| Literature DB >> 30282946 |
Zhan-Biao Chen1, Pei-Yan Huang2,3, Zheng-Wei Li4, Xin-Yan Guo5, Chen Zhao6, Xiao-Hong Zheng7, Yi Yang8.
Abstract
Vehicle overload is detrimental to bridges and traffic safety. This paper presents a study on the fatigue performance of typical reinforced concrete (RC) beams of highway bridges under vehicle overload. A definition method of vehicle overload and a construction method of overload ladder spectrum were first proposed based on traffic data acquisition, statistical analysis and structural calculation of the highway bridges in Guangzhou. A fatigue experimental method was also proposed with the three-ladder vehicle overload spectrum, and the fatigue tests of 15 RC beams strengthened with carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) under three loading levels were then carried out. The fatigue performance and the failure mechanism of the strengthened beams were presented and discussed, and two fatigue life prediction methods were proposed with the established modified Palmgren-Miner rule and the loading level equivalent method respectively. The results showed that the fatigue performance of the strengthened RC beams was severely degraded under overload ladder spectrum compared with that under constant amplitude cyclic load, and the life prediction methods were proved effective.Entities:
Keywords: Vehicle overload; carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP); fatigue performance; overload ladder spectrum; reinforced concrete (RC) beams
Year: 2018 PMID: 30282946 PMCID: PMC6210669 DOI: 10.3390/s18103321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Frequency distributions of vehicle overload moments : (a) ; (b) ; (c) .
Equivalent moments and overload levels.
| Overload Intervals/ |
|
| Overload Level | Vehicle Frequencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [800, 1200] | 1052 | 577 | 0.623 | 535 |
| (1200, 1400) | 1302 | 715 | 0.682 | 81 |
| [1400, 2000) | 1506 | 828 | 0.732 | 15 |
Main parameters of the testing spectrum.
| Ladder |
|
| Stress Ratio | Ladder Length/Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 28.0 | 2.80 | 0.1 | 535 |
| II | 30.7 | 3.07 | 0.1 | 81 |
| III | 32.9 | 3.29 | 0.1 | 15 |
Figure 2Three-ladder overload testing spectrum.
Figure 3Specimen: (a) RC beam strengthened with CFL; (b) Size of CFL pasted at the bottom of RC beam.
Mechanical properties of concrete.
| Cube Compressive Strength | Elastic Modulus | Axial Compressive Strength | Flexural Strength | Flexural Modulus | Poisson’s Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45.6 MPa | 31.2 GPa | 28.9 MPa | 4.25 MPa | 28 GPa | 0.193 |
Figure 4Steel bars used in RC beam.
Basic mechanical properties of CFL.
| Tensile Strength | Elastic Modulus | Computing Thickness | Elongation Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4750 MPa | 230 GPa | 0.23 mm | 1.5% |
Figure 5Testing System.
Experimental conditions and results.
| Group No. | Specimen No. | Load Ladders | Peak Load | Loading Levels | Ladder Length | Fatigue Lives |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | A11 | I | 28.0 | 0.623 | 535 | 1,633,260 |
| A12 | 1,950,810 | |||||
| A13 | II | 30.7 | 0.682 | 81 | 816,502 | |
| A14 | 307,110 | |||||
| A15 | III | 32.9 | 0.731 | 15 | 919,355 | |
| A2 | A21 | I | 30.8 | 0.684 | 535 | 392,417 |
| A22 | 181,003 | |||||
| A23 | II | 33.8 | 0.751 | 81 | 374,291 | |
| A24 | 343,815 | |||||
| A25 | III | 36.2 | 0.804 | 15 | 417,781 | |
| A3 | A31 | I | 32.2 | 0.716 | 535 | 287,064 |
| A32 | 281,428 | |||||
| A33 | II | 35.3 | 0.784 | 81 | 386,159 | |
| A34 | 208,084 | |||||
| A35 | III | 37.8 | 0.840 | 15 | 210,078 |
Figure 6Mid-span deflection curves of specimen No. A13: (a) Peak deflection~ curves; (b) Load~Peak/valley deflection curves.
Figure 7Fatigue failure process of the strengthened beams: (a) Main crack in concrete; (b) CFL debonding; (c) The main steel bars failure.
Figure 8and curve.
Fatigue life predicting and critical damage calculating results based on Palmgren-Miner rule.
| Group No. | Loading Levels | Average Test Data | Predicted Lives | Relative Errors/% | Critical Damages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 0.623, 0.682, 0.731 | 1,125,407 | 1,691,598 | 50.3 | 0.665 |
| A2 | 0.684, 0.751, 0.804 | 341,861 | 817,801 | 139 | 0.418 |
| A3 | 0.716, 0.784, 0.840 | 274,563 | 568,541 | 107 | 0.483 |
Fatigue life predicting results by Equation (12).
| Group No. | Loading Levels | Average Test Data | Predicted Lives | Relative Errors/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 0.623, 0.682, 0.731 | 1,125,407 | 883,151 | −21.5 |
| A2 | 0.684, 0.751, 0.804 | 341,861 | 426,958 | 24.9 |
| A3 | 0.716, 0.784, 0.840 | 274,563 | 296,824 | 8.11 |
Calculating results for equivalent loading levels.
| Group No. | Overload Ladder | Loading Levels | Equivalent Loading Levels |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | I | 0.623, 0.682, 0.731 | 0.690 |
| A2 | II | 0.684, 0.751, 0.804 | 0.759 |
| A3 | III | 0.716, 0.784, 0.840 | 0.794 |
Figure 9and curve.