Literature DB >> 30276120

Quantitative Monitoring Wound Healing Status Through Three-dimensional Imaging on Mobile Platforms.

Adam Yee1, John Harmon2, Steven Yi3.   

Abstract

There are approximately 6.5 million patients in the U.S. suffering from chronic wounds and approximately 140,000 patients hospitalized every year with new wounds. With a long healing process, this demands the need for a non-contact, low cost, and remote monitoring solution that can assist clinicians in diagnosing and treating a patient's wound. This will reduce the burden of countless office visits, especially for those who are elderly and incapacitated. We present a mobile platform based wound 3D imaging app. The app is the only integrated measurement solution encompassing wound area and volume through low cost yet accurate 3D imaging. Extensive experiments show the app has 1.14% and 4.41% relative errors for wound area and volume measurement respectively, far exceeding currently employed clinic methods. In addition, non-invasive volume measurement methods currently use expensive industrial 3D (>$20K) cameras, but our solution provides cheap and accurate results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D planimetry; 3D imaging; Ruler method; Wound area and volume; Wound assessment; Wound measurement

Year:  2017        PMID: 30276120      PMCID: PMC6161627          DOI: 10.1016/j.jccw.2017.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec        ISSN: 2213-5103


  10 in total

Review 1.  Cutaneous wound healing.

Authors:  A J Singer; R A Clark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Wound measurement: can it help us to monitor progression to healing?

Authors:  M Flanagan
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.072

3.  Digital planimetry results in more accurate wound measurements: a comparison to standard ruler measurements.

Authors:  Lee C Rogers; Nicholas J Bevilacqua; David G Armstrong; George Andros
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01

4.  Stereophotogrammetry for measuring rates of cutaneous healing: a comparison with conventional techniques.

Authors:  C J Bulstrode; A W Goode; P J Scott
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.124

5.  Methods for assessing change in pressure ulcer status.

Authors:  G T Rodeheaver; N A Stotts
Journal:  Adv Wound Care       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Wound Measurement Techniques: Comparing the Use of Ruler Method, 2D Imaging and 3D Scanner.

Authors:  Aj Shah; C Wollak; J B Shah
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2015-02-27

7.  Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy.

Authors:  Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.617

8.  Platelet gel for healing cutaneous chronic wounds.

Authors:  Giovanni Crovetti; Giovanna Martinelli; Marwan Issi; Marilde Barone; Marco Guizzardi; Barbara Campanati; Marco Moroni; Angelo Carabelli
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.764

9.  Photographing pressure ulcers to enhance documentation.

Authors:  D T Louis
Journal:  Decubitus       Date:  1992-07

10.  A comparison of wound area measurement techniques: visitrak versus photography.

Authors:  Angela Christine Chang; Bronwyn Dearman; John Edward Greenwood
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-04-18
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Reliability of a Three-Dimensional Wound Camera and Correlation With Routine Ruler Measurement in Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.

Authors:  Joel Willem Johan Lasschuit; Jill Featherston; Katherine Thuy Trang Tonks
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-26

2.  Interference of Lactobacillus casei with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the treatment of infected burns in Wistar rats.

Authors:  Mohammad Abootaleb; Narjes Mohammadi Bandari; Nazila Arbab Soleimani
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.699

3.  Infection Probability Index: Implementation of an Automated Chronic Wound Infection Marker.

Authors:  Franziska Schollemann; Janosch Kunczik; Henriette Dohmeier; Carina Barbosa Pereira; Andreas Follmann; Michael Czaplik
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Smart 3D Printed Hydrogel Skin Wound Bandages: A Review.

Authors:  Filmon Tsegay; Mohamed Elsherif; Haider Butt
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.329

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.