Literature DB >> 30277998

Osteosynthesis with Parallel Implants in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: Minimal Effect of Implant Position on Risk of Reoperation.

Anne Marie Nyholm1, Henrik Palm1, Håkon Sandholdt1, Anders Troelsen1, Kirill Gromov1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence of reoperation and the effect of implant position on the risk of reoperation within 12 months following osteosynthesis with use of parallel implants for femoral neck fractures.
METHODS: From cases registered in the Danish Fracture Database, 1,206 consecutive surgeries for a primary femoral neck fracture treated with use of parallel implants during the period of December 2011 to November 2015, and having available radiographs and follow-up data, were reviewed. Data included age, sex, time to surgery, fracture classification, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Fracture displacement, posterior tilt, the number of implants, posterior distance, calcar distance, tip-cartilage distance, and angulation of implants were measured on pre- and postoperative radiographs. Data on secondary surgeries were collected from the Danish Civil Registration System. The effects of the included variables on the risk of reoperation were evaluated using Cox regression analysis.
RESULTS: The median age was 73 years (range, 21 to 102 years); in 69% of the cases, the patient was female. Two implants were used in 997 cases and 3 implants were used in 209. In 157 cases, the patient underwent reoperation within 1 year; in 228 cases, the patient died within 1 year. The median time to reoperation was 116 days. Patients <70 years of age were more likely to undergo reoperation (18.0% compared with 9.8%) but less likely to die (7.4% compared with 26.3%) than were patients ≥70 years of age. Female sex, higher ASA score, and displaced fractures were associated with increased risk of reoperation. Time to surgery was associated with increased risk of reoperation for displaced fractures only. Of the variables pertaining to the osteosynthesis, only insufficient fracture reduction, placement of the implants with an angle to the shaft of ≤125°, and femoral head perforation significantly increased the risk of reoperation. We found no effect of the posterior distance, the calcar distance, the tip-caput distance, or whether or not the implants were parallel.
CONCLUSIONS: Insufficient reduction, varus position of the implants, and perforation of the femoral head cartilage were the only surgical factors influencing the risk of reoperation. Sufficient fracture reduction is perhaps more important than focusing on an optimal position of the implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30277998     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  8 in total

1.  Rate of conversion to secondary arthroplasty after femoral neck fractures in 796 younger patients treated with internal fixation: a Swedish national register-based study.

Authors:  Sebastian Strøm Rönnquist; Johan Lagergren; Bjarke Viberg; Michael Möller; Cecilia Rogmark
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.925

2.  Posterior and anterior tilt increases the risk of failure after internal fixation of Garden I and II femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Pontus Sjöholm; Volker Otten; Olof Wolf; Max Gordon; Gustav Karsten; Olof Sköldenberg; Sebastian Mukka
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Preoperative Anterior and Posterior Tilt of Garden I-II Femoral Neck Fractures Predict Treatment Failure and Need for Reoperation in Patients Over 60 Years.

Authors:  Pontus Sjöholm; Jonas Sundkvist; Olof Wolf; Olof Sköldenberg; Max Gordon; Sebastian Mukka
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-10-28

4.  Clinical outcomes of patients with Garden I and II femoral neck fractures as verified on MRI: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Jonas Sundkvist; Pontus Sjöholm; Ana Pejic; Olof Wolf; Olof Sköldenberg; Cecilia Rogmark; Sebastian Mukka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  A Comparative Analysis of Femoral Neck System and Three Cannulated Screws Fixation in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Six-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Ya-Zhong Zhang; Yan Lin; Chao Li; Xi-Jun Yue; Gao-Yu Li; Bin Wang; Yun-Qing Wang; Zi-Qiang Zhu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Association between Weitbrecht's Retinaculum Injury and Femoral Head Necrosis in Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Jiong Mei; Shuqing Wang; Ming Ni; Fangfang Zhang; Jianfei Tang; Gang Bi; Yi Zhu; Xiaozhong Zhu; Ye Lu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  A Simple Percutaneous Technique to Reduce Valgus-Impacted Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Byung-Ho Yoon; Yoon Seok Kim; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-14

8.  Drill holes decrease cancellous bone strength: A comparative study of 33 paired osteoporotic human and 9 paired artificial bone samples.

Authors:  Marcin Ceynowa; Krzysztof Zerdzicki; Pawel Klosowski; Rafal Pankowski; Marek Roclawski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.