Literature DB >> 30276020

ISOKINETIC MUSCLE PERFORMANCE AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY.

Alexandre R M Pelegrinelli1, Leandro C Guenka1, Josilainne M Dias1, Lais F Dela Bela1, Mariana F Silva1, Felipe A Moura1, Lee E Brown2, Jefferson R Cardoso1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: and Purpose: Knee muscle strength deficits have been reported in individuals who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Isokinetic testing is a valid way to assess muscle strength. Some isokinetic variables, including the range of motion in the phases to attain a specific velocity, load range (sustained specific velocity), time to achieve deceleration, and qualitative analysis of the torque-angle velocity relationship, may contribute to understanding recovery of these individuals after surgery. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the load range (LR), time to attain velocity (TTAV), deceleration time (DT) phases, total range of motion (ROM), peak torque/body mass (PT/BM), angle of peak torque (AngPT) during LR and torque-angle-velocity relationships (TAV3D) between post ACLR and matched control subjects.Study design: Case-control.
METHODS: Seven men who underwent ACLR and seven matched controls were evaluated from four to six months after surgery. Testing was performed on a Biodex System 4 isokinetic dynamometer in concentric mode at 60, 120 and 300 °/s, for knee flexion and extension.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were seen for extension ROM at 60 °/s where ROM was greater in the control group. PT/BM for extensors was also significantly greater in controls by 20 % compared to ACLR at 60 and 120 °/s. PT/BM for flexors was significantly greater for controls at 60 °/s (∼15 %). TAV3D showed differences in torque and, specifically, the control group sustained knee flexion torque for a greater range of motion when compared to the ACLR group.
CONCLUSION: The ACL group presented with lower ROM and PT/BM, therefore exhibiting worse muscle performance in comparison to the control group.Level of Evidence: 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; isokinetic dynamometer; torque.

Year:  2018        PMID: 30276020      PMCID: PMC6159501     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  33 in total

1.  Changes in muscle torque following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between hamstrings and patella tendon graft procedures on 45 patients.

Authors:  Jayne L Anderson; Sallie E Lamb; Karen L Barker; Stephanie Davies; Christopher A Dodd; David J Beard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-10

2.  The influence of velocity overshoot movement artifact on isokinetic knee extension tests.

Authors:  Fabiano Peruzzo Schwartz; Martim Bottaro; Rodrigo Souza Celes; Lee E Brown; Francisco Assis de Oliveira Nascimento
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Isokinetic knee extensor strength and functional performance in healthy female soccer players.

Authors:  A Ostenberg; E Roos; C Ekdahl; H Roos
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 4.  Review of evolution of tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Faizal Rayan; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Darryl Ramoutar; Sujith Konan; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-03-18

Review 5.  Return to play following ACL reconstruction: a systematic review about strength deficits.

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Pouria Taheri; Phillip Forkel; Thore Zantop
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Torque-angle-velocity Relationships and Muscle Performance of Professional and Youth Soccer Players.

Authors:  B F Mazuquin; L F Dela Bela; A R M Pelegrinelli; J M Dias; R L Carregaro; F A Moura; J Selfe; J Richards; L E Brown; J R Cardoso
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 7.  Isokinetic evaluation of muscular performance: implications for muscle testing and rehabilitation.

Authors:  P Kannus
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Loss of extension following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of incidence and etiology using IKDC criteria.

Authors:  Craig S Mauro; James J Irrgang; Brian A Williams; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Isokinetic dynamometer evaluation of the effects of early thigh diameter difference on thigh muscle strength in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon graft.

Authors:  Bekir Eray Kılınç; Adnan Kara; Savas Camur; Yunus Oc; Haluk Celik
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2015-04-30

Review 10.  Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Abrams; Joshua D Harris; Anil K Gupta; Frank M McCormick; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2014-01-21
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Quadriceps Strength After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Compared With Uninjured Matched Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Conlan Brown; Lee Marinko; Michael P LaValley; Deepak Kumar
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-04-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.