Literature DB >> 30284102

Comparison of linear and volumetric measurements obtained from periodontal defects by using cone beam-CT and micro-CT: an in vitro study.

M Ayşe Tayman1, Kıvanç Kamburoğlu2, Özlem Küçük3, Funda S Ö Ateş4, Meral Günhan1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess linear and volumetric measurement accuracy of periodontal defects (class 2 furcation, fenestration, dehiscence, and three-wall intrabony defect) by using CBCT and micro-CT images obtained at different voxel sizes.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We created 66 periodontal defects in human dry mandibles. Images of teeth with defects were taken by Planmeca Promox 3D Max (CBCT) at voxel sizes of 0.2 and 0.075 mm and super-argus PET/CT (micro-CT) at voxel sizes of 0.12 and 0.06 mm. All defects were then linearly (depth, width, and height) and volumetrically measured by 3D-DOCTOR software. Differences between voxels were assessed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Bland-Altman limits of agreement and ICCs were calculated to assess agreement between the methods. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Volumes measured by micro-CT (0.12-0.06 mm) were higher than those of CBCT (0.2-0.075 mm) measurements regardless of the voxel size. ICC between micro CT and CBCT methods was found to be statistically significant for all types of defects in terms of volume (p < 0.001), height (p < 0.05), width (p < 0.001), and depth measurements (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: CBCT provides useful information regarding linear and volumetric measurement of periodontal defects in vitro. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Size and volume of periodontal defects may play an important role in the determination of the most appropriate treatment plan and disease prognosis along with outcome assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cone beam computed tomography; Micro-computed tomography; Periodontal bone defects; Volumetric and linear analysis; Voxel size

Year:  2018        PMID: 30284102     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2665-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  2 in total

1.  How well do integrated 3D models predict alveolar defects after treatment with clear aligners?

Authors:  Ting Jiang; Jian Kai Wang; Yang Yang Jiang; Zheng Hu; Guo Hua Tang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Olavo César Lyra Porto; Brunno Santos de Freitas Silva; Julio Almeida Silva; Cyntia Rodrigues de Araújo Estrela; Ana Helena Gonçalves de Alencar; Mike Dos Reis Bueno; Carlos Estrela
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 2.698

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.