Literature DB >> 30276798

Renal cell carcinoma and pathologic nodal disease: Implications for American Joint Committee on Cancer staging.

Kai-Jie Yu1,2, Sarp K Keskin1, Matthew A Meissner1, Firas G Petros1, Xuemei Wang3, Leonardo D Borregales1, Cindy Gu1, Pheroze Tamboli4, Surena F Matin1, Christopher G Wood1, Jose A Karam1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) metastases are associated with poor outcomes for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). This study compared the survival outcomes of patients with stage III, node-positive disease (pT123 N1 M0 ) and patients with stage III, node-negative disease (pT3 N0 M0 ).
METHODS: A database of 4652 patients with RCC of any histological subtype treated with surgery at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1993 to 2012 was retrospectively assessed. A total of 115 patients with pT123 N1 M0 disease, 274 patients with pT3 N0 M0 disease, and 523 patients with pT123 N0/x M1 disease were included. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated and compared between each cohort.
RESULTS: Median OS and CSS times were significantly better for pT3 N0 M0 patients than pT123 N1 M0 patients (OS, 10.2 vs 2.4 years, P < .0001; CSS, not reached vs 2.8 years, P < .0001). Similar median OS and CSS times were noted for pT123 N1 M0 and pT123 N0/x M1 patients (OS, 2.4 vs 2.4 years; P = .62; CSS, 2.8 vs 2.4 years; P = .10). In a multivariate analysis, tumor grade (hazard ratio [HR] for OS, 2.47; P < .0001; HR for CSS, 2.99; P < .0001) and pathologic LN involvement (HR for OS, 2.44; P < .0001; HR for CSS, 2.85; P < .0001) were associated with worse OS and CSS.
CONCLUSIONS: Among RCC patients classified with stage III disease, those with pT123 N1 M0 disease had significantly worse survival than those with pT3 N0 M0 disease. OS and CSS were similar for patients with pT123 N1 M0 disease and patients with pT123 N0/x M1 disease (stage IV). If validated, these findings suggest that RCC patients with nodal disease should be reclassified as having stage IV disease.
© 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kidney cancer; locally advanced renal cell carcinoma; lymph node dissection; nephrectomy; staging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30276798     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  8 in total

1.  Is nodal disease burden relevant in patients with renal cell carcinoma and lymph node invasion?

Authors:  Francisco Rodriguez-Covarrubias
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

2.  Accuracy of clinical nodal staging and factors associated with receipt of lymph node dissection at the time of surgery for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Kushan D Radadia; Zorimar Rivera-Núñez; Sinae Kim; Nicholas J Farber; Joshua Sterling; Marissa Falkiewicz; Parth K Modi; Sharad Goyal; Rahul Parikh; Robert E Weiss; Isaac Y Kim; Sammy E Elsamra; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  The Role of Lymph Node Dissection for Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xu Shi; Dechao Feng; Dengxiong Li; Facai Zhang; Wuran Wei
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Dissecting the role of lymphadenectomy in the management of renal cell carcinoma: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Alain Kaldany; Zev R Leopold; Juliana E Kim; Hiren V Patel; Arnav Srivastava; Alexandra L Tabakin; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Kidney Cancer J       Date:  2020-12

5.  Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma: A study based on SEER database.

Authors:  Guangyi Huang; Jie Liao; Songwang Cai; Zheng Chen; Xiaoping Qin; Longhong Ba; Jingmin Rao; Weimin Zhong; Ying Lin; Yuying Liang; Liwei Wei; Jinhua Li; Kaifeng Deng; Xiangyue Li; Zexiong Guo; Liang Wang; Yumin Zhuo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  A 25 year perspective on the evolution and advances in an understanding of the biology, evaluation and treatment of kidney cancer.

Authors:  Daniel M Geynisman; Jodi K Maranchie; Mark W Ball; Gennady Bratslavsky; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.954

7.  Reassessment of American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Stage III Renal Cell Carcinoma With Nodal Involvement: Propensity Score Matched Analyses of a Large Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Jianglong Han; Qin Li; Ping Li; Shijie Wang; Rui Zhang; Yunfeng Qiao; Qibin Song; Zhenming Fu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Organotypic primary blood vessel models of clear cell renal cell carcinoma for single-patient clinical trials.

Authors:  María Virumbrales-Muñoz; Jiong Chen; Jose Ayuso; Moonhee Lee; E Jason Abel; David J Beebe
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 7.517

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.