| Literature DB >> 30280114 |
Brooke J Cull1,2, Sara K Rosenkranz1,2, Richard R Rosenkranz1,2.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the effectiveness of tailored, online, video-based training on Girl Scout troop leaders' wellness promotion self-efficacy, intention, and knowledge regarding physical activity and fruit and vegetable practices during troop meetings. Design: Randomized controlled trial.Entities:
Keywords: nutrition; physical activity; wellness promotion; wellness training
Year: 2018 PMID: 30280114 PMCID: PMC6141553 DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.225
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIMS Public Health ISSN: 2327-8994
Wellness-training video content and associated behavior change techniques.
| Training Video Content | Behavior Change Techniques |
| Recommendations for health behavior identified | Provide information about behavior in general Provide normative information about others' behavior |
| Benefits of incorporating wellness practice | Provide information about the behavior specific to the individual |
| Discussion of leader-specified barrier to wellness practice, and solutions for overcoming it | Barrier identification/problem-solving |
| Links to videos and pictures depicting other troops' activities and ideas to overcome the same barrier | Provide instruction on performing behavior Model/demonstrate behavior |
| Reflection on troop's usual practice and where improvement can be made | Review of behavioral goals Feedback on performance |
| Specific goal setting for upcoming troop meeting | Behavioral goal setting Action planning Set graded tasks Time management |
| Encouragement for troop leader | Rewards contingent on effort or progress toward behavior Social support |
Baseline troop characteristics.
| Control ( | Intervention ( | |
| Troop Level | ||
| Daisy (K–1st Grade) | 2 (12.5%) | 0 (0%) |
| Brownie (2nd–3rd Grade) | 9 (56.3%) | 5 (35.7%) |
| Junior (4th–5th Grade) | 3 (18.8%) | 5 (35.7%) |
| Cadette (6th–8th Grade) | 2 (12.5%) | 3 (21.4%) |
| Leader SES | ||
| Low-income | 8 (43.8%) | 6 (42.9%) |
| Not low-income | 7 (50.0%) | 6 (42.9%) |
| Unreported | 1 (6.3%) | 2 (14.3%) |
| Fruit Availability During Meetings | ||
| Rarely or Never | 4 (25%) | 5 (35.7%) |
| At Least Sometimes | 12 (75%) | 9 (64.3%) |
| Vegetable Availability During Meetings | ||
| Rarely or Never | 11 (68.8%) | 5 (35.7%) |
| At Least Sometimes | 5 (31.3%) | 9 (64.3%) |
| Physical Activity Opportunity During Meetings | ||
| Rarely or Never | 2 (12.5%) | 1 (7.1%) |
| At Least Sometimes | 14 (87.5%) | 13 (92.9%) |
Self-efficacy by condition and time.
| Self-Efficacy Category | CON Baseline | CON Post | INT Baseline | INT Post |
| PA Practices | 65.4 ± 18.0 | 70.2 ± 15.9 | 69.6 ± 21.9 | 74.6 ± 21.1 |
| PA Barriers† | 73.8 ± 19.0 | 68.1 ± 20.9 | 69.3 ± 18.4 | 83.6 ± 13.2 |
| Fruit Practices | 64.1 ± 28.3 | 57.5 ± 26.8 | 60.9 ± 29.9 | 62.0 ± 28.7 |
| Vegetable Practices† | 57.8 ± 31.0 | 52.3 ± 31.6 | 54.1 ± 27.7 | 59.0 ± 29.7 |
| FV Barriers† | 67.7 ± 27.8 | 68.7 ± 18.1 | 60.8 ± 23.4 | 72.4 ± 29.8 |
Note: †Significant condition x time interaction (p < 0.05). INT group had greater increases in self-efficacy related to PA barriers, vegetable practices, and FV barriers.
Figure 1.Percentage of leaders with positive PA and FV intentions.