Literature DB >> 30285058

Outcomes of Patients With Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis Followed Up in Heart Valve Clinics.

Patrizio Lancellotti1,2, Julien Magne3, Raluca Dulgheru1, Marie-Annick Clavel4, Erwan Donal5, Mani A Vannan6, John Chambers7, Raphael Rosenhek8, Gilbert Habib9,10, Guy Lloyd11, Stefano Nistri12, Madalina Garbi13, Stella Marchetta1, Khalil Fattouch14,15, Augustin Coisne16, David Montaigne16, Thomas Modine16, Laurent Davin1, Olivier Gach1, Marc Radermecker1, Shizhen Liu6, Linda Gillam17, Andrea Rossi18, Elena Galli5, Federica Ilardi1, Lionel Tastet4, Romain Capoulade4, Robert Zilberszac8, E Mara Vollema19, Victoria Delgado19, Bernard Cosyns20, Stephane Lafitte21, Anne Bernard22,23, Luc A Pierard1, Jeroen J Bax19, Philippe Pibarot4, Cécile Oury1.   

Abstract

Importance: The natural history and the management of patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) have not been fully examined in the current era. Objective: To determine the clinical outcomes of patients with asymptomatic AS using data from the Heart Valve Clinic International Database. Design, Setting, and Participants: This registry was assembled by merging data from prospectively gathered institutional databases from 10 heart valve clinics in Europe, Canada, and the United States. Asymptomatic patients with an aortic valve area of 1.5 cm2 or less and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 50% at entry were considered for the present analysis. Data were collected from January 2001 to December 2014, and data were analyzed from January 2017 to July 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Natural history, need for aortic valve replacement (AVR), and survival of asymptomatic patients with moderate or severe AS at entry followed up in a heart valve clinic. Indications for AVR were based on current guideline recommendations.
Results: Of the 1375 patients included in this analysis, 834 (60.7%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 71 (13) years. A total of 861 patients (62.6%) had severe AS (aortic valve area less than 1.0 cm2). The mean (SD) overall survival during medical management (mean [SD] follow up, 27 [24] months) was 93% (1%), 86% (2%), and 75% (4%) at 2, 4, and 8 years, respectively. A total of 104 patients (7.6%) died under observation, including 57 patients (54.8%) from cardiovascular causes. The crude rate of sudden death was 0.65% over the duration of the study. A total of 542 patients (39.4%) underwent AVR, including 388 patients (71.6%) with severe AS at study entry and 154 (28.4%) with moderate AS at entry who progressed to severe AS. Those with severe AS at entry who underwent AVR did so at a mean (SD) of 14.4 (16.6) months and a median of 8.7 months. The mean (SD) 2-year and 4-year AVR-free survival rates for asymptomatic patients with severe AS at baseline were 54% (2%) and 32% (3%), respectively. In those undergoing AVR, the 30-day postprocedural mortality was 0.9%. In patients with severe AS at entry, peak aortic jet velocity (greater than 5 m/s) and LVEF (less than 60%) were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality without AVR; these factors were also associated with postprocedural mortality in those patients with severe AS at baseline who underwent AVR (surgical AVR in 310 patients; transcatheter AVR in 78 patients). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with asymptomatic AS followed up in heart valve centers, the risk of sudden death is low, and rates of overall survival are similar to those reported from previous series. Patients with severe AS at baseline and peak aortic jet velocity of 5.0 m/s or greater or LVEF less than 60% have increased risks of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality even after AVR. The potential benefit of early intervention should be considered in these high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30285058      PMCID: PMC6583052          DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Cardiol            Impact factor:   14.676


  34 in total

1.  Effect of left ventricular ejection fraction on postoperative outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jordi S Dahl; Mackram F Eleid; Hector I Michelena; Christopher G Scott; Rakesh M Suri; Hartzell V Schaff; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Volkmar Falk; Jeroen J Bax; Michele De Bonis; Christian Hamm; Per Johan Holm; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Emmanuel Lansac; Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz; Raphael Rosenhek; Johan Sjögren; Pilar Tornos Mas; Alec Vahanian; Thomas Walther; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Windecker; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Decision-making in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis: why are so many denied surgery?

Authors:  Bernard Iung; Agnès Cachier; Gabriel Baron; David Messika-Zeitoun; François Delahaye; Pilar Tornos; Christa Gohlke-Bärwolf; Eric Boersma; Philippe Ravaud; Alec Vahanian
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 4.  Risk stratification in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Carl Hayward; John Pepper; Roxy Senior
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 5.  Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

Authors:  A Pieter Kappetein; Stuart J Head; Philippe Généreux; Nicolo Piazza; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Eugene H Blackstone; Thomas G Brott; David J Cohen; Donald E Cutlip; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Rebecca T Hahn; Ajay J Kirtane; Mitchell W Krucoff; Susheel Kodali; Michael J Mack; Roxana Mehran; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Pascal Vranckx; John G Webb; Stephan Windecker; Patrick W Serruys; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Perioperative risk of major non-cardiac surgery in patients with severe aortic stenosis: a reappraisal in contemporary practice.

Authors:  Teruko Tashiro; Sorin V Pislaru; Jodi M Blustin; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Martin D Abel; Christopher G Scott; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Calcific aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Marie-Annick Clavel; Patrick Mathieu; Bernard Iung; Patrizio Lancellotti; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 52.329

8.  Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael J Mack; Raj R Makkar; Lars G Svensson; Susheel K Kodali; Vinod H Thourani; E Murat Tuzcu; D Craig Miller; Howard C Herrmann; Darshan Doshi; David J Cohen; Augusto D Pichard; Samir Kapadia; Todd Dewey; Vasilis Babaliaros; Wilson Y Szeto; Mathew R Williams; Dean Kereiakes; Alan Zajarias; Kevin L Greason; Brian K Whisenant; Robert W Hodson; Jeffrey W Moses; Alfredo Trento; David L Brown; William F Fearon; Philippe Pibarot; Rebecca T Hahn; Wael A Jaber; William N Anderson; Maria C Alu; John G Webb
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Impact of left ventricular remodelling patterns on outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Romain Capoulade; Marie-Annick Clavel; Florent Le Ven; Abdellaziz Dahou; Christophe Thébault; Lionel Tastet; Mylène Shen; Marie Arsenault; Élisabeth Bédard; Jonathan Beaudoin; Kim O'Connor; Mathieu Bernier; Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  Aortic Stenosis: New Insights in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention.

Authors:  Saki Ito; Jae K Oh
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 3.101

Review 2.  Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: Contemporary Evaluation and Management.

Authors:  Mohamed Salah Abdelghani; Sundus Sardar; Abdelhaleem Shawky Hamada
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2022-05-16

3.  Economic Evaluation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Compared to Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Chinese Intermediate-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Weicong Zhang; Yake Lou; Yujiang Liu; Hongwei Wang; Chun Zhang; Linxue Qian
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-05-26

4.  Asymptomatic patients with very severe aortic stenosis-operate or watch?

Authors:  Pradeep Narayan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-02-02

Review 5.  [ESC/EACTS guidelines 2021 on the management of valvular heart diseases : What are the most important innovations?]

Authors:  F S Nettersheim; S Baldus
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Survival and quality of life after transcatheter aortic valve implantation relative to the general population.

Authors:  Jo M Zelis; Marcel van 't Veer; Saskia Houterman; Nico H J Pijls; Pim A L Tonino
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2020-05-22

Review 7.  Exercise echocardiography in aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Adriana Postolache; Mai-Linh Nguyen; Tridetti Julien; Simona Sperlongano; Alexandra Maria Chitroceanu; Raluca Dulgheru; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.596

8.  Priorities for Patient-Centered Research in Valvular Heart Disease: A Report From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Suzanne V Arnold; Rodrigo Bagur; Lindsay Clarke; Megan Coylewright; Frank Evans; Judy Hung; Sandra B Lauck; Susan Peschin; Vandana Sachdev; Lisa M Tate; Jason H Wasfy; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Cardiac Energetics in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Mark A Peterzan; William T Clarke; Craig A Lygate; Hannah A Lake; Justin Y C Lau; Jack J Miller; Errin Johnson; Jennifer J Rayner; Moritz J Hundertmark; Rana Sayeed; Mario Petrou; George Krasopoulos; Vivek Srivastava; Stefan Neubauer; Christopher T Rodgers; Oliver J Rider
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Moderate Aortic Stenosis: What is it and When Should We Intervene?

Authors:  Sveeta Badiani; Sanjeev Bhattacharyya; Nikoo Aziminia; Thomas A Treibel; Guy Lloyd
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.