Literature DB >> 30280499

Application of an activity-based receptor bioassay to investigate the in vitro activity of selected indole- and indazole-3-carboxamide-based synthetic cannabinoids at CB1 and CB2 receptors.

Carolina Noble1, Annelies Cannaert2,3, Kristian Linnet1, Christophe P Stove2.   

Abstract

Synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) are the most chemically diverse group of new psychoactive substances. This group has been associated with several intoxications, many with fatal outcomes. Although advancements have been achieved in pharmacology, metabolism, and detection of these compounds in recent years, these aspects are still unresolved for many SCs. The aim of this study was to investigate the in vitro potency of 14 indole- and indazole-based SCs by applying a stable CB1 or CB2 receptor activation assay and correlating the activity with their structure. The half-maximal effective concentration (EC50 ) of 5-chloropentyl, 5-bromopentyl, and 5-iodopentyl JWH-122 analogs varied from 74.1 to 283.7 nM for CB1 and 7.05 to 23.4 nM for CB2, where the addition of a chlorine atom enhanced the potency at CB1 compared with the bromo and iodo analogs. AM-2201 was the most active at CB1 within this naphthoylindole family, with an EC50 of 23.5 nM but with the lowest efficacy (Emax 98.8%). Within the indole-3-carboxamide derivatives, 5F-MDMB-PICA was the most active compound, with a CB1/CB2 EC50 of 3.26/0.87 nM and an Emax around three times higher than JWH-018. ADB-FUBINACA was the most potent tested SC overall, with a CB1/CB2 EC50 of 0.69/0.59 nM, and an Emax around 3-fold higher than that for JWH-018 at CB1. The data obtained in this study confirm how small differences in the structure of SCs might lead to large differences in their activity, especially at CB1, which may be correlated with differences in their toxic effects in humans.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioassay; Cannabinoid receptor; New psychoactive substances; Pharmacology; Synthetic cannabinoids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30280499     DOI: 10.1002/dta.2517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Test Anal        ISSN: 1942-7603            Impact factor:   3.345


  17 in total

1.  In vitro determination of the efficacy of illicit synthetic cannabinoids at CB1 receptors.

Authors:  Shivani Sachdev; Kiran Vemuri; Samuel D Banister; Mitchell Longworth; Michael Kassiou; Marina Santiago; Alexandros Makriyannis; Mark Connor
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  In Vitro Metabolism and Hepatic Intrinsic Clearance of the Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist JWH-122 and Its Four ω-Halogenated Analogues.

Authors:  Anders Bork Davidsen; Marie Mardal; Kristian Linnet
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Do you feel it now? Route of administration and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol-like discriminative stimulus effects of synthetic cannabinoids in mice.

Authors:  Jenny L Wiley; Timothy W Lefever; Michelle Glass; Brian F Thomas
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Structure-activity relationships of valine, tert-leucine, and phenylalanine amino acid-derived synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists related to ADB-BUTINACA, APP-BUTINACA, and ADB-P7AICA.

Authors:  Eric Sparkes; Elizabeth A Cairns; Richard C Kevin; Felcia Lai; Katharina Elisabeth Grafinger; Shuli Chen; Marie H Deventer; Ross Ellison; Rochelle Boyd; Lewis J Martin; Iain S McGregor; Roy R Gerona; David E Hibbs; Volker Auwärter; Michelle Glass; Christophe Stove; Samuel D Banister
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-10-25

5.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the synthetic cannabinoid, 5F-MDMB-PICA, in male rats.

Authors:  Alex J Krotulski; Nancy Garibay; Donna Walther; Sara E Walton; Amanda L A Mohr; Barry K Logan; Michael H Baumann
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Linking in vitro and ex vivo CB1 activity with serum concentrations and clinical features in 5F-MDMB-PICA users to better understand SCRAs and their metabolites.

Authors:  Liesl K Janssens; Simon Hudson; David M Wood; Caitlin Wolfe; Paul I Dargan; Christophe P Stove
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.168

7.  Assessment of Biased Agonism among Distinct Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist Scaffolds.

Authors:  Elise Wouters; Jolien Walraed; Michael Joseph Robertson; Max Meyrath; Martyna Szpakowska; Andy Chevigné; Georgios Skiniotis; Christophe Stove
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2019-11-04

8.  Assessment of select synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist bias and selectivity between the type 1 and type 2 cannabinoid receptor.

Authors:  Ayat Zagzoog; Asher L Brandt; Tallan Black; Eunhyun D Kim; Riley Burkart; Mikin Patel; Zhiyun Jin; Maria Nikolaeva; Robert B Laprairie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS). A New Threat for Young Drug Users with Forensic-Toxicological Implications.

Authors:  Arianna Giorgetti; Jennifer P Pascali; Paolo Fais; Guido Pelletti; Andrea Gabbin; Giorgia Franchetti; Giovanni Cecchetto; Guido Viel
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14

10.  Molecular signaling of synthetic cannabinoids: Comparison of CB1 receptor and TRPV1 channel activation.

Authors:  Haley K Andersen; Kenneth B Walsh
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.