Literature DB >> 30275854

Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α Regulates the Transforming Growth Factor β1/SMAD Family Member 3 Pathway to Promote Breast Cancer Progression.

Jianheng Peng1, Xiaolin Wang1, Liang Ran1, Junlong Song2, Rong Luo1, Yonghong Wang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1)/SMAD family member 3 (SMAD3) pathway, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) are two key players in various types of malignancies including breast cancer. The TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway can interact with HIF-1α in some diseases; however, their interaction in breast cancer is still unknown. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the interactions between the TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway and HIF-1α in breast cancer.
METHODS: Expression of HIF-1α in serum of breast cancer patients and healthy controls was detected by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, and the diagnostic value of HIF-1α for breast cancer was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Breast cancer cell lines overexpressing SMAD3 and HIF-1α were established. Cell apoptosis and proliferation following different treatments were detected by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, and cell counting kit-8, respectively. Expression of related proteins was detected by western blot.
RESULTS: Serum levels of HIF-1α were higher in breast cancer patients than in normal controls. Both SMAD3 and HIF-1α overexpression inhibited cell apoptosis and promoted cell proliferation. Treatment with inhibitors of HIF-1α and SMAD3 promoted apoptosis in breast cancer cells and inhibited their proliferation. Overexpression of HIF-1α promoted the expression of TGF-β1 and SMAD3, while SMAD3 overexpression did not significantly affect expression of HIF-1α or TGF-β1.
CONCLUSION: HIF-1α serves as an upstream regulator of the TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway and promotes the growth of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasms; Hypoxia-inducible factor 1; Smad3 protein; Transforming growth factor beta1

Year:  2018        PMID: 30275854      PMCID: PMC6158164          DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2018.21.e42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1738-6756            Impact factor:   3.588


INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer, a malignancy that originates from breast tissue, is the most common type of cancer in females [1]. It is estimated that more than 10% of women will be affected by breast cancer during their lifetime [23]. Due to intrinsic resistance mechanisms, breast cancer is usually quite resistant to currently available antitumor drugs [4], and the development of drug resistance during long-term chemical treatment is a major cause of unsatisfactory treatment outcomes, and poor prognosis, in breast cancer patients [56]. In spite of the efforts that have been made to improve breast cancer treatment, the 5-year survival rate is 27%, if the cancer has spread to other body part [1]. At present, early diagnosis and treatment still play key roles in improving the survival of patients with breast cancer. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) is a subunit of the heterodimeric transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1, which plays pivotal roles in various pathological processes including the development of different types of human malignancies [7]. Because HIF-1α promotes the development of different types of tumors by promoting cancer cell survival and inhibiting cell apoptosis [8], it has become a target for the treatment of a variety of cancer types. The involvement of HIF-1α in breast cancer has been reported by several previous studies [910]. However, HIF-1α signaling transduction and the mechanism of its function have not been fully elucidated. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the involvement of HIF-1α in breast cancer and to explore the molecular mechanism of its action.

METHODS

Patients

A total of 102 patients with breast cancer were selected in the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2011 to January 2012. Their ages ranged from 22 to 71 years with an average age of 46±6.7 years. All patients were diagnosed by pathological and imaging examinations, and primary tumors were divided into four stages, namely T1, T2, T3, and T4. Diagnostic criteria were as follows: greatest dimension of tumor ≤20 mm, T1; greatest dimension of tumor >20 mm, ≤50 mm, T2; greatest dimension of tumor >50 mm, T3; tumor of any size with direct invasion of the skin (ulceration or skin nodules) or chest wall, T4. There were 22 patients in T1, 28 in T2, 26 in T3, and 26 in T4. At the same time, 32 healthy females with similar age distribution were enrolled to serve as the control group. The Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University approved this study (number: FAHCMU 101020), and all participants signed informed consent forms.

Cell lines and cell culture

Human breast cancer cell lines BT-483 and MCF-7 were purchased from ATCC (Manassas, USA). BT-483 cells were cultured with ATCC-formulated RPMI-1640 medium (cat. no. 30-2001; ATCC) containing 0.01 mg/mL bovine insulin and 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS). MCF-7 cells were cultured in ATCC-formulated Eagle's minimum essential medium (cat. no. 30-2003; ATCC) containing 0.01 mg/mL human recombinant insulin and 10% FBS. Cells were cultured at 37℃ and harvested during logarithmic growth phase for subsequent experiments.

Construction of SMAD family member 3- and HIF-1α-overexpressing cell lines

SMAD family member 3 (SMAD3) and HIF-1α expression vectors were constructed by inserting full-length SMAD3 (T1951; GeneCopoeia, Rockville, USA) and HIF-1α cDNA (T0096; GeneCopoeia) into pIRSE2-EGFP vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, USA). Cells were cultured overnight in Eagle's minimum essential medium (ATCC) containing 10% FBS (FBS was not added in case of chemical treatment) in an incubator (37℃, 5% CO2) to reach 80%–90% confluence. Empty vector without any insertion was used as a negative control. Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (cat. no. 11668-019; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, USA) was used to transfect 10 nM vector into 4×105 cells. After transfection, cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Hyclone; GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, USA) at 37℃ for 48 hours before subsequent experiments.

Preparation of serum samples

Fasting blood (15 mL) was extracted from both patients and healthy controls in the morning on the day of admission. Serum was separated from blood by keeping the blood at room temperature for 3 hours followed by centrifugation at 2,000 rpm for 20 minutes.

Cell proliferation assay

Cells were collected during logarithmic growth phase and cell suspension was made. Then, 100 µL of diluted cell suspension containing 4×104 cells was added to each well of a 96-well plate. Cells were cultured and 10 µL cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) was added to each well 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours later. Cells were then cultured at 37℃ for another 4 hours. A Fisherbrand™ accuSkan™ GO UV/Vis Microplate Spectrophotometer (Fisher Scientific Co., Pittsburgh, USA) was used to measure optical density (OD) values at 450 nm. All experiments were performed three times, and three wells were set for each treatment to calculate mean values.

MTT assay

Cells were collected during the logarithmic growth phase and cell suspension was prepared by diluting cells with culture medium containing 10 mM tetraethylammonium (Sigma-Aldrich) to make a final cell density of 5×104 cells/mL. One hundred microliters of cell suspension (6×103 cells) was then added to each well of a 96-well plate. Cells were cultured at 37℃ for 6 hours, and 10 µL of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was then added to each well. Following that, cells were cultured for another 4 hours, OD values were measured at 570 nm using a Fisherbrand™ accuSkan™ GO UV/Vis Microplate Spectrophotometer. Relative cell apoptosis rate was normalized to control cells.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was extracted from serum and in vitro cultured cells using Trizol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). A NanoDrop™ 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) was used to test RNA quality, and RNA samples with an A260/A280 ratio between 1.8 and 2.0 were used to synthesize cDNA through reverse transcription. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) reactions were prepared using SYBR® Green Real-Time PCR Master Mixes (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). The following primers were used: 5'-TTCACCTGAGCCTAATAGTCC-3' (forward) and 5'-CAAGTCTAAATCTGTGTCCTG-3' (reverse) for HIF-1α; 5'-GCCTGTGCTGGAACATCATC-3' (forward) and 5'-TTGCCCTCATGTGTGCTCTT-3' (reverse) for SMAD3; 5'-GACCTCTATGCCAACACAGT-3' (forward) and 5'-AGTACTTGCGCTCAGGAGGA-3' (reverse) for β-actin. PCR reaction conditions were: 95℃ for 1 minute, followed by 40 cycles of 95℃ for 12 seconds and 62℃ or 58℃ for 38 seconds. The 2−ΔΔCT method was used to process Ct values, and relative expression levels of HIF-1α and SMAD3 were normalized to endogenous control β-actin.

Western blot

Total protein was extracted from in vitro cultured cells using radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (RIPA) solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), and protein samples were quantified by bicinchoninic acid assay. Following that, 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed using 30 µg protein from each of the samples. After transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.), blocking was performed by incubating membranes with 5% skimmed milk at room temperature for 1 hour. This was followed by incubation with primary antibodies, including rabbit anti-TGF-β1 (1:2,000, ab92486; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-HIF-1α (1:2,000, ab51608; Abcam), anti-SMAD3 (1:2,000, ab40854; Abcam), and anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (1:1,000, ab8245; Abcam) overnight at 4℃. After washing with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 15 minutes, membranes were incubated with anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G-horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody (1:1,000, MBS435036; MyBioSource, San Diego, USA) at room temperature for 4 hours. Enhanced chemiluminescence (Sigma-Aldrich) was then added and signal was detected using a MYECL™ Imager (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Relative expression level of each protein was normalized to endogenous control GAPDH using Image J software.

Mouse transplantation

A total of 24 BALB/c-nu mice (20±2 g) were provided by Guangdong Medical Laboratory Animal Center (Guangzhou, China). Mice were randomly divided into three groups with eight mice in each group. One hundred microliters of matrigel (Sigma-Aldrich)/PBS mixture containing 106 MCF-7 cells, HIF-1α-overexpressing MCF-7 cells, or MCF-7 cells transfected with empty vector were subcutaneously injected into the left intercostal space of each mouse. Tumor growth was monitored from day 7 until the end of the 6th week. Slide calipers were used to measure the long diameter (L) and short diameter (W) of tumors. Tumor volume (TV) was calculated every 7 days using the following formula: TV=L×W×0.5. Mice were sacrificed 6 weeks after transplantation and tumor weight was measured.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA). The chi-square test was used to process count data. Measurement data were expressed as mean±standard deviation, and Student t-test was used for comparisons between two groups. Analysis of variance and least significant difference tests were used to compare data among multiple groups. Statistical significance was inferred where p<0.05.

RESULTS

Expression of HIF-1α messenger RNA in serum of healthy controls and patients with different stages of breast cancer

Expression of HIF-1α messenger RNA (mRNA) in serum of healthy controls and patients with different stages of breast cancer was detected by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). As shown in Figure 1, expression level of HIF-1α mRNA in serum was upregulated in patients with different stages of breast cancer compared with that in healthy controls. In addition, the expression level of HIF-1α mRNA significantly increased with increasing primary tumor stage (T1–T4). These results suggest that upregulation of HIF-1α expression is very likely to be involved in the progression of breast cancer.
Figure 1

Expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) mRNA in serum of healthy controls and patients with different stages of breast cancer.

*p<0.05.

Potential of HIF-1α mRNA in the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of HIF-1α mRNA in distinguishing breast cancer patients from healthy controls was 0.9407, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.9041–0.9774 (p<0.0001) (Figure 2A). Based on the median serum level of HIF-1α mRNA, patients were divided into high and low HIF-1α mRNA expression groups. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method based on data collected during 5-years' follow-up, which was analyzed by log-rank t-test. As shown in Figure 2B, overall survival rate of patients with a high expression level of HIF-1α mRNA in serum was significantly lower than that of patients with lower serum level of HIF-1α mRNA. These data suggest that HIF-1α mRNA expression level may provide a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer.
Figure 2

Potentials of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) mRNA in the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer. (A) Diagnostic values of serum HIF-1α mRNA for breast cancer was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. (B) Comparison of survival curves of patients with high and low serum level of HIF-1α mRNA was shown.

Effects of HIF-1α and SMAD3 on cell proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells

Overexpression of HIF-1α and SMAD3 in cell lines was validated by qRT-PCR (data not shown). Overexpression of HIF-1α and SMAD3 promoted cell proliferation in two breast cancer cell lines (Figure 3A and 3B), and the HIF-1α inhibitor chrysin (5 µM; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, USA) also promoted cell proliferation. Treatment with the SMAD3 inhibitor (SIS3) (6 µM; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) reduced cell proliferation. In addition, HIF-1α and SMAD3 overexpression significantly inhibited cell apoptosis in two breast cancer cell lines (p<0.05) (Figure 3C and 3D). Apoptosis was also significantly promoted by the HIF-1α inhibitor chrysin and by SIS3 treatment (p<0.05) (Figure 3C and 3D).
Figure 3

Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and SMAD family member 3 (SMAD3) on cell proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. (A, B) Cell proliferation of different cell lines was influenced with different treatment. (C, D) Cell apoptosis of different cell lines was influenced with different treatment.

SIS3=SMAD3 inhibitor; C=control; NC=negative control; over=overexpression. *p<0.05.

HIF-1α is a positive upstream regulator of the TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway in breast cancer

As shown in Figure 4A and 4B, HIF-1α overexpression significantly increased the expression levels of TGF-β1 and SMAD3 in two breast cancer cell lines (p<0.05). However, SMAD3 overexpression showed no significant effects on the expression of HIF-1α or TGF-β1 in these two cell lines (p<0.05) (Figure 4C and 4D). Dimethyl-bisphenol A (DBA) is an HIF inhibitor that promotes HIF-1α degradation. In our study, DBA (0.05 mM, sc-205650; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) significantly reduced the accumulation levels of HIF-1α in two cell lines (data not shown). In addition, DBA treatment significantly decreased the expression levels of TGF-β1 and SMAD3 in two cell lines (p<0.05) (Figure 5). These data suggest that HIF-1α is a positive upstream regulator of the TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway in breast cancer.
Figure 4

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) is a positive upstream regulator of transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1)/SMAD family member 3 (SMAD3) pathway in breast cancer. (A, B) HIF-1α overexpression significantly increased the expression levels of TGF-β 1 and SMAD3 in BT-483 and MCF-7 cell line. (C, D) SMAD3 overexpression showed no significant effects on the expression of HIF-1α or TGF-β 1 in BT-483 and MCF-7 cell line.

C=control; NC=negative control; over=overexpression; GAPDH=glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. *p<0.05.

Figure 5

Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor inhibitor dimethyl-bisphenol A (DBA) on transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) (A) and SMAD family member 3 (SMAD3) (B) expression.

C=control; GAPDH=glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. *p<0.05.

HIF-1α overexpression promoted growth of transplanted tumors in mice

Figure 6A shows representative tumors collected 6 weeks after the injection. Tumor volume was recorded every week from week 1 to week 6. As shown in Figure 5B, the growth of tumors derived from HIF-1α-overexpressing MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines was faster than that of tumors that derived from MCF-7 cells or MCF-7 cells transfected with empty vector (Figure 6B). In addition, weight of tumors derived from the HIF-1α-overexpressing MCF-7 breast cancer cell line was also significantly higher than that of tumors derived from MCF-7 cells or MCF-7 cells with empty vector transfection (Figure 6C). These data suggest that HIF-1α overexpression may promote breast tumor growth in vivo.
Figure 6

Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and the growth of transplanted tumor in mice. (A) Representative tumors collected at 6 week after injection was shown. (B) Tumors were derived from MCF-7 cells (control), MCF-7 cells transfected with empty vector (negative control), and HIF-1α-overexpressing MCF-7 cell lines (overexpression), and the tumor growth rate was recorded and compared. (C) Comparison of tumor weight at week 6 between tumors derived from MCF-7 cells (control), MCF-7 cells transfected with empty vector (negative control), and HIF-1α-overexpressing MCF-7 cell line (overexpression).

C=control; NC=negative control; over=overexpression. *p<0.05.

DISCUSSION

Previous work has shown that HIF-1 can regulate genes involved in a wide range of biological processes including cell survival, glucose metabolism, angiogenesis, and cell invasion, and these are all important for both the growth and the development of cancers [7]. Expression of HIF-1α, which is a subunit of HIF-1, is upregulated by intratumoral hypoxia and genetic alterations. Overexpression of HIF-1α therefore occurs during the onset, development, and progression of human malignancies [7]. In a recent study, Wang et al. [11] reported that HIF-1α is highly expressed in patients with breast cancer compared with that in healthy controls, and they showed significant correlations between HIF-1α expression and features of aggressive tumors. High expression of HIF-1α has also been seen during the development of prostate cancer, in which it is involved in regulating cancer cell invasion [12]. Other relevant work on elevated HIF-1α expression in cancer includes a study linking it with the development and progression of breast cancer in Africa [13]. Furthermore, inhibition of HIF-1α shows promise as an anticancer strategy, for example tanshinone IIA, an active ingredient of Salvia miltiorrhiza bunge, has been proved to achieve anticancer activity through inhibition of HIF-1α expression [14]. In our study, HIF-1α was found to be significantly upregulated in patients with different stages of breast cancer compared with that in healthy controls. In addition, the expression level of HIF-1α mRNA significantly increased with increasing primary tumor stage. These data provide an advance on previous work by demonstrating a correlation between HIF-1α expression level and disease progression in patients with breast cancer, since previous studies have not included tumor staging [1112]. Our study therefore provides substantial support to the hypothesis that upregulation of HIF-1α expression is involved in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. At present, the key to survival for patients with breast cancer is early diagnosis and treatment, which require highly sensitive and accurate biomarkers. Level of HIF-1α mRNA has been used previously in the diagnosis of certain types of malignancies including prostate cancer [15], and has achieved satisfactory diagnostic specificity as well as sensitivity. In addition, overexpression of HIF-1α has long been considered a marker of unfavorable prognosis in different types of malignant tumors including early-stage invasive cervical cancer [16]. In our study, ROC curve analysis showed that serum HIF-1α mRNA level can be used to accurately and effectively distinguish breast cancer patients from normal healthy controls. In addition, overall survival rate of patients with high expression levels of HIF-1α mRNA in serum was significantly lower than that of patients with lower serum level of HIF-1α mRNA. These data suggest that measurement of HIF-1α mRNA expression levels in serum may provide a reference for the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer. However, it is worth noting that overexpression of HIF-1α is observed in various other of human diseases, including lung cancer [17], and liver cancer [18], so, multiple biomarkers are required for diagnostic specificity. Understanding the mechanism of HIF-1α activity remains incomplete. It can affect multiple pathways, including glucose metabolism, to promote tumor growth and inhibit apoptosis [19]. In our study, HIF-1α overexpression promoted cell proliferation and inhibited apoptosis in two breast cancer cells lines, while HIF-1α inhibitors produced the opposite effects. We also showed that HIF-1α overexpression promoted the growth of transplanted tumors in nude mice. Involvement of the TGF-β/SMAD3 axis in the regulation of proliferation and apoptosis in breast cancer cells has been demonstrated previously [20]. In this study, SMAD3 overexpression showed similar effects on breast cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis to those of HIF-1α overexpression. It has been reported that HIF-1α activates the participation of the TGF-β/SMAD3 pathway in certain physiological processes [21]. In the present study, HIF-1α overexpression significantly increased the expression levels of TGF-β1 and SMAD3 in breast cancer cells, while SMAD3 overexpression showed no significant effects on the expression of HIF-1α or TGF-β1. These data suggest that HIF-1α is a positive upstream regulator of the TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway in breast cancer. In conclusion, increased serum levels of HIF-1α effectively distinguish breast cancer patients from healthy controls. HIF-1α may serve as an upstream regulator of the TGF-β1/SMAD3 pathway to promote the growth of breast cancer.
  21 in total

1.  Ellagic acid induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through TGF-β/Smad3 signaling pathway in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells.

Authors:  Hong-Sheng Chen; Ming-Han Bai; Tao Zhang; Guo-Dong Li; Ming Liu
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.650

2.  Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Activates the Transforming Growth Factor-β/SMAD3 Pathway in Kidney Tubular Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Natsuki Kushida; Seitaro Nomura; Imari Mimura; Takanori Fujita; Shogo Yamamoto; Masaomi Nangaku; Hiroyuki Aburatani
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.754

3.  Cancer statistics: Breast cancer in situ.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ward; Carol E DeSantis; Chun Chieh Lin; Joan L Kramer; Ahmedin Jemal; Betsy Kohler; Otis W Brawley; Ted Gansler
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Serum HIF-1alpha and VEGF levels pre- and post-TACE in patients with primary liver cancer.

Authors:  Zhong-zhi Jia; Guo-min Jiang; Yao-liang Feng
Journal:  Chin Med Sci J       Date:  2011-09

5.  Expression of HIF-1alpha, CA IX, VEGF, and MMP-9 in surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Seok Jin Kim; Zahid N Rabbani; Mark W Dewhirst; Zeljko Vujaskovic; Robin T Vollmer; Ernst-Gilbert Schreiber; Egbert Oosterwijk; Michael J Kelley
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha is a marker for an unfavorable prognosis in early-stage invasive cervical cancer.

Authors:  P Birner; M Schindl; A Obermair; C Plank; G Breitenecker; G Oberhuber
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Fatty acid uptake and lipid storage induced by HIF-1α contribute to cell growth and survival after hypoxia-reoxygenation.

Authors:  Karim Bensaad; Elena Favaro; Caroline A Lewis; Barrie Peck; Simon Lord; Jennifer M Collins; Katherine E Pinnick; Simon Wigfield; Francesca M Buffa; Ji-Liang Li; Qifeng Zhang; Michael J O Wakelam; Fredrik Karpe; Almut Schulze; Adrian L Harris
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 8.  Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Tanshinone IIA inhibits HIF-1α and VEGF expression in breast cancer cells via mTOR/p70S6K/RPS6/4E-BP1 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Guobing Li; Changyu Shan; Lei Liu; Ting Zhou; Jing Zhou; Xiaoye Hu; Yibiao Chen; Hongjuan Cui; Ning Gao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  HIF-1α and TAZ serve as reciprocal co-activators in human breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Lisha Xiang; Daniele M Gilkes; Hongxia Hu; Weibo Luo; John W Bullen; Houjie Liang; Gregg L Semenza
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-05-20
View more
  15 in total

1.  Secretome analysis reveals reduced expression of COL4A2 in hypoxic cancer-associated fibroblasts with a tumor-promoting function in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Seo-Gyu Park; Mi-Jung Ji; In-Hye Ham; Yoon-Hee Shin; Su-Min Lee; Chang Hoon Lee; Eunjung Kim; Hoon Hur; Hyun-Mee Park; Jae-Young Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.322

2.  β-Escin alleviates cobalt chloride-induced hypoxia-mediated apoptotic resistance and invasion via ROS-dependent HIF-1α/TGF-β/MMPs in A549 cells.

Authors:  Chermakani Paneerselvam; Sudhandiran Ganapasam
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Qindan Capsule Attenuates Myocardial Hypertrophy and Fibrosis in Pressure Overload-Induced Mice Involving mTOR and TGF-β1/Smad Signaling Pathway Inhibition.

Authors:  Wenwu Bai; Min Ren; Wen Cheng; Xiaoting Lu; Deshan Liu; Bo Wang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 4.  Hypoxia-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancers: HIF-1α and Beyond.

Authors:  Shing Yau Tam; Vincent W C Wu; Helen K W Law
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Pregnancy-specific glycoprotein 9 acts as both a transcriptional target and a regulator of the canonical TGF-β/Smad signaling to drive breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Ying-Ying Liu; Sa Zhang; Tian-Jian Yu; Fang-Lin Zhang; Fan Yang; Yan-Ni Huang; Ding Ma; Guang-Yu Liu; Zhi-Ming Shao; Da-Qiang Li
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

6.  Natural Killer Cell Recognition and Control of Epithelial Cancers.

Authors:  Marcelo de Souza Fernandez Pereira; David R Carr; Margaret E Gatti-Mays; Mallery R Olsen; Bhuvana A Setty; Kathryn T Shahwan; Dean A Lee
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug 01       Impact factor: 2.074

Review 7.  Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in the Light of Plasticity and Hybrid E/M States.

Authors:  Laura Bornes; Guillaume Belthier; Jacco van Rheenen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  Hypoxia, partial EMT and collective migration: Emerging culprits in metastasis.

Authors:  Kritika Saxena; Mohit Kumar Jolly; Kuppusamy Balamurugan
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Transcriptome analyses reveal molecular mechanisms underlying phenotypic differences among transcriptional subtypes of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Yuan-Bo Pan; Siqi Wang; Biao Yang; Zhenqi Jiang; Cameron Lenahan; Jianhua Wang; Jianmin Zhang; Anwen Shao
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 5.310

10.  Hypoxia-induced HIF-1α and ZEB1 are critical for the malignant transformation of ameloblastoma via TGF-β-dependent EMT.

Authors:  Shohei Yoshimoto; Fumie Tanaka; Hiromitsu Morita; Akimitsu Hiraki; Shuichi Hashimoto
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.