12) | 1.06 (0.76–1.47) | 0.95 (0.70–1.28) | 0.93 (0.70–1.24) | |
| Q1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| ‘Fruit & vegetables’ DP | Q4 | 0.76 (0.58–1.01) | 0.60 (0.42–0.88) | 0.89 (0.64–1.25) | 0.63 (0.46–0.87) | 0.76 (0.57–1.01) | 0.71 (0.54–0.93) |
| Q3 | 0.84 (0.64–1.11) | 0.48 (0.33–0.69) | 0.79 (0.56–1.11) | 0.91 (0.67–1.23) | 0.73 (0.55–0.97) | 0.75 (0.57–0.99) | |
| Q2 | 0.85 (0.64–1.12) | 0.65 (0.44–0.94) | 0.93 (0.67–1.30) | 0.91 (0.67–1.24) | 1.02 (0.80–1.27) | 0.87 (0.66–1.14) | |
| Q1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| ‘Traditional’ DP | Q4 | 1.60 (1.21–2.11) | 1.08 (0.77–1.52) | 0.92 (0.65–1.29) | 1.48 (1.08–2.04) | 1.85 (1.36–2.51) | 1.67 (1.26–2.20) |
| Q3 | 1.11 (0.84–1.47) | 1.14 (0.80–1.61) | 1.12 (0.80–1.56) | 1.43 (1.04–1.96) | 1.34 (1.00–1.36) | 1.38 (1.04–1.82) | |
| Q2 | 0.95 (0.72–1.26) | 0.97–0.70–1.34) | 0.90 (0.64–1.27) | 1.18 (0.85–1.64) | 1.11 (0.83–1.48) | 1.11 (0.84–1.47) | |
| Q1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| ‘Western’ DP | Q4 | 0.92 (0.66–1.28) | 0.83 (0.55–1.27) | 1.08 (0.72–1.60) | 1.24 (0.84–1.83) | 0.97 (0.68–1.39) | 0.90 (0.65–1.25) |
| Q3 | 0.92 (0.68–1.24) | 0.93 (0.62–1.37) | 1.10 (0.75–1.61) | 1.00 (0.66–1.53) | 0.96 (0.69–1.32) | 0.96 (0.71–1.30) | |
| Q2 | 0.80 (0.59–1.08) | 0.94 (0.64–1.39) | 1.36 (0.95–1.96) | 1.02 (0.72–1.45) | 0.87 (0.64–1.19) | 0.84 (0.62–1.13) | |
| Q1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| ‘Fruit & vegetables’ DP | Q4 | 1.15 (0.84–1.57) | 0.66 (0.43–1.01) | 1.04 (0.72–1.51) | 0.97 (0.68–1.38) | 0.99 (0.71–1.38) | 1.13 (0.82–1.54) |
| Q3 | 1.12 (0.83–1.51) | 0.54 (0.36–0.82) | 0.85 (0.59–1.22) | 1.22 (0.88–1.69) | 0.92 (0.66–1.27) | 1.05 (0.78–1.42) | |
| Q2 | 0.92 (0.68–1.23) | 0.61 (0.40–0.91) | 0.93 (0.66–1.32) | 1.06 (0.77–1.45) | 1.08 (0.780–1.51) | 0.97 (0.7–1.30) | |
| Q1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| ‘Traditional’ DP | Q4 | 1.23 (0.92–1.66) | 0.98 (0.67–1.44) | 0.78 (0.55–1.11) | 1.21 (0.87–1.68) | 1.52 (1.10–2.12) | 1.28 (0.95–1.72) |
| Q3 | 0.88 (0.65–1.18) | 1.08 (0.74–1.58) | 0.99 (0.70–1.38) | 1.26 (0.90–1.75) | 1.15 (0.84–1.57) | 1.12 (0.83–1.50) | |
| Q2 | 0.84 (0.63–1.14) | 0.97 (0.67–1.42) | 0.83 (0.58–1.17) | 1.09 (0.78–1.53) | 1.06 (0.78–1.44) | 1.01 (0.76–1.35) | |
| Q1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Adjusted for: age, sex, place of residence, education level, physical activity level, smoking status and total energy intake.
Level of statistical significance P<0.05.
BP, blood pressure; DP, dietary pattern; FG, fasting glucose; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MS, metabolic syndrome; Q1, 2, 3, 4, quartile 1, 2, 3, 4; TG, triglycerides; WC, waist circumference.