Literature DB >> 30276102

Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in Ireland: Are Surgeons Overlooked?

Paula M McQuail1, Ben S McCartney2, Joseph F Baker1, Mutaz Jaadan1, John P McCabe1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) provide a framework of evidence-based guidelines for the management of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). We aimed to compare our center's provision of service to these best practice guidelines and discuss key shortcomings with their implications for the spinal surgeon.
METHODS: Patients with radiologic evidence of MSCC over a 30-month period were identified using the hospital electronic radiological database. A chart review was performed analyzing MSCC management.
RESULTS: Forty-one patients were identified. Pain was the most common presenting complaint, occurring in 76% of patients. Radiotherapy alone was the most common therapy employed (93% of patients). A surgical opinion was sought for 51% of patients. Histological diagnosis of the causative lesion occurred in 5 patients from surgical specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: Incongruities between NICE guidelines and our practice exist. Early involvement of the spinal surgical services needs to be encouraged. Establishing a histological diagnosis of the spinal lesion should be seen as of therapeutic importance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axial metastases; cancer; metastatic spinal cord compression; radiotherapy; surgery

Year:  2018        PMID: 30276102      PMCID: PMC6159712          DOI: 10.14444/5051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  23 in total

Review 1.  Spinal instability secondary to metastatic cancer.

Authors:  C S Galasko; H E Norris; S Crank
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Extradural spinal cord compression: analysis of factors determining functional prognosis--prospective study.

Authors:  R Y Kim; S A Spencer; R F Meredith; B Weppelmann; J Y Lee; J W Smith; M M Salter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  An audit of current practice and management of metastatic spinal cord compression at a regional cancer centre.

Authors:  J Sui; J S Fleming; M Kehoe
Journal:  Ir Med J       Date:  2011-04

4.  Imaging the spine for tumour and trauma--a national audit of practice in Irish hospitals.

Authors:  J C Kelly; D E O'Briain; G A Kelly; J P Mc Cabe
Journal:  Surgeon       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.392

Review 5.  Systematic review of the diagnosis and management of malignant extradural spinal cord compression: the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative's Neuro-Oncology Disease Site Group.

Authors:  D Andrew Loblaw; James Perry; Alexandra Chambers; Normand J Laperriere
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-03-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Spinal radiation before surgical decompression adversely affects outcomes of surgery for symptomatic metastatic spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Z Ghogawala; F L Mansfield; L F Borges
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Assessment and treatment of patients with malignant spinal cord compression.

Authors:  Janet L Abrahm
Journal:  J Support Oncol       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

8.  Epidural spinal cord compression from metastatic tumor: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  R W Gilbert; J H Kim; J B Posner
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Surgical treatment of spinal cord compression from epidural metastasis.

Authors:  N Sundaresan; V P Sachdev; J F Holland; F Moore; M Sung; P A Paciucci; L T Wu; K Kelligher; L Hough
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Surgery for solitary metastases of the spine: rationale and results of treatment.

Authors:  Narayan Sundaresan; Allen Rothman; Karen Manhart; Kevin Kelliher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.