Margaret Nolan1, Jennifer L Ridgeway2, Karthik Ghosh3, David Martin4, David O Warner4. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. nolan.margaret@mayo.edu. 2. Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 3. Breast Clinic, Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Smoking is a risk factor for poor outcomes following breast reconstructive surgery. This project aimed to design and implement an intervention to consistently refer all breast cancer patients to tobacco treatment services. METHODS: In formative work, a set of processes for providers to consistently refer patients to a tobacco treatment specialist at the Nicotine Dependence Center (NDC) was designed. Elements included consistent documentation of smoking status, provider advice specific to the benefits of quitting to cancer care, referral to NDC using an "opt-out" strategy that emphasized smoking cessation as a standard part of breast cancer treatment, and reinforcement of the importance of the referral by multiple personnel. The number of referrals to the NDC and number of patients who attended their scheduled NDC appointment were measured before and 1 year after implementation. Qualitative evaluation was performed using semi-structured interviews with participating providers and patients regarding acceptability. RESULTS: The proportion of smoking patients referred to the NDC increased from 29% (22/75) before the intervention to 74% (20/27) afterward. Among those referred, attendance at the consultation increased from 41% (9/22) to 75% (15/20). This occurred despite provider interviews revealing knowledge gaps about the referral process and evidence of provider adaptation to accommodate personal practice. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were high. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that similar referral interventions for all cancer patients should be pursued with the aim of embedding tobacco dependence treatment seamlessly and consistently into the cancer treatment plan of every patient who smokes cigarettes.
PURPOSE: Smoking is a risk factor for poor outcomes following breast reconstructive surgery. This project aimed to design and implement an intervention to consistently refer all breast cancerpatients to tobacco treatment services. METHODS: In formative work, a set of processes for providers to consistently refer patients to a tobacco treatment specialist at the Nicotine Dependence Center (NDC) was designed. Elements included consistent documentation of smoking status, provider advice specific to the benefits of quitting to cancer care, referral to NDC using an "opt-out" strategy that emphasized smoking cessation as a standard part of breast cancer treatment, and reinforcement of the importance of the referral by multiple personnel. The number of referrals to the NDC and number of patients who attended their scheduled NDC appointment were measured before and 1 year after implementation. Qualitative evaluation was performed using semi-structured interviews with participating providers and patients regarding acceptability. RESULTS: The proportion of smoking patients referred to the NDC increased from 29% (22/75) before the intervention to 74% (20/27) afterward. Among those referred, attendance at the consultation increased from 41% (9/22) to 75% (15/20). This occurred despite provider interviews revealing knowledge gaps about the referral process and evidence of provider adaptation to accommodate personal practice. Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were high. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that similar referral interventions for all cancerpatients should be pursued with the aim of embedding tobacco dependence treatment seamlessly and consistently into the cancer treatment plan of every patient who smokes cigarettes.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Health services research; Quality improvement; Standards of care
Authors: James M Davis; Leah C Thomas; Jillian E H Dirkes; H Scott Swartzwelder Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Kathleen Gali; Brittany Pike; Matthew S Kendra; Cindy Tran; Priya Fielding-Singh; Kayla Jimenez; Rachelle Mirkin; Judith J Prochaska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-03-22 Impact factor: 3.390