Literature DB >> 30278106

Magnetic compression anastomosis for biliojejunostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy in Whipple's procedure: An initial clinical study.

Xue-Min Liu1,2, Yu Li1,2, Jun-Xi Xiang1,2, Feng Ma1,2, Qiang Lu1,2, Yan-Guang Guo1,2, Xiao-Peng Yan1,2, Bo Wang1,2, Xu-Feng Zhang1,2, Yi Lv1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Magnetic anastomosis has been attempted in biliary and intestinal reconstruction. The objective of the current study was to introduce an initial clinical use of magnetic compression anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy and biliojejunostomy in Whipple's procedure.
METHODS: Patients with peri-ampullary carcinoma and dilated bile and pancreatic ducts were prospectively enrolled from 2016 to 2017. After pancreaticoduodenectomy, an appropriate mother magnet and drainage tube was placed in the proximal bile duct and pancreatic duct. The daughter magnets were introduced to mate with the mother magnets at the anastomotic sites. A close postoperative surveillance and routine cholangiopancreaticography via the drainage tube were performed.
RESULTS: One female and three male patients with a median age of 69 years (range, 57-77) were included. The diameter of the common bile ducts and pancreatic ducts ranged from 8 to 15 mm, and 7 to 10 mm, respectively. The median time duration for biliojejunostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy was 7 (range, 5-8 min) min and 9 (range, 8-10 min) min, respectively. The median time of biliojejunostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy formation was 17 (range, 15-21 days) days and 11 (range, 10-18 days), respectively. With a median follow up of 313 days, one patient developed biliary anastomotic stricture at 11 months after surgery, and underwent stent placement via percutaneous transhepatic drainage sinus, and recovered well.
CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic anastomosis is safe, effective, and simple for both biliojejunostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy in Whipple's procedure.
© 2018 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biliojejunostomy; magnetic anastomosis; morbidity; pancreaticojejunostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30278106     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  5 in total

1.  Magnetic compression anastomosis for the treatment of benign biliary strictures: a clinical study from China.

Authors:  Yu Li; Hao Sun; Xiaopeng Yan; Shanpei Wang; Dinghui Dong; Xuemin Liu; Bo Wang; Maosheng Su; Yi Lv
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Fedora-type magnetic compression anastomosis device for intestinal anastomosis.

Authors:  Huan Chen; Tao Ma; Yue Wang; Hao-Yang Zhu; Zhe Feng; Rong-Qian Wu; Yi Lv; Ding-Hui Dong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Establishment of Yan-Zhang's staging of digestive tract magnetic compression anastomosis in a rat model.

Authors:  Miaomiao Zhang; Xin Lyu; Guangbin Zhao; Yingfeng An; Yi Lyu; Xiaopeng Yan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Esophageal magnetic compression anastomosis in dogs.

Authors:  Xiang-Hua Xu; Yi Lv; Shi-Qi Liu; Xiao-Hai Cui; Rui-Yang Suo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.374

5.  Magnetic compression anastomosis for rectal atresia following necrotizing enterocolitis: A case report.

Authors:  Shi-Qi Liu; Qi-Feng Li; Yi Lv; Jing-Ru Zhao; Rui-Xue Luo; Peng-Fei Zhang; Jin-Zhen Guo; An-Peng Zhang; Qing-Hong Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.