| Literature DB >> 30279940 |
Charlini S Hartz1, Márcio A G Sindorf1, Charles R Lopes1,2, José Batista1, Marlene A Moreno1.
Abstract
Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is a strategy that has been used to improve performance in different sports modalities. This study investigated the effects of an IMT program on respiratory muscle strength and resistance as well as aerobic physical performance (PP) of handball athletes. Nineteen 20 ± 3 year-old male athletes were allocated into an experimental (EG, n = 10) or a placebo group (PG, n = 9). Their respiratory muscle strength was evaluated by measuring the maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), muscular respiratory resistance by maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) and aerobic PP by the cardiopulmonary exercise test. The study was designed to evaluate the effects of a 12-week IMT program with five sessions a week. A significant difference was observed in the pre and post IMT values of the MIP (170 ± 34 to 262 ± 33 cmH2O) and MEP (177 ± 36 to 218 ± 37 cmH2O) in the EG, and MIP (173 ± 45 to 213 ± 21 cmH2O) in the PG, with a large effect size for the MIP, when the groups were compared. MVV showed a significant increase (162 ± 24 to 173 ± 30 L) in the EG, with a small effect size. There was a significant difference in maximum oxygen uptake (54 ± 8 to 60 ± 7 ml/kg/min) in aerobic PP. Oxygen uptake at the respiratory compensation point (RCP) (46 ± 6 to 50 ± 5 ml/kg/min), with a moderate effect size for both variables, was observed in the EG after IMT. We concluded that IMT provided a significant increase in respiratory muscle strength and resistance, contributing to increased aerobic PP in the EG, which suggests that IMT could be incorporated in handball players' training.Entities:
Keywords: aerobic capacity; athletic performance; respiratory muscles; sports
Year: 2018 PMID: 30279940 PMCID: PMC6162985 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2018-0005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Comparison of the maximum respiratory pressure values between the PG and EG pre and post IMT. Analysis of the effect of size of the training between the groups
| PG | EG | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Pre | Post | ES | Pre | Post | ES |
| MIP (cmH2O) | 173 ± 44 | 213 ± 21 | 1.14 | 170 ± 34.3 | 262 ± 33 | 2.73 |
| MEP (cmH2O) | 188 ± 58 | 206 ± 54 | 0.30 | 177 ± 36 | 218±37 | 1.12 |
| MVV (L) | 175 ± 33 | 181 ± 25 | 0.20 | 162 ± 25 | 174±30 | 0.39 |
MIP = maximum inspiratory pressure; MEP = maximum expiratory pressure; MVV = maximum voluntary ventilation ES = Effect of size comparison pre and post training.
p < 0.05: comparison between pre and post training
p < 0.05: comparison between the groups post training
Comparison of the variables of the cardiopulmonary test between the PG and EG pre and post IMT. Analysis of the effect size between the groups
| PG | EG | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Pre | Post | ES | Pre | Post | ES |
| VOmax (mL/kg/min) | 55.3 ± 4.5 | 53.8 ± 6.1 | 0.18 | 54.0 ± 8.9 | 60.0 ± 7.1 | 0.85 |
| HR VO2max (bpm) | 191 ± 7 | 192 ±7 | 0 | 193 ± 7 | 195 ± 7 | 0.27 |
| i VO2max (km/h) | 14.6 ± 0.8 | 14.33 ± 0.9 | 0 | 14.9 ± 1.4 | 15.6 ± 0.9 | 0 |
| VT (mL/kg/min) | 39.1 ± 3.2 | 39.41 ± 4.1 | 0 | 39.8 ± 6.1 | 40.5 ± 3.1 | 0 |
| HR VT (bpm) | 172 ± 11 | 169 ± 10 | 0.27 | 167 ± 11 | 170 ± 8 | 0.29 |
| i VT (km/h) | 10.9 ± 0.5 | 10.8 ± 0.8 | 0 | 10.7 ± 0.5 | 11.1 ± 0.5 | 0 |
| RCP (mL/kg/min) | 45.9 ± 3.2 | 46.9 ± 3.6 | 0.29 | 46.8 ± 6.7 | 50.3 ± 5.2 | 0.50 |
| HR RCP (bpm) | 180 ± 8 | 184 ± 5 | 0.55 | 181 ± 12 | 186 ± 9 | 0.36 |
| i RCP (km/h) | 12.8 ± 0.6 | 12.7 ± 0.6 | 0 | 13.0 ± 1.1 | 13.5 ± 0.7 | 0 |
VO2max = maximum oxygen uptake; VT = ventilatory threshold; RCP = respiratory compensation point; HR = heart rate; i = intensity. ES = Effect of size comparison pre and post training.
p < 0.05: values between pre and post training
p < 0.05: comparison between the groups in the post training condition