OBJECTIVE: Excessive mitochondrial fission has been associated with several neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington's disease (HD). Consequently, mitochondrial dynamics has been suggested to be a promising therapeutic target for Huntington's disease. Mitochondrial fission depends on recruitment of Drp1 to mitochondria, and Mff (mitochondrial fission factor) is one of the key adaptor proteins for this process. Removal of Mff therefore greatly reduces mitochondrial fission. Here we investigate whether removal of Mff can mitigate HD-associated pathologies in HD transgenic mice (R6/2) expressing mutant Htt. METHOD: We compared the phenotype of HD mice with and without Mff. The mice were monitored for lifespan, neurological phenotypes, Htt aggregate formation, and brain histology. RESULTS: We found that HD mice lacking Mff display more severe neurological phenotypes and have shortened lifespans. Loss of Mff does not affect mutant Htt aggregation, but it accelerates HD pathology, including neuronal loss and neuroinflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate a protective role for mitochondrial fission in HD and suggest that more studies are needed before manipulation of mitochondrial dynamics can be applied to HD therapy.
OBJECTIVE: Excessive mitochondrial fission has been associated with several neurodegenerative diseases, including Huntington's disease (HD). Consequently, mitochondrial dynamics has been suggested to be a promising therapeutic target for Huntington's disease. Mitochondrial fission depends on recruitment of Drp1 to mitochondria, and Mff (mitochondrial fission factor) is one of the key adaptor proteins for this process. Removal of Mff therefore greatly reduces mitochondrial fission. Here we investigate whether removal of Mff can mitigate HD-associated pathologies in HDtransgenic mice (R6/2) expressing mutant Htt. METHOD: We compared the phenotype of HDmice with and without Mff. The mice were monitored for lifespan, neurological phenotypes, Htt aggregate formation, and brain histology. RESULTS: We found that HDmice lacking Mff display more severe neurological phenotypes and have shortened lifespans. Loss of Mff does not affect mutant Htt aggregation, but it accelerates HD pathology, including neuronal loss and neuroinflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate a protective role for mitochondrial fission in HD and suggest that more studies are needed before manipulation of mitochondrial dynamics can be applied to HD therapy.
Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant, neurodegenerative disease
characterized by progressive, abnormal involuntary movements (chorea), rigidity,
cognitive decline, and psychiatric symptoms1. There is marked loss of neurons in the caudate nucleus, putamen, and
cerebral cortex2,3. The disease is caused by a CAG triplet
expansion in exon 1 of the HTT (huntingtin)
gene4. This mutation results in an
enlarged stretch of polyglutamines in the N-terminus of Htt, with the length
correlating with severity of disease. Disease alleles containing 40 or more CAG
repeats are fully penetrant1,5. There is
evidence that Htt with an expanded polyglutamine region impairs neuronal function
via a toxic gain-of-function effect, in part because polyglutamine repeats are prone
to aggregation. Mutant Htt has been shown to interact with multiple proteins and to
interfere with both cytoplasmic and nuclear functions6. Mutant Htt associates with mitochondria7, and this organelle is among the potential
cellular targets of mutant Htt. HD mutant cells have been shown to have defective
mitochondrial function, including ATP production8, calcium handling8,9, transport7,10,11 and
dynamics10,11,12,13.Mitochondria are dynamic organelles whose functions are dependent on appropriate
balancing of fusion versus fission14,15. Mitochondrial
fission is mediated by Drp1 (dynamin related protein 1), a large GTP hydrolyzing
enzyme of the dynamin superfamily. During mitochondrial fission, Drp1 is recruited
from the cytosol onto the mitochondrial surface by one of several outer membrane
proteins that serve as Drp1 receptors. There are currently four putative Drp1
receptors--Fis1, Mff, MiD49, and MiD5114.
Although Fis1 clearly functions to recruit the Drp1 ortholog, Dnm1p, in yeast, its
role in mammalian cells is currently unclear. Cells lacking Fis1 show little or no
defect in mitochondrial fission16,17. Mff has a
prominent role in recruiting Drp1, and cells lacking Mff show elongated
mitochondrial tubules and have substantially less Drp1 on mitochondria16,17. MiD49 and MiD51 also recruit Drp1, but the recruited Drp1
appears to be kept, at least initially, in an inactive state17,18.Expression of mutant Htt appears to result in aberrantly increased mitochondrial
fission. HDpatient cells, as well as cells engineered to express mutant Htt, show
mitochondrial fragmentation due to activation of Drp110,11.
Mutant Htt physically interacts with Drp1 and elevates its GTP hydrolysis
activity10,11. Two studies suggest that inhibiting
mitochondrial fission has therapeutic effects in HD cell and animal models. First,
in cultured striatal neurons expressing mutant Htt, treatment with the Drp1
inhibitor Mdivi1 (mitochondrial division inhibitor 1) improved mitochondrial
morphology, reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS), and improved cell viability19. A recent report, however, questions the
specificity of Mdivi1 by showing that it has effects on mitochondrial respiration
and ROS production unrelated to its activity against Drp120. Second, treatment of cell and mouse models of HD with
P110, a peptide inhibitor of Drp1, restored normal mitochondrial morphology,
improved mousebehavioral deficits, and prolonged lifespan21. P110 was designed to block the interaction of Drp1 with
Fis122. As noted above, Fis1 is a
mitochondrial outer membrane protein postulated to recruit Drp1 from the cytosol
onto the mitochondrial surface. These findings have raised the intriguing
possibility that mitochondrial fission is an attractive therapeutic target for HDpatients.Given these results showing the functional importance of Drp1 in HD pathogenesis, we
tested whether removal of Mff could ameliorate the neurological phenotypes found in
the HDR6/2 mouse model. Surprisingly, we find that
removal of Mff worsened the neurological phenotypes of HDmice. Although loss of Mff did not increase the number of Htt-positive
aggregates, it was associated with increased neuronal loss, astrogliosis, and
neuroinflammation.
METHODS
Transgenic miceFemale mice with ovaries transplanted from HDmice
were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor).
Mffmice lack all Mff isoforms, and their
generation has been described15 . Ovarian
transplanted (OT) HD females were crossed with
Mff males to generate
Mff, HD
males. Mff females were crossed with
Mff, HD
males to generate the following littermate cohorts:
Mff;Mff,
HD;Mff;
Mff,
HD. Both the
Mff and
HD lines are on mixed genetic backgrounds.
The CAG repeat numbers in the relevant cohorts were determined by genomic DNA
analysis by Laragen (Culver City, CA). The average CAG repeat number did not vary
significantly between the HD and
Mff,
HD cohorts and are noted in the
figure legends.Four cohorts of 15 animals were used. This study was approved by the Caltech
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, and mouse maintenance and experiments
were conducted in accordance with approved protocols. Humane endpoints were
established and included >15% weight loss, >10% dehydration, pain, distress,
or inability to ambulate. None of the experimental animals met these criteria.
Cohorts were sacrificed by CO2 inhalation at 12 weeks for histological
and biochemical analysis.
Behavioral analysis and sample preparation
Body weight measurement and clasping assessment were evaluated weekly from 6-11 weeks
of age. The clasping assessment test was performed by suspending mice by the tail
for 30 s and then recording hindlimb clasping behavior. Grip strength measurement
and the open field test were evaluated at 10 weeks of age. For the grip strength
test, mice were placed towards the pull bar (Chatillon grip strength meter, Columbus
instruments), and forelimb grip forces were measured until they released their grip
from the bar. For the Open Field test, mice were allowed to move around the chamber
freely. Total travelled distance was recorded with a digital camera using EthoVision
software (Noldus).For biochemical analysis, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane,
sacrificed, and transcardially perfused with ice-cold PBS. The striatum was
microdissected from the right hemispheres and stored at -80°C until Western blot
analysis. Left hemispheres were post-fixed with formalin (Sigma-Aldrich) and
processed for immunohistochemistry.ImmunohistochemistrySerial 30 μM coronal brain tissue sections were cut with a cryowmicrotome (Microm
HM550, Thermo Scientific). For visualization of target molecules, brain tissue
sections were immunostained with the following primary antibodies: EM48 (1:1000;
Millipore), anti-NeuN (1:1000; Millipore), anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein
(GFAP; 1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-ionizedcalcium binding adaptor molecule-1
(Iba-1; 1:500, Wako). Fluorescent conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from
Thermo Fisher: goat-anti-mouseAlexa 488 (1:500) and goat-anti-rabbitAlexa 568
(1:500). All stained sections were mounted on micro slides (VWR) with Fluro-Gel
(EMS). For Nissl staining, tissue sections were washed with PBS and mounted on micro
slides (VWR). Slides were dried at room temperature for overnight and stained with
cresyl violet (Sigma-Aldrich) for 3 min. Stained sections were cover-slipped in
micro slides (VWR) with xylene-based mounting medium.Western blottingMouse brains were lysed in 1% Triton X-100 buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1% Triton
X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 0.2 mM PMSF) containing protease inhibitors
(Sigma-Aldrich). After centrifugation at 15,000 x gfor 20 min at 4 °C, the
supernatant was collected as the Triton-soluble fraction. The Triton-insoluble
pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 4% SDS
buffer. Protein concentrations were determined with the DCTMprotein assay kit
(Bio-Rad). Protein samples were separated on NuPAGE 3–8% Tris-Acetate gels (Thermo
Fisher) and transferred to a PVDF membrane. Membranes were incubated with the
following primary antibodies: EM48 (1:1000; Millipore), anti-beta-actin (1:10000,
Sigma-Aldrich). Immunoreactivity was visualized by a chemiluminescent HRP substrate
(Millipore).Quantification of ImmunoreactivityFor quantification of immunoreactivity, tissue sections were obtained from the
striatum. Five random acquisition areas in the striatum were considered for each
tissue section. NeuN-positive or Nissl-positive neurons were counted using ImageJ
software (National Institutes of Health). To quantify the GFAP or Iba-1-positive
areas, the immunofluorescence region in the striatum was analyzed using the ImageJ
software (National Institutes of Health).Statistical analysisStatistical significance of data was analyzed with ANOVA test by Prism 6 software
(GraphPad). Results are presented as means ± standard error of the mean. Survival of
different cohorts were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival and log-rank analysis.
RESULTS
Removal of Mff exacerbates behavioral phenotypes in the mouseIn addition to weight loss, the mouseHD model has
been documented to have several features of neurological disease, including limb
clasping behavior, reduced forelimb grip strength, and diminished spontaneous motor
activity. To address the effect of Mff on HD pathology, we designed a mating scheme
to generate HDmice lacking Mff. In
a previous study15, we engineered a mouse
line (Mff) containing a gene trap insertion within
the Mff locus that constitutively eliminates expression of all Mff
protein isoforms, results in secondary reduction of Drp1 levels, and causes a severe
mitochondrial fission defect. We first crossed Mffmice with ovarian transplanted females that were hemizygous for
HD to generate
Mff, HD males.
These males were crossed with Mff females to
generate experimental (Mff,
HD) and control
(Mff; HD;
Mff) animals (Fig 1A).(A) Ovarian transplanted (OT)
HD females were
mated to Mff males to
generate Mff,
HD males.
Mff,
HDmales were then mated to
Mff females to
generate control (Mff;
Mff,
HD;
Mff) and experimental animals
(Mff,
HD). (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curve
of mice of the indicated cohorts. n = 15 for all
groups. The p value represents the log-rank comparison
of survival between the
HD and
MffHDmice. Abbreviations:
****, p < 0.0001. The average CAG repeat sizes for
the HD and
Mffgt/gt,
HD cohorts were
127.6 and 126.8, respectively.To determine whether removal of Mff altered the life span in
HDmice, we evaluated longevity and found
that Mff, HDmice
began dying several weeks earlier than HDmice and
lived to only ~12 weeks (Fig 1B). In contrast to wildtype mice,
HDmice show moderate weight loss between
weeks 6-11 (Fig. 2A). The weights of Mffmice also
lag behind wildtype mice, consistent with our previous results15. Interestingly, Mffmice showed a more severe weight loss than either
of these mutant mice (Fig 2A; p=0.002). Furthermore,
Mff, HDmice
exhibited markedly higher clasping behavior from 8 to 11 weeks, compared to
HDmice (Fig 2B).
Mff, HDmice were significantly weaker than either Mff or
HDmice in forelimb grip force (Fig 2C). Mff,
HDmice also showed less spontaneous
activity than HDmice when allowed to explore an
open field chamber, although the result did not reach statistical significance (Fig
2D). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the Mff knockout exacerbates
the behavioral and neurological phenotypes of HDmice.(A) Body weight in male mice was measured at 6-11 weeks of age.
n = 7 for Mff;
n = 4 for HD;
n = 7 for Mff;
n=4 for
Mff,
HD. (B) Clasping behavior was
evaluated upon tail suspension at 6-11 weeks of age. n
= 9 for all groups. (C) Forelimb grip strength in male mice was examined
by a force gauge machine at 11 weeks of age. n = 7 for
Mff; n = 4 for
HD;
n = 7 for
Mff;
n=4 for
Mff,
HD. (D) Spontaneous
activity by evaluated by recording the total travelled distance during
an open field test at 11 weeks of age. n = 9 for all
groups. Error bars represent the mean s.e.m. Abbreviations: n.s., not
significant; ****, p < 0.0001; ##,
p < 0.01 versus
Mff,
HD. For (A) and (C), the
HD and
Mff,
HDmice had average CAG repeat sizes
of 127.5 and 127.5, respectively; for (B) and (D), 127.3 and 126.0,
respectively.Modulation of Mff does not alter mutant Htt aggregation inTo examine the impact of Mff modulation on mutant huntingtin aggregation, we isolated
the striatum of each mice and performed immunoblot analysis. In
HDmice, the detergent-insoluble fraction of
the striatum showed high accumulation of mutant Htt aggregates. The levels were
unchanged in Mff,
HDmice (Fig 3A). Using the EM48 antibody to
visualize Htt aggregates in striatal sections, we found that the number of Htt
inclusions in HDmice was unchanged by removal of
Mff (Fig 3B). Thus, even though loss of Mff increases the severity of the
neurological phenotype in the HD model,
immunohistochemical and biochemical assays indicate that it does not affect
deposition of mutant Htt aggregates.(A) Western blot analysis of insoluble mutant Htt aggregates in striatal
brain lysates. Two samples are shown for each genotype. Tubulin was used
as a loading control. (B) Immunostaining of mutant Htt aggregates.
Coronal brain sections were stained with the EM48 antibody to detect Htt
aggregates. Scale bar = 40 μm. (C) Quantification of EM48-positive area
(n = 4 per group). Error bars represent the mean s.e.m. Abbreviations:
n.s., not significant. For Figures 3-5, the average CAG repeat sizes for
the HDR6/2 and Mffgt/gt, HDR6/2 mice were 127.25 and 126.0,
respectively.Loss of Mff increases neuronal loss and inflammation inPrevious studies showed that HDmice exhibited extensive neuronal loss in the
striatum area23,24. To test whether Mff influences
progressive neuronal loss, we performed immunohistochemistry of brain sections among
each group with an antibody against NeuN, a neuronal marker protein. Quantitative
analysis revealed that HDmice showed a decreased
number of NeuN-positive neurons relative to wildtype mice, in agreement with
previous studies [23, 24] (Fig 4A). Furthermore,
Mff, HDmice
contained markedly fewer (~25%) NeuN-positive neurons compared to
HDmice. Subsequent examinations with Nissl
staining showed similar results (Fig 4B).(A) Immunohistochemical staining for NeuN, a neuronal marker (left).
Scale bar = 200 μm. Bar graph shows quantification of NeuN-positive cell
number (right). n = 4 per group. (B) Representative images of Nissl
stained neurons (left). Scale bar = 200 μm. Bar graph shows
quantification of Nissl-positive cell number. n = 4 per group. Error
bars represent the mean s.e.m.Accumulation of mutant Htt has been suggested to cause neuroinflammation that
potentially promotes neurotoxicity in HD25,26,27.
Neuroinflammation manifests as elevated astrocyte and microglia activation28. To measure the neuroinflammatory
response, we performed immunostaining with GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein),
an astrocyte marker (Fig 5A), and Iba-1 (ionizedcalcium binding adaptor
molecule-1), a microglia marker (Fig 5B). Interestingly, we found significantly
elevated GFAP and Iba-1 immunoreactivity in Mff,
HDmice compared to HDmice. These results
suggest that Mff depletion promotes loss of neurons and an elevated
neuroinflammatory response in HDmice.Loss of Mff exacerbates astrogliosis and inflammation. (A)
Immunohistochemical staining for GFAP, an astrocyte marker (left). Scale
bar = 100 μm. Bar graph shows quantification of GFAP-positive area
(right). n = 4 per group. (B) Immunohistochemical label
for Iba-1, a marker for TFNγ-induced marker of activated microglia
(left). Scale bar = 100 μm. Bar graph shows quantification of
Iba-1-positive area (right). n = 4 per group. Error
bars represent the mean s.e.m.
DISCUSSION
HD cells have been shown to have aberrantly increased mitochondrial fragmentation, an
effect attributed to increased activation of Drp1 and fission10,11.
Given that peptide-based inhibition of Drp1 has been reported to ameliorate the
neurological symptoms and mortality of HD mice21, we wondered whether a similar effect
would be found with removal of Mff. Mff is a major receptor for Drp1, and embryonic
fibroblasts from our Mffmice have substantially reduced recruitment of Drp1 and fission
activity16,17. Its role in mitochondrial fission has
been shown in a variety of cultured cells from Drosophila, human, and mouse, and it
is expressed in the mammalian brain30.
However, we found no evidence that removal of Mff could improve the phenotype of
HDmice. We found instead that loss of Mff
resulted in more severe neurological symptoms and earlier lethality. Loss of Mff did
not increase the levels of aggregated Htt, but did increase loss of neurons,
astrogliosis, and neuroinflammation.P110 was designed to block a putative interaction between Drp1 and Fis122. The function of Fis1 in Drp1 recruitment
to mitochondria remains unclear, due to the observation that cells lacking Fis1 show
little or no defect in Drp1 recruitment or mitochondrial fission16,17. It remains possible that Fis1 does play a role in
mitochondrial fission in specialized cell types or under particular cellular stress
conditions. P110 has also been shown bind recombinant Drp1 directly and inhibit its
GTP hydrolysis activity22. More work will
be required to understand the mechanism through which P110 affects the phenotype of
HDmice.Our results indicate that loss of Mff aggravates the neurological symptoms of
HDmice. Therefore, although there is evidence that inhibition of Drp1
function can improve the phenotype of HD mice21, Mff seems to not be the relevant Drp1
receptor for this effect. The P110 results suggest a role for Fis1. MiD49 and MiD51
also remain possibilities. It is currently unclear why there are potentially four
Drp1 receptors, with each playing a role in mitochondrial fission17,31,32.
This diversity of Drp1 receptors may allow regulation of Drp1 function to be
tailored to the cellular state. For example, Mff, MiD49, and MiD51 have different
effects on Drp1 function upon recruitment. Unlike Mff, MiD49 and MiD51 have
inhibitory effects on Drp1 function17,31 , and MiD51
has been shown to inhibit the GTP hydrolysis activity of Drp1 [30]. Additional
stimuli are presumably necessary to activate Drp1 once it has been recruited by
MiD49 or MiD51. MiD49 and MiD51 also appear to play stronger roles in mediating
mitochondrial fission during apoptosis compared to Mff32.Our results further suggest that Mff is protective in the context of Htt containing
an expanded polyglutamine repeat. With Mff is removed, there is increased neuronal
cell loss, increased astrogliosis, and increased expression of neuroinflammatory
markers. These detrimental effects may arise because loss of Mff upsets the delicate
balance between mitochondrial fusion and fission, and as a result neurons are less
able to cope with Htt aggregates. Our previous mouse studies suggest that an
appropriate balance between these opposing processes is critical for mitochondrial
health. Multiple setpoints for fusion versus fission are compatible with
mitochondrial function, but the levels have to been carefully balanced15.
Mffmice show reduced
respiratory chain function, as shown in cardiomyocytes, and this dysfunction is
associated with reduced mitochondrial density and aberrant mitophagy17. If these cellular defects extend to
neurons, they may help to explain the worsening of the
HD phenotype.
CONCLUSIONS
Although inhibition of mitochondrial fission has been proposed as a therapeutic
approach for HD, we find that removal of Mff, a mitochondrial fission factor,
exacerbates the neurological phenotypes of
HDmice.Therefore, our
results indicate that a deeper understanding of mitochondrial dynamics in HD is
required before mitochondrial fission can be considered a therapeutic avenue for
HD.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data for graphs in Figures 1-5 are available at
https://figshare.com/s/584ca97ed838e5de3bde, with DOI:
10.6084/m9.figshare.6052007.
Competing Interests Statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding
This work was funded by grant A-11059 from the CHDI Foundation
(https://chdifoundation.org). The funder had no role in study design, data
collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Authors: P Hemachandra Reddy; Tejaswini P Reddy; Maria Manczak; Marcus J Calkins; Ulziibat Shirendeb; Peizhong Mao Journal: Brain Res Rev Date: 2010-12-08
Authors: Catherine S Palmer; Kirstin D Elgass; Robert G Parton; Laura D Osellame; Diana Stojanovski; Michael T Ryan Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Wenjun Song; Jin Chen; Alejandra Petrilli; Geraldine Liot; Eva Klinglmayr; Yue Zhou; Patrick Poquiz; Jonathan Tjong; Mahmoud A Pouladi; Michael R Hayden; Eliezer Masliah; Mark Ellisman; Isabelle Rouiller; Robert Schwarzenbacher; Blaise Bossy; Guy Perkins; Ella Bossy-Wetzel Journal: Nat Med Date: 2011-02-20 Impact factor: 53.440