| Literature DB >> 30275761 |
Wenjuan Wu1,2, Wei Zhong1, Bing Lang3, Zhiping Hu1, Jialin He1, Xiangqi Tang1.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the neuroprotective effects and underpinning mechanisms of thrombopoietin (TPO), Matrix Metalloproteinase-9(MMP-9) and Nuclear Factor-κB (NF-κB) after focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Ischemia-Reperfusion (IR); Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9); Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB); Thrombopoietin (TPO)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30275761 PMCID: PMC6158660 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.27543
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Sci ISSN: 1449-1907 Impact factor: 3.738
Figure 1Effect of thrombopoietin in ischemia-reperfusion rats' brains. (A) TTC staining of brain slices after ischemia- reperfusion. Uniformly red region in Sham operation group (a) vs. white infarct lesion in IR group (b) and TPO intervention group(c). (B) Compared with sham operation group, the neurological deficit scores were significantly increased in IR and TPO intervention group, and TPO intervention decreased neurological deficit at 24h after MCAO. (C) The brain water content of ischemic hemispheres was significantly increased after MCAO, and TPO intervention reduced ischemia-induced increase of brain water content, whereas no difference was found in contralateral hemispheres. (D) The Evan's blue extravasation of ischemic hemispheres is significantly higher than that of sham group and contralateral hemispheres in IR and TPO intervention group, and TPO intervention reduced Evan's blue content significantly compared with the IR group. (★Compared with the sham operation group, P<0.05; ▲Compared with the IR group, P<0.05; ■Compared with the contralateral brain, P<0.05)
Neurological deficit score of each group (n=33,‾X ±S)
| Group | Grade |
|---|---|
| Sham operation group | 0 |
| IR group | 2.18±0.58★ |
| TPO intervention group | 1.76±0.61★▲ |
★Compared with the sham operation group, P<0.05; ▲Compared with the IR group, P<0.05
The brain water content of each group (n=6, ‾X ±S)
| Group | Ischemic hemisphere | Contralateral hemisphere |
|---|---|---|
| Sham operation group | 0.77±0.015 | 0.76±0.019 |
| IR group | 0.81±0.018 ★■ | 0.77±0.028 |
| TPO intervention group | 0.79±0.016 ★▲■ | 0.78±0.022 |
★Compared with the sham operation group, P<0.05; ▲Compared with the IR group, P<0.05.
■Compared with the contralateral brain, P<0.05
The Evan's blue content of each group (n=6, ‾X ±S, ug/g)
| Group | Ischemic hemisphere | Contralateral hemisphere |
|---|---|---|
| Sham operation group | 1.15±0.49 | 1.42±0.44 |
| IR group | 9.98±1.02★■ | 1.13±0.51 |
| TPO intervention group | 7.74±1.39★▲■ | 1.32±0.36 |
★Compared with the sham operation group, P<0.05; ▲Compared with the IR group, P<0.05
■Compared with the contralateral brain, P<0.05
Figure 2Hematoxylin-Eosin staining (A) and Immunohistochemical staining of MMP-9 (B) and NF-κB (C) in the cerebral cortex. Scale bar, 50μm. (400×magnification) There was increased MMP-9, NF-κB immunoreactivity after Ischemia-reperfusion. TPO intervention reduced MMP-9, NF-κB immunoreactivity significantly.
Number of MMP-9 and NF-κB positive cells in each group (n=6, ‾X ±S)
| Group | MMP-9 | NF-κB |
|---|---|---|
| Sham operation group | 9.31±2.96 | 7.17 ± 1.98 |
| IR group | 30.78±5.79▲ | 40.82 ± 8.73▲ |
| TPO intervention group | 22.41±4.58▲■ | 24.67 ± 6.33▲■ |
▲Compared with the sham operation group, P<0.05; ■Compared with the IR group, P<0.05
Figure 3TPO suppressed the expression of MMP-9 and NF-κB. (A, B) Western blot results showing the expressing levels of MMP-9 and NF-κB protein; (C) Number of MMP-9 and NF-κB positive cells assessed by immunohistochemistry; (D) RT-PCR results displaying the mRNA expression of MMP-9 and NF-κB. The expression of MMP-9 and NF-κB was massively increased in IR group, and TPO intervention effectively blocked the increase caused by ischemia-reperfusion. (▲Compared with the sham operation group, P<0.05; ■Compared with the IR group, P<0.05)
Relative protein level of MMP-9 and NF-κB in each group (n=6, ‾X ±S)
| Group | MMP-9 | NF-κB |
|---|---|---|
| Sham operation group | 0.17±0.059 | 0.23 ± 0.033 |
| IR group | 0.37±0.021▲ | 0.49 ± 0.099▲ |
| TPO intervention group | 0.25±0.058▲■ | 0.32 ± 0.068▲■ |
▲Compared with the sham operation group, P<0.05; ■Compared with the IR group, P<0.05
Relative mRNA expression of MMP-9 and NF-κB in each group (n=6, ‾X ±S)
| Group | MMP-9 | NF-κB |
|---|---|---|
| Sham operation group | 1 | 1 |
| IR group | 2.49±0.39▲ | 3.07 ± 0.32▲ |
| TPO intervention group | 1.52±0.30▲■ | 2.03 ± 0.49▲■ |
▲Compared with the sham operation group, P<0.05; ■Compared with the IR group, P<0.05