Literature DB >> 30283213

A mean score method for sensitivity analysis to departures from the missing at random assumption in randomised trials.

Ian R White1,2, James Carpenter2,3, Nicholas J Horton4.   

Abstract

Most analyses of randomised trials with incomplete outcomes make untestable assumptions and should therefore be subjected to sensitivity analyses. However, methods for sensitivity analyses are not widely used. We propose a mean score approach for exploring global sensitivity to departures from missing at random or other assumptions about incomplete outcome data in a randomised trial. We assume a single outcome analysed under a generalised linear model. One or more sensitivity parameters, specified by the user, measure the degree of departure from missing at random in a pattern mixture model. Advantages of our method are that its sensitivity parameters are relatively easy to interpret and so can be elicited from subject matter experts; it is fast and non-stochastic; and its point estimate, standard error and confidence interval agree perfectly with standard methods when particular values of the sensitivity parameters make those standard methods appropriate. We illustrate the method using data from a mental health trial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intention-to-treat analysis; Longitudinal data analysis; Mean score; Missing data; Randomised trials; Sensitivity analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30283213      PMCID: PMC6166859          DOI: 10.5705/ss.202016.0308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Sin        ISSN: 1017-0405            Impact factor:   1.261


  29 in total

1.  Incorporating prior beliefs about selection bias into the analysis of randomized trials with missing outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel O Scharfstein; Michael J Daniels; James M Robins
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Modeling longitudinal data with nonignorable dropouts using a latent dropout class model.

Authors:  Jason Roy
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Missing covariate data in clinical research: when and when not to use the missing-indicator method for analysis.

Authors:  Rolf H H Groenwold; Ian R White; A Rogier T Donders; James R Carpenter; Douglas G Altman; Karel G M Moons
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: proposal for a common standard.

Authors:  Robert West; Peter Hajek; Lindsay Stead; John Stapleton
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  A comparison of two bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.

Authors:  Bing Lu; John S Preisser; Bahjat F Qaqish; Chirayath Suchindran; Shrikant I Bangdiwala; Mark Wolfson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A Bayesian sensitivity model for intention-to-treat analysis on binary outcomes with dropouts.

Authors:  Niko A Kaciroti; M Anthony Schork; Trivellore Raghunathan; Stevo Julius
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Selection models for repeated measurements with non-random dropout: an illustration of sensitivity.

Authors:  M G Kenward
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Sensitivity analysis for a partially missing binary outcome in a two-arm randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Victoria Liublinska; Donald B Rubin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Imputation methods for missing outcome data in meta-analysis of clinical trials.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Ian R White; Angela M Wood
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A review of the use of controlled multiple imputation in randomised controlled trials with missing outcome data.

Authors:  Ping-Tee Tan; Suzie Cro; Eleanor Van Vogt; Matyas Szigeti; Victoria R Cornelius
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  ACL Surgery Necessity in Non-Acute Patients (ACL SNNAP): a statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jamie R Stokes; David J Beard; Loretta Davies; Beverly A Shirkey; Andrew Price; Jonathan A Cook
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.728

3.  The impact of financial incentives on HIV incidence among adolescent girls and young women in Eswatini: Sitakhela Likusasa, a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Marelize Gorgens; Sosthenes Ketende; Andrew F Longosz; Mbuso Mabuza; Muziwethu Nkambule; Tengetile Dlamini; Kelvin Sikwibele; Vimbai Tsododo; Tendai Chipepera; Mxolisi Leroy Ndikandika; Wendy Heard; Gugu Maphalala; Lindiwe Dlamini; David Wilson; Damien de Walque; Khanya Mabuza
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2022-09

4.  Better Outcomes for Older people with Spinal Trouble (BOOST) trial: statistical analysis plan for a randomised controlled trial of a combined physical and psychological intervention for older adults with neurogenic claudication.

Authors:  Ioana R Marian; Esther Williamson; Angela Garrett; Sarah E Lamb; Susan J Dutton
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Should the nail plate be replaced or discarded after nail bed repair in children? Nail bed INJury Analysis (NINJA) randomised controlled trial: a health economic and statistical analysis plan.

Authors:  Jamie R Stokes; May Ee Png; Abhilash Jain; Aina V H Greig; Beverly A Shirkey; Melina Dritsaki; Jonathan A Cook
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.