Literature DB >> 30283105

Widespread seasonal compensation effects of spring warming on northern plant productivity.

Wolfgang Buermann1,2, Matthias Forkel3, Michael O'Sullivan4, Stephen Sitch5, Pierre Friedlingstein6, Vanessa Haverd7, Atul K Jain8, Etsushi Kato9, Markus Kautz10, Sebastian Lienert11,12, Danica Lombardozzi13, Julia E M S Nabel14, Hanqin Tian15,16, Andrew J Wiltshire17, Dan Zhu18, William K Smith19, Andrew D Richardson20,21.   

Abstract

Climate change is shifting the phenological cycles of plants1, thereby altering the functioning of ecosystems, which in turn induces feedbacks to the climate system2. In northern (north of 30° N) ecosystems, warmer springs lead generally to an earlier onset of the growing season3,4 and increased ecosystem productivity early in the season5. In situ6 and regional7-9 studies also provide evidence for lagged effects of spring warmth on plant productivity during the subsequent summer and autumn. However, our current understanding of these lagged effects, including their direction (beneficial or adverse) and geographic distribution, is still very limited. Here we analyse satellite, field-based and modelled data for the period 1982-2011 and show that there are widespread and contrasting lagged productivity responses to spring warmth across northern ecosystems. On the basis of the observational data, we find that roughly 15 per cent of the total study area of about 41 million square kilometres exhibits adverse lagged effects and that roughly 5 per cent of the total study area exhibits beneficial lagged effects. By contrast, current-generation terrestrial carbon-cycle models predict much lower areal fractions of adverse lagged effects (ranging from 1 to 14 per cent) and much higher areal fractions of beneficial lagged effects (ranging from 9 to 54 per cent). We find that elevation and seasonal precipitation patterns largely dictate the geographic pattern and direction of the lagged effects. Inadequate consideration in current models of the effects of the seasonal build-up of water stress on seasonal vegetation growth may therefore be able to explain the differences that we found between our observation-constrained estimates and the model-constrained estimates of lagged effects associated with spring warming. Overall, our results suggest that for many northern ecosystems the benefits of warmer springs on growing-season ecosystem productivity are effectively compensated for by the accumulation of seasonal water deficits, despite the fact that northern ecosystems are thought to be largely temperature- and radiation-limited10.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30283105     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0555-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  20 in total

1.  Rhizome trait scaling relationships are modulated by growth conditions and are linked to plant fitness.

Authors:  Dinesh Thakur; Zuzana Münzbergová
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Pervasive alterations to snow-dominated ecosystem functions under climate change.

Authors:  William R Wieder; Daniel Kennedy; Flavio Lehner; Keith N Musselman; Keith B Rodgers; Nan Rosenbloom; Isla R Simpson; Ryohei Yamaguchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Warm springs alter timing but not total growth of temperate deciduous trees.

Authors:  Cameron Dow; Albert Y Kim; Loïc D'Orangeville; Erika B Gonzalez-Akre; Ryan Helcoski; Valentine Herrmann; Grant L Harley; Justin T Maxwell; Ian R McGregor; William J McShea; Sean M McMahon; Neil Pederson; Alan J Tepley; Kristina J Anderson-Teixeira
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 69.504

4.  Interannual and Seasonal Drivers of Carbon Cycle Variability Represented by the Community Earth System Model (CESM2).

Authors:  William R Wieder; Zachary Butterfield; Keith Lindsay; Danica L Lombardozzi; Gretchen Keppel-Aleks
Journal:  Global Biogeochem Cycles       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.500

5.  Biophysical impacts of northern vegetation changes on seasonal warming patterns.

Authors:  Xu Lian; Sujong Jeong; Chang-Eui Park; Hao Xu; Laurent Z X Li; Tao Wang; Pierre Gentine; Josep Peñuelas; Shilong Piao
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  An earlier start of the thermal growing season enhances tree growth in cold humid areas but not in dry areas.

Authors:  Shan Gao; Eryuan Liang; Ruishun Liu; Flurin Babst; J Julio Camarero; Yongshuo H Fu; Shilong Piao; Sergio Rossi; Miaogen Shen; Tao Wang; Josep Peñuelas
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 19.100

7.  Direct and seasonal legacy effects of the 2018 heat wave and drought on European ecosystem productivity.

Authors:  A Bastos; P Ciais; P Friedlingstein; S Sitch; J Pongratz; L Fan; J P Wigneron; U Weber; M Reichstein; Z Fu; P Anthoni; A Arneth; V Haverd; A K Jain; E Joetzjer; J Knauer; S Lienert; T Loughran; P C McGuire; H Tian; N Viovy; S Zaehle
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Observed increasing water constraint on vegetation growth over the last three decades.

Authors:  Wenzhe Jiao; Lixin Wang; William K Smith; Qing Chang; Honglang Wang; Paolo D'Odorico
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Adaptive genetic variation to drought in a widely distributed conifer suggests a potential for increasing forest resilience in a drying climate.

Authors:  Claire Depardieu; Martin P Girardin; Simon Nadeau; Patrick Lenz; Jean Bousquet; Nathalie Isabel
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Constraining modelled global vegetation dynamics and carbon turnover using multiple satellite observations.

Authors:  Matthias Forkel; Markus Drüke; Martin Thurner; Wouter Dorigo; Sibyll Schaphoff; Kirsten Thonicke; Werner von Bloh; Nuno Carvalhais
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.