The development of next-generation materials is coupled with the ability to predictably and precisely synthesize polymers with well-defined structures and architectures. In this regard, the discovery of synthetic strategies that allow on demand control over monomer connectivity during polymerization would provide access to complex structures in a modular fashion and remains a grand challenge in polymer chemistry. In this Article, we report a method where monomer selectivity is controlled during the polymerization by the application of two orthogonal stimuli. Specifically, we developed a cationic polymerization where polymer chain growth is controlled by a chemical stimulus and paired it with a compatible photocontrolled radical polymerization. By alternating the application of the chemical and photochemical stimuli the incorporation of vinyl ethers and acrylates could be dictated by switching between cationic and radical polymerization mechanisms, respectively. This enables the synthesis of multiblock copolymers where each block length is governed by the amount of time a stimulus is applied, and the quantity of blocks is determined by the number of times the two stimuli are toggled. This new method allows on demand control over polymer structure with external influences and highlights the potential for using stimuli-controlled polymerizations to access novel materials.
The development of next-generation materials is coupled with the ability to predictably and precisely synthesize polymers with well-defined structures and architectures. In this regard, the discovery of synthetic strategies that allow on demand control over monomer connectivity during polymerization would provide access to complex structures in a modular fashion and remains a grand challenge in polymer chemistry. In this Article, we report a method where monomer selectivity is controlled during the polymerization by the application of two orthogonal stimuli. Specifically, we developed a cationic polymerization where polymer chain growth is controlled by a chemical stimulus and paired it with a compatible photocontrolled radical polymerization. By alternating the application of the chemical and photochemical stimuli the incorporation of vinyl ethers and acrylates could be dictated by switching between cationic and radical polymerization mechanisms, respectively. This enables the synthesis of multiblock copolymers where each block length is governed by the amount of time a stimulus is applied, and the quantity of blocks is determined by the number of times the two stimuli are toggled. This new method allows on demand control over polymer structure with external influences and highlights the potential for using stimuli-controlled polymerizations to access novel materials.
Macromolecular properties are inherently
influenced by polymer
molar mass, monomer sequence, and architecture, as made evident by
the diversity of functions observed among bio-macromolecules derived
from a limited library of molecular building blocks. Therefore, the
discovery of synthetic techniques that give increased control over
monomer connectivity and structure in a polymer will broaden the range
of applications of these materials. Chemists have made significant
progress in making well-defined materials with the development of
“living” polymerizations that enable the formation of
macromolecules with predictable molar masses (Mn) and narrow molar mass distributions (dispersity, Đ) with high chain-end fidelity capable of postpolymerization
modification.[1,2] Even greater control over polymerization
processes has recently been achieved through regulation of chain growth
with various external stimuli[3,4] (i.e., thermal,[5−7] chemical,[8−13] mechanochemical,[14−17] electrochemical,[18,19] and photochemical[20−45]). However, the ability to precisely control monomer connectivity
during a polymerization remains a grand challenge.Temporal
control of polymer chain growth in externally regulated
polymerizations provides an excellent opportunity to precisely control
macromolecular structure and function. To exploit this unique level
of control, we envisioned a system where monomer selectivity at a
given polymer chain-end could be switched on demand with two different
stimuli.[46,47] This strategy would enable the one-pot synthesis
of polymers where the monomer connectivity would be precisely dictated
by external influences and would be a step closer to nature’s
ability to perfectly control polymer sequence.To achieve this
goal, we were inspired by systems developed by
Kamigaito and co-workers where both radical and cationic polymerization
processes are active in a single reaction, allowing blocks of two
monomers that react via different mechanisms to be randomly incorporated
into the same polymer chain.[48−52] We reasoned that temporal control over the cationic and radical
mechanisms via two stimuli would allow on demand switching of polymerization
mechanism in situ and lead to precise control over
the block structure of the final polymer.Taking a step toward
this challenge, our group recently developed
a two-photocatalyst system that took advantage of photocontrolled
cationic and radical reversible addition–fragmentation chain
transfer (RAFT) polymerizations (Figure a).[53,54] Irradiating our system
with green light led to promotion of the cationic polymerization of
isobutyl vinyl ether (IBVE) through selective excitation of an oxidizing
photocatalyst.[55,56] Alternatively, irradiation with
blue light excited both the reducing and oxidizing photocatalysts
in solution leading to simultaneous radical polymerization of methyl
acrylate (MA) and cationic polymerization of IBVE (Figure a). Although this two-photocatalyst
system demonstrated that the polymerization mechanism could be changed in situ, selective promotion of the radical mechanism was
not possible due to the overlap of the absorption spectra of the two
catalysts. In order to overcome this limitation, polymerization processes
where chain growth is regulated by two orthogonal and compatible stimuli
are necessary to allow selective promotion of either the radical or
cationic pathways (Figure b).
Figure 1
(a) Interconversion of polymerization mechanisms via nonorthogonal
photoirradiation of two photocatalysts with blue and green light.
(b) Generation of cations and radicals at polymer chain-ends via two
orthogonal stimuli. (c) Synthesis of tetrablock vinyl ether-b-methyl acrylate copolymers via a chemical–photochemical
gated mechanistic switch.
(a) Interconversion of polymerization mechanisms via nonorthogonal
photoirradiation of two photocatalysts with blue and green light.
(b) Generation of cations and radicals at polymer chain-ends via two
orthogonal stimuli. (c) Synthesis of tetrablock vinyl ether-b-methyl acrylate copolymers via a chemical–photochemical
gated mechanistic switch.Herein, we report the development of a new chemically controlled
cationic polymerization of vinyl ether monomers. Combining this cationic
polymerization with a photocontrolled radical process enables completely
orthogonal switching of polymerization mechanism at a single chain-end in situ. This increased level of control is successfully
applied to the one-pot synthesis of multiblock copolymers of IBVE
and MA, without the need for subsequent polymer isolation, purification,
or chain-end modification (Figure c).
Results and Discussion
To gain precise
control over polymerization mechanism in
situ, we set out to develop a cationic polymerization regulated
by a stimulus orthogonal and compatible with the photocontrolled radical
polymerization process. In recent years, chemists have investigated
a number of stimuli compatible with light to induce polymerization,
including mechanical force, electricity, redox events triggered by
chemical additives, and temperature. Among those, we opted for a chemical
stimulus that could be used to initiate and reversibly terminate the
propagating cation. We hypothesized that the cationic polymerization
could be initiated with a mild single electron oxidant (Figure a).
Figure 2
Proposed mechanism including
(a) initiation, (b) reversible addition–fragmentation
chain transfer (RAFT) equilibrium, and (c) termination of the chemically
(red flask) gated cationic polymerization of vinyl ether monomers
(M = monomer).
Proposed mechanism including
(a) initiation, (b) reversible addition–fragmentation
chain transfer (RAFT) equilibrium, and (c) termination of the chemically
(red flask) gated cationic polymerization of vinyl ether monomers
(M = monomer).Specifically, we reasoned
that the addition of ferrocenium salts
(FcX) should selectively oxidize the chain transfer agents (CTA) 1a or 1b and, consequently, shuttle a predictable
amount of an oxocarbenium ion into the RAFT mechanism (Figure b).[57] Importantly, temporal control over chain growth could be achieved
through the addition of a dithiocarbamate anion, 2, to
recap propagating cations as well as reduce any remaining ferrocenium
to ferrocene, completely halting the polymerization (Figure c). This process would provide
a cationic polymerization that could be reversibly activated/deactivated
through the addition of two chemical species. Moreover, the rate of
polymerization could be dictated by the concentration of FcX added.To test our hypothesis, we examined the use of ferrocenium tetrafluoroborate
(FcBF4) to initiate the cationic polymerization of vinyl
ethers. Treating a solution of IBVE and 1a with FcBF4 in dichloromethane (DCM) gave a 10.3 kg/mol polymer with
a narrow Đ of 1.11 (Table , entry 1). Importantly, the experimental
molar mass aligned well with the theoretical value, demonstrating
that this system has excellent initiator efficiency. Control experiments
demonstrated that performing the reaction in the absence of FcBF4 gave no polymerization (Table , entry 2), while removal of 1a gave a
broad dispersity, high molecular weight polymer (Table , entry 3). At higher loadings
of FcBF4 (5 mol % relative to IBVE), experimental Mn’s deviated from theoretical values
(Table , entry 4),
through promotion of uncontrolled polymerization pathways like those
observed in the absence of 1a. Additionally, at very
low concentrations of FcBF4 (0.0025 mol %), no conversion
of monomer is observed (Table , entry 5), unless the more active CTA 1b is
used (Table , entry
6).
Table 1
Optimization of the Cationic Polymerization
of IBVE Using FcBF4
entrya
[IBVE]:[CTA]:[Fc+]
conversion
(%)
Mn,theob (kg/mol)
Mn,expc (kg/mol)
Đ
1
100:1:0.01
>99
10.2
10.3
1.11
2
100:1:0
0
0
0
0
3
100:0:0.01
89
243
2.35
4
100:1:5.0
>99
10.2
14.7
1.14
5
100:1:0.0025
0
0
0
0
6d
100:1:0.0025
>99
10.2
11.1
1.45
7
100:1:1.0
>99
10.2
10.6
1.10
8
200:1:0.01
>99
20.2
19.0
1.11
9
400:1:0.02
>99
40.2
35.1
1.16
10
600:1:0.04
>99
60.5
54.6
1.28
11
800:1:0.04
>99
80.5
65.3
1.24
12e
100:1:0.01
>99
10.2
10.1
1.25
[IBVE] = 3.1 M (in DCM); reaction
volume = 0.65 mL.
Mn,exp determined by gel
permeation chromatography with a multiangle light
scattering detector.
CTA
= 1b.
Open
to air.
[IBVE] = 3.1 M (in DCM); reaction
volume = 0.65 mL.Mn,theo = [M]/[CTA] × MWmonomer × conversion + MWCTA.Mn,exp determined by gel
permeation chromatography with a multiangle light
scattering detector.CTA
= 1b.Open
to air.Interestingly, initiating
the polymerization with FcBF4 proved to be effective at
synthesizing high molecular weight poly(IBVE)
up to 65 kg/mol with narrow Đ values (Table , entries 7–11).
This is a significant advantage over our previously reported photocontrolled
cationic polymerizations where we observed a loss in control when
targeting molar masses above 20 kg/mol. We attribute this increased
efficiency to the lower oxidation potential of ferrocene (Fc) relative
to 1a, creating milder polymerization conditions that
limit the generation of new chains via direct oxidation of IBVE, a
previously observed undesired pathway.[55] Under the reported reaction conditions, high degrees of polymerization
were achieved within 3 h. Additionally, these conditions provide a
polymerization robust enough to proceed under ambient atmosphere while
maintaining low Đ and excellent control over
the final polymer Mn (Table , entry 12).[58] This result demonstrates the practicality of the polymerization
and avoids the requirement of advanced air and water free techniques.Importantly, the new FcBF4-initiated process delivered
effective cationic polymerization of a range of vinyl ether monomers
that had varied steric and electronic characteristics, along with para-methoxystyrene. In each case, excellent agreement between
theoretical and experimental Mn’s
was observed while maintaining narrow Đ values
(Figure ).
Figure 3
Substrate scope
of vinyl monomers that can be polymerized via ferrocenium-mediated
cationic RAFT polymerization.
Substrate scope
of vinyl monomers that can be polymerized via ferrocenium-mediated
cationic RAFT polymerization.To grow multiblock copolymers employing this method excellent
chain-end
fidelity is essential. To demonstrate that active chain-ends are maintained
in these polymerizations, we synthesized a poly(IBVE) macroinitiator
under our standard conditions and then chain-extended it with ethyl
vinyl ether (EVE) to give a well-defined poly(IBVE-b-EVE) diblock copolymer (see the Supporting Information, Figures S7–S9). Importantly, we observed
a clear shift in the size exclusion chromatography trace to higher
molar mass with no tailing, demonstrating that the dithiocarbamate
chain-ends are intact after the polymerization.Thus far, we
have shown that ferrocenium is an effective mediator
of the cationic polymerization vinyl ethers. However, the ability
to temporally control chain growth on demand is required to pair this
system with a photocontrolled radical polymerization and enable switching
of polymerization mechanism. We hypothesized that the chemically controlled
polymerization could be reversibly terminated through the addition
of 1 equiv of the dithiocarbamate anion 2 relative to
the amount of FcBF4 added to initiate polymerization (Figure c). Theoretically,
the anion should cap propagating cations to generate a dormant chain-end,
while reducing unreacted Fc+ to Fc, preventing the generation
of new propagating cations. To test this hypothesis, polymerization
of IBVE was initiated through the addition of FcBF4 under
our standard conditions (Figure ). After 25 min, 2 was added, and conversion
of the monomer immediately halted. Importantly, the subsequent addition
of FcBF4 once again initiated the cationic polymerization.
This process was repeated multiple times, demonstrating excellent
temporal control over the polymerization with a chemical stimulus.
Figure 4
Temporal
control over polymer initiation and reversible termination
via the addition of FcBF4 and 2, respectively.
Temporal
control over polymer initiation and reversible termination
via the addition of FcBF4 and 2, respectively.Significantly, our new chemically
regulated cationic polymerization
method is orthogonal to visible light and should be compatible with
the radical photoinduced electron transfer-RAFT (PET-RAFT) polymerizations
employing Ir(ppy)3 as the photocatalyst. Therefore, combining
these two polymerizations in one pot should enable switching of polymerization
mechanisms through modulation of the two stimuli, although consideration
must be given to the mechanism of switching. We have previously demonstrated
efficient initiation of the radical polymerization of MA from a poly(IBVE)
macroinitiator due to the favorable formation of an α–oxy
radical, which will enable efficient chain extension of MA from poly(IBVE).
Conversely, initiation of the polymerization of IBVE from the poly(MA)
chain-end could be problematic because it requires the formation of
a high energy α–acyl cation. However, we proposed that
we could circumvent this issue by taking advantage of the small amounts
of incorporation of IBVE during the radical copolymerization with
MA. As previously shown by Kamigaito, the majority of dormant chain-ends
are thioacetals derived from vinyl ether monomers due to the radical
RAFT fragmentation kinetics.[59] These thioacetals
are effective at generating a cation and can promote vinyl ether homopolymerization.Indeed, when exposing 1b, equimolar amounts of MA
and IBVE, and 0.02 mol % Ir(ppy)3 to blue light, poly(MA)
is synthesized with 20–30% incorporation of IBVE (Figure a). Chain-end analysis
by 1H NMR of the final polymer revealed the presence of
greater than 90% thioacetal chain-ends (Figure b). Gratifyingly, upon removal of blue light
irradiation and addition of FcBF4 to the crude reaction
mixture, the polymer was successfully chain-extended via cationic
polymerization to give a well-defined poly(MA-b-IBVE)
block polymer (Figure a). This result demonstrates successful switching from radical to
cationic polymerization in situ through modulation
of the external stimuli, which is a key requirement for the controlled
synthesis of multiblock copolymers. This approach represents a significant
advance over our previously reported photocontrolled switching method,
due to the orthogonal stimuli that enable us to selectively invoke
the radical mechanism.
Figure 5
(a) A random copolymer of MA and IBVE can act as a macroinitiator
for poly(MA-b-IBVE). (b) 1H NMR chain-end
analysis of the random copolymer revealed >90% thioacetal chain-ends.
(a) A random copolymer of MA and IBVE can act as a macroinitiator
for poly(MA-b-IBVE). (b) 1H NMR chain-end
analysis of the random copolymer revealed >90% thioacetal chain-ends.With the ability to switch polymerization
mechanism on demand,
we set out to explore the range of copolymer sequences that can be
targeted through modulation of the order of applied stimuli. Figure a shows the monomer
conversion over time for the synthesis of poly(MA-b-IBVE) diblock copolymer, where we first promoted the radical polymerization
with light followed by the chemically controlled cationic polymerization.
This can be extended to triblock copolymers under the same conditions
by adding an additional switching event. After the first mechanistic
switch from radical to cationic polymerization to generate poly(MA-b-IBVE), vinyl ether polymerization can be successfully
halted by the addition of 2. Subsequent re-exposure to
blue light initiates radical polymerization of MA resulting in poly(MA-b-IBVE-b-MA) triblock with predictable
molar mass and narrow dispersity (Figure b).
Figure 6
Conversion of MA (solid line) and IBVE (dashed
line) over time
upon applying chemically controlled cationic and photochemically controlled
radical polymerization. (a) Conversion plot for poly(MA-b-IBVE). (b) Conversion plot for poly(MA-b-IBVE-b-MA). (c) Conversion plot for poly(IBVE-b-MA-b-IBVE). (d) Conversion plot for poly(IBVE-b-MA-b-IBVE-b-MA).
Conversion of MA (solid line) and IBVE (dashed
line) over time
upon applying chemically controlled cationic and photochemically controlled
radical polymerization. (a) Conversion plot for poly(MA-b-IBVE). (b) Conversion plot for poly(MA-b-IBVE-b-MA). (c) Conversion plot for poly(IBVE-b-MA-b-IBVE). (d) Conversion plot for poly(IBVE-b-MA-b-IBVE-b-MA).Interestingly, from the same solution
conditions the inverse triblock
copolymer can be synthesized by simply altering the sequence of the
two applied stimuli. Specifically, initiating polymerization of IBVE,
in the presence of MA and Ir(ppy)3, by treatment with FcBF4 in the absence of blue light (Figure c), we observed solely conversion of IBVE
over the first hour. Addition of 2 resulted in termination
of the cationic polymerization, followed by irradiation with blue
light for 2 h to promote radical polymerization of the acrylate. Turning
the light off and treating the reaction with 0.05 mol % FcBF4 resulted in a clean mechanistic switch from radical polymerization
of MA to the cationic polymerization of vinyl ethers, generating a
well-defined poly(IBVE-b-MA-b-IBVE)
triblock. This can be taken a step further, generating a poly(IBVE-b-MA-b-IBVE-b-MA) tetrablock
copolymer (Figure d) by adding one additional switching event to the last triblock
copolymer. It is worth noting that the length of each block can be
controlled by the length of time the stimulus is applied, and the
number of blocks can be dictated by the number of times the stimuli
are toggled. These data clearly show that pairing orthogonal stimuli
to control polymerization mechanism and monomer selectivity is a powerful
approach toward the synthesis of advanced polymeric structures.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have developed a system that enables switching
of polymerization mechanism and monomer selectivity in situ with two external stimuli. The identification of a cationic polymerization
controlled by a chemical stimulus that was both orthogonal and compatible
with the photocontrolled radical polymerization was key to achieving
efficient switching. We demonstrated that ferrocenium salts were highly
efficient initiators for the cationic RAFT polymerization of vinyl
ethers and showed that reversible termination could be achieved through
the addition of a dithiocarbamate anion. By pairing this new chemically
controlled cationic polymerization with a photocontrolled RAFT polymerization,
we were able to selectively and reversibly promote the polymerization
of vinyl ethers or acrylates. Under identical solution conditions,
this enabled the synthesis of an array of well-defined multiblock
copolymers where the final structure was dictated by the two stimuli;
the length of each block was controlled by the amount of time the
stimulus was applied, and the number of blocks was governed by the
alternating application of the two stimuli. These results demonstrate
the power of combining controlled polymerization processes that are
regulated by different external stimuli and lay the groundwork for
developing systems where polymer sequence, structure, and architecture
are controlled on demand via external influences.
Authors: Charlotte K A Gregson; Ian J Blackmore; Vernon C Gibson; Nicholas J Long; Edward L Marshall; Andrew J P White Journal: Dalton Trans Date: 2006-03-27 Impact factor: 4.390
Authors: Xinke Wang; Arnaud Thevenon; Jonathan L Brosmer; Insun Yu; Saeed I Khan; Parisa Mehrkhodavandi; Paula L Diaconescu Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-07-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jordan C Theriot; Chern-Hooi Lim; Haishen Yang; Matthew D Ryan; Charles B Musgrave; Garret M Miyake Journal: Science Date: 2016-03-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Veronika Kottisch; Jacob O'Leary; Quentin Michaudel; Erin E Stache; Tristan H Lambert; Brett P Fors Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 15.419