Antígona Martínez1, Pablo A Gaspar1, Steven A Hillyard1, Søren K Andersen1, Javier Lopez-Calderon1, Cheryl M Corcoran1, Daniel C Javitt1. 1. From the Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, N.Y.; the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York; the Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Chile, Santiago; the Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla; the School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom; the Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca; and the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The ability to perceive the motion of biological objects, such as faces, is a critical component of daily function and correlates with the ability to successfully navigate social situations (social cognition). Deficits in motion perception in schizophrenia were first demonstrated about 20 years ago but remain understudied, especially in the early, potentially prodromal, stages of the illness. The authors examined the neural bases of visual sensory processing impairments, including motion, in patients with schizophrenia (N=63) and attenuated psychosis (clinical high risk) (N=32) compared with age-matched healthy control subjects (N=67). METHOD: Electrophysiological recordings during stimulus and motion processing were analyzed using oscillatory (time frequency) approaches that differentiated motion-onset-evoked activity from stimulus-onset sensory-evoked responses. These were compared with functional MRI (fMRI) measures of motion processing. RESULTS: Significant deficits in motion processing were observed across the two patient groups, and these deficits predicted impairments in both face-emotion recognition and cognitive function. In contrast to motion processing, sensory-evoked stimulus-onset responses were intact in patients with attenuated psychosis, and, further, the relative deficit in motion-onset responses compared with stimulus-onset responses predicted transition to schizophrenia. In patients with schizophrenia, motion detection deficits mapped to impaired activation in motion-sensitive visual cortex during fMRI. Additional visual impairments in patients with schizophrenia, not present in patients with attenuated psychosis, implicated other visual regions, including the middle occipital gyrus and pulvinar thalamic nucleus. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings emphasize the importance of sensory-level visual dysfunction in the etiology of schizophrenia and in the personal experience of individuals with the disorder and demonstrate that motion-processing deficits may predate illness onset and contribute to impaired function even in patients with attenuated psychosis.
OBJECTIVE: The ability to perceive the motion of biological objects, such as faces, is a critical component of daily function and correlates with the ability to successfully navigate social situations (social cognition). Deficits in motion perception in schizophrenia were first demonstrated about 20 years ago but remain understudied, especially in the early, potentially prodromal, stages of the illness. The authors examined the neural bases of visual sensory processing impairments, including motion, in patients with schizophrenia (N=63) and attenuated psychosis (clinical high risk) (N=32) compared with age-matched healthy control subjects (N=67). METHOD: Electrophysiological recordings during stimulus and motion processing were analyzed using oscillatory (time frequency) approaches that differentiated motion-onset-evoked activity from stimulus-onset sensory-evoked responses. These were compared with functional MRI (fMRI) measures of motion processing. RESULTS: Significant deficits in motion processing were observed across the two patient groups, and these deficits predicted impairments in both face-emotion recognition and cognitive function. In contrast to motion processing, sensory-evoked stimulus-onset responses were intact in patients with attenuated psychosis, and, further, the relative deficit in motion-onset responses compared with stimulus-onset responses predicted transition to schizophrenia. In patients with schizophrenia, motion detection deficits mapped to impaired activation in motion-sensitive visual cortex during fMRI. Additional visual impairments in patients with schizophrenia, not present in patients with attenuated psychosis, implicated other visual regions, including the middle occipital gyrus and pulvinar thalamic nucleus. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings emphasize the importance of sensory-level visual dysfunction in the etiology of schizophrenia and in the personal experience of individuals with the disorder and demonstrate that motion-processing deficits may predate illness onset and contribute to impaired function even in patients with attenuated psychosis.
Authors: Migyung Lee; Pejman Sehatpour; Elisa C Dias; Gail S Silipo; Joshua T Kantrowitz; Antigona M Martinez; Daniel C Javitt Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Antígona Martínez; Steven A Hillyard; Elisa C Dias; Donald J Hagler; Pamela D Butler; David N Guilfoyle; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Gail Silipo; Daniel C Javitt Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: C M Corcoran; J G Keilp; J Kayser; C Klim; P D Butler; G E Bruder; R C Gur; D C Javitt Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Kristin M Healey; David L Penn; Diana Perkins; Scott W Woods; Richard S E Keefe; Jean Addington Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2018-02-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Zhongming Liu; Jacco A de Zwart; Bing Yao; Peter van Gelderen; Li-Wei Kuo; Jeff H Duyn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-08-17 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Colleen A Brenner; Giri P Krishnan; Jenifer L Vohs; Woo-Young Ahn; William P Hetrick; Sandra L Morzorati; Brian F O'Donnell Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Antígona Martínez; Pablo A Gaspar; Steven A Hillyard; Stephan Bickel; Peter Lakatos; Elisa C Dias; Daniel C Javitt Journal: Front Hum Neurosci Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Gaurav H Patel; Sophie C Arkin; Daniel R Ruiz-Betancourt; Heloise M DeBaun; Nicole E Strauss; Laura P Bartel; Jack Grinband; Antigona Martinez; Rebecca A Berman; David A Leopold; Daniel C Javitt Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Elisa C Dias; Abraham C Van Voorhis; Filipe Braga; Julianne Todd; Javier Lopez-Calderon; Antigona Martinez; Daniel C Javitt Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Philip R Szeszko; Suril Gohel; Daniel H Vaccaro; King-Wai Chu; Cheuk Y Tang; Kim E Goldstein; Antonia S New; Larry J Siever; Margaret McClure; M Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez; M Mehmet Haznedar; William Byne; Erin A Hazlett Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2022-02-19 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: Gaurav H Patel; Sophie C Arkin; Daniel R Ruiz-Betancourt; Fabiola I Plaza; Safia A Mirza; Daniel J Vieira; Nicole E Strauss; Casimir C Klim; Juan P Sanchez-Peña; Laura P Bartel; Jack Grinband; Antigona Martinez; Rebecca A Berman; Kevin N Ochsner; David A Leopold; Daniel C Javitt Journal: Brain Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Daniel C Javitt; Steven J Siegel; Kevin M Spencer; Daniel H Mathalon; L Elliot Hong; Antigona Martinez; Cindy L Ehlers; Atheir I Abbas; Tobias Teichert; Peter Lakatos; Thilo Womelsdorf Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 8.294