Literature DB >> 30282088

Radiographic Assessment Of Crestal Bone Loss In Tissue-Level Implants Restored By Platform Matching Compared With Bone-Level Implants Restored By Platform Switching: A Randomized, Controlled, Split-Mouth Trial With 3-Year Follow-Up.

Laura Lago, Luis da Silva, Isabel Martinez-Silva, Benito Rilo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This randomized, controlled, split-mouth trial with 3-year follow-up was carried out to compare radiologic changes of crestal bone level (CBL) between splinted tissue-level implants restored by platform matching and bone-level implants restored by platform switching.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Periapical radiographs were taken to evaluate the peri-implant crestal bone changes at baseline (implant restoration), at 1 year, and at 3 years after the definitive restoration.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients requiring a partial fixed dental prosthesis supported by two implants had their sites randomized according to receiving both implant types. Fifty tissue-level implants restored by platform matching, as control implants, and 50 bone-level implants restored by platform switching, as test implants, were placed. Crestal bone changes in the control group were: baseline to 3 years, 0.18 ± 0.46 mm (P = .043). In the test group, crestal bone changes were: baseline to 3 years, 0.14 ± 0.35 mm (P = .514). The mean differences between groups were: baseline to 1 year, 0.07 ± 0.23 mm (95% CI: -0.034, 0.185); 1 to 3 years, 0.01 ± 0.01 mm (95% CI: -0.055, 0.074); baseline to 3 years, 0.04 ± 0.11 mm (95% CI: -0.080, 0.150). No statistically significant differences in CBL at baseline to 1 year (P = .269), 1 year to 3 years (P = .811), and baseline to 3 years (P = .513) were observed.
CONCLUSION: In this trial, CBL changes in the tissue level control group were statistically significant only between baseline and 3-year follow-up. Meanwhile, CBL changes in the bone-level test group were not statistically significant in the different times studied. No statistically significant difference in CBL between two implant types was observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30282088     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.6954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  4 in total

1.  Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Changes around Dental Implants with Platform-Switched and Platform-Matched Abutments: A Retrospective 5-Year Radiographic Evaluation.

Authors:  Hsi-Kuei Lin; Jerry Chin-Yi Lin; Yu-Hwa Pan; Eisner Salamanca; Yi-Ting Chang; Yung-Szu Hsu; Yi-Fan Wu; Chin-Kai Lin; Odontuya Dorj; Wei-Jen Chang
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-27

Review 2.  Bone loss-related factors in tissue and bone level dental implants: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Hamed Mortazavi; Amin Khodadoustan; Aida Kheiri; Lida Kheiri
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 3.  Comparative Study by Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Peri-Implant Effect of Two Types of Platforms: Platform-Switching versus Conventional Platforms.

Authors:  Alejo Juan-Montesinos; Rubén Agustín-Panadero; Maria Fernanda Solá-Ruiz; Rocío Marco-Pitarch; Jose María Montiel-Company; Carla Fons-Badal
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Analysis of Peri-Implant Bone Loss with a Convergent Transmucosal Morphology: Retrospective Clinical Study.

Authors:  María Costa Castillo; Martín Laguna Martos; Rocío Marco Pitarch; Marina García Selva; Silvia Del Cid Rodríguez; Carla Fons-Badal; Rubén Agustín Panadero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.