Literature DB >> 30281540

Survival and Functional Status After Bridge-to-Transplant with a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Alejandro Suarez-Pierre1, Xun Zhou, Charles D Fraser, Joshua C Grimm, Todd C Crawford, Cecillia Lui, Vicente Valero, Chun W Choi, Robert S Higgins, Ahmet Kilic.   

Abstract

The use left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) as a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) has become a common modality to treat end-stage heart failure. We sought to examine the impact of BTT on long-term survival and quality of life after heart transplant. The population was all adult patients undergoing isolated heart transplantation in the United States between 2007 and 2017. Inclusion criteria covered BTT patients with a LVAD (only Heartmate II [HMII] or HeartWare Ventricular Assist System [HVAD]) and compared these with patients undergoing de novo heart transplantation. Our primary end-point was survival at 1, 2, and 5 years. Secondary end-points were functional status, return to work, and rates of hospital readmission and graft rejection. Unconditional and conditional survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. The independent influence of BTT on risk-adjusted mortality was determined using Cox proportional hazards models. In this period, 5,584 patients were bridged with an LVAD and 12,295 underwent de novo transplantation. Unconditional survival was 2% higher in de novo patients at 1, 2, and 5 years. After risk adjustment, BTT was associated with increased mortality at each time point. Unadjusted 5 year survival, conditional on 90 day survival, was similar between groups (82.6% vs. 83.4%; p = 0.15). Functional status, return to work, and unadjusted rates of hospital readmission and graft rejection were similar at 1, 2, 5 years. Bridge-to-transplant with LVADs provides excellent survival and similar quality of life to that of patients undergoing de novo heart transplantation. Bridge-to-transplant patients experience a slightly higher mortality rate within 90 days of transplantation.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30281540     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  5 in total

1.  Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device versus orthotopic heart transplantation in adults with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bufan Zhang; Shaohua Guo; Jie Ning; Yiai Li; Zhigang Liu
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

2.  Improvements in Functional Status Among Survivors of Orthotopic Heart Transplantation Following High-risk Bridging Modalities.

Authors:  Lauren V Huckaby; Gavin Hickey; Ibrahim Sultan; Arman Kilic
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 3.  Bridge to transplantation from mechanical circulatory support: a narrative review.

Authors:  Alice L Zhou; Eric W Etchill; Katherine A Giuliano; Benjamin L Shou; Kavita Sharma; Chun W Choi; Ahmet Kilic
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Impact of pretransplant left ventricular assist device support duration on outcome after heart transplantation.

Authors:  Moritz Benjamin Immohr; Hug Aubin; Sophiko Erbel-Khurtsidze; Hannan Dalyanoglu; Raphael Romano Bruno; Ralf Westenfeld; Igor Tudorache; Payam Akhyari; Udo Boeken; Artur Lichtenberg
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-02-21

5.  Incremental cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal membranous oxygenation as a bridge to cardiac transplant or left ventricular assist device placement in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Joseph Reza; Ashley Mila; Bradford Ledzian; Jingwei Sun; Scott Silvestry
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-07-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.