Wiliam Eliassen1, Atle Hole Saeterbakken2, Roland van den Tillaar1. 1. Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Nord University, Levanger, Norway. 2. Department of Teacher Education and Sport, Sogn og Fjordane Univeristy College, Sogndal, Norway.
Abstract
PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Bilateral squats are commonly used in lower body strength training programs, while unilateral squats are mainly used as additional or rehabilitative exercises. Little has been reported regarding the kinetics, kinematics and muscle activation in unilateral squats in comparison to bilateral squats. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare muscle activity, kinetics, and barbell kinematics between unilateral and bilateral squats with the same external load per leg in experienced resistance-trained participants. METHODS: Fourteen resistance-trained males (age 23 ± 4years, body mass 80.5 ± 8.5kg and height 1.81 ± 0.06m) participated. Barbell kinematics and surface electromyography (EMG) activity of eleven muscles were measured during the descending and ascending phase of each repetition of the squat exercises. RESULTS: Total lifting time was longer and average and peak velocity were lower for the bilateral squat (p<0.001). Furthermore, higher muscle activity was found in the three quadriceps muscles, biceps femoris (ascending phase) and the erector spinae (ascending phase) in the bilateral squat, while greater activation for the semitendinosis (descending phase) (p=0.003) was observed for the unilateral squat with foot forwards. In the ascending phase, the prime movers showed increased muscle activity with repetition from repetition 1 to 4 (p≤0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral squats with the same external load per leg produced greater peak vertical ground reaction forces than bilateral squats, as well as higher barbell velocity, which is associated with strength development and rate of force development, respectively. The authors suggest using unilateral rather than bilateral squats for people with low back pain and those enrolled in rehabilitation programs after ACL ruptures, as unilateral squats are performed with small loads (28 vs. 135 kg) but achieve similar magnitude of muscle activity in the hamstring, calf, hip and abdominal muscles and create less load on the spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.
PURPOSE/ BACKGROUND: Bilateral squats are commonly used in lower body strength training programs, while unilateral squats are mainly used as additional or rehabilitative exercises. Little has been reported regarding the kinetics, kinematics and muscle activation in unilateral squats in comparison to bilateral squats. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare muscle activity, kinetics, and barbell kinematics between unilateral and bilateral squats with the same external load per leg in experienced resistance-trained participants. METHODS: Fourteen resistance-trained males (age 23 ± 4years, body mass 80.5 ± 8.5kg and height 1.81 ± 0.06m) participated. Barbell kinematics and surface electromyography (EMG) activity of eleven muscles were measured during the descending and ascending phase of each repetition of the squat exercises. RESULTS: Total lifting time was longer and average and peak velocity were lower for the bilateral squat (p<0.001). Furthermore, higher muscle activity was found in the three quadriceps muscles, biceps femoris (ascending phase) and the erector spinae (ascending phase) in the bilateral squat, while greater activation for the semitendinosis (descending phase) (p=0.003) was observed for the unilateral squat with foot forwards. In the ascending phase, the prime movers showed increased muscle activity with repetition from repetition 1 to 4 (p≤0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral squats with the same external load per leg produced greater peak vertical ground reaction forces than bilateral squats, as well as higher barbell velocity, which is associated with strength development and rate of force development, respectively. The authors suggest using unilateral rather than bilateral squats for people with low back pain and those enrolled in rehabilitation programs after ACL ruptures, as unilateral squats are performed with small loads (28 vs. 135 kg) but achieve similar magnitude of muscle activity in the hamstring, calf, hip and abdominal muscles and create less load on the spine. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b.
Authors: Arni Arnason; Stefan B Sigurdsson; Arni Gudmundsson; Ingar Holme; Lars Engebretsen; Roald Bahr Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Mette Kreutzfeldt Zebis; Jørgen Skotte; Christoffer H Andersen; Peter Mortensen; Højland H Petersen; Tine C Viskaer; Tanja L Jensen; Jesper Bencke; Lars L Andersen Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2012-06-26 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Kevin McCurdy; Erin O'Kelley; Matt Kutz; George Langford; James Ernest; Marcos Torres Journal: J Sport Rehabil Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: V Andersen; M S Fimland; O Brennset; L R Haslestad; M S Lundteigen; K Skalleberg; A H Saeterbakken Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2014-09-25 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: Jason Moran; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Bernard Liew; Helmi Chaabene; David G Behm; Antonio García-Hermoso; Mikel Izquierdo; Urs Granacher Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Magdalena Zawadka; Jakub Smolka; Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska; Edyta Lukasik; Aleksandra Bys; Grzegorz Zielinski; Piotr Gawda Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Michal Kralik; Jan Cvecka; Gabriel Buzgo; Matus Putala; Barbara Ukropcova; Jozef Ukropec; Zdenko Killinger; Juraj Payer; Boris Kollarik; Peter Bujdak; Truls Raastad; Milan Sedliak Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 2.692