Dan J Vick1, Asa B Wilson2, Michael Fisher3, Carrie Roseamelia4. 1. 1Medical Affairs Department, St. Vincent Evansville, Evansville, Indiana (formerly with Oneida Healthcare, Oneida, NY). 2. 2School of Health Sciences, Methodist University, Fayetteville, North Carolina. 3. 3Rueckert-Hartman College for Health Professions,Regis University,Denver,Colorado. 4. 4Rural Medical Scholars ProgramSUNY Upstate Medical University,Syracuse,New York.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The intent of this study was to determine whether there are differences in disaster preparedness between urban and rural community hospitals across New York State. METHODS: Descriptive and analytical cross-sectional survey study of 207 community hospitals; thirty-five questions evaluated 6 disaster preparedness elements: disaster plan development, on-site surge capacity, available materials and resources, disaster education and training, disaster preparedness funding levels, and perception of disaster preparedness. RESULTS: Completed surveys were received from 48 urban hospitals and 32 rural hospitals.There were differences in disaster preparedness between urban and rural hospitals with respect to disaster plan development, on-site surge capacity, available materials and resources, disaster education and training, and perception of disaster preparedness. No difference was identified between these hospitals with respect to disaster preparedness funding levels. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide an assessment of the current state of disaster preparedness in urban and rural community hospitals in New York. Differences in preparedness between the two settings may reflect differing priorities with respect to perceived threats, as well as opportunities for improvement that may require additional advocacy and legislation. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:424-428).
OBJECTIVE: The intent of this study was to determine whether there are differences in disaster preparedness between urban and rural community hospitals across New York State. METHODS: Descriptive and analytical cross-sectional survey study of 207 community hospitals; thirty-five questions evaluated 6 disaster preparedness elements: disaster plan development, on-site surge capacity, available materials and resources, disaster education and training, disaster preparedness funding levels, and perception of disaster preparedness. RESULTS: Completed surveys were received from 48 urban hospitals and 32 rural hospitals.There were differences in disaster preparedness between urban and rural hospitals with respect to disaster plan development, on-site surge capacity, available materials and resources, disaster education and training, and perception of disaster preparedness. No difference was identified between these hospitals with respect to disaster preparedness funding levels. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provide an assessment of the current state of disaster preparedness in urban and rural community hospitals in New York. Differences in preparedness between the two settings may reflect differing priorities with respect to perceived threats, as well as opportunities for improvement that may require additional advocacy and legislation. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:424-428).
Keywords:
New York; community hospital; disaster preparedness; rural; urban