Literature DB >> 30275343

New Player in Endosomal Trafficking: Differential Roles of Smad Anchor for Receptor Activation (SARA) Protein.

Victoria Rozés-Salvador1,2,3,4, Sebastian O Siri5,2,3, Melina M Musri5,2,3, Cecilia Conde1,2,3.   

Abstract

The development and maintenance of multicellular organisms require specialized coordination between external cellular signals and the proteins receiving stimuli and regulating responses. A critical role in the proper functioning of these processes is played by endosomal trafficking, which enables the transport of proteins to targeted sites as well as their return to the plasma membrane through its essential components, the endosomes. During this trafficking, signaling pathways controlling functions related to the endosomal system are activated both directly and indirectly. Although there are a considerable number of molecules participating in these processes, some are more known than others for their specific functions. Toward the end of the 1990s, Smad anchor for receptor activation (SARA) protein was described to be controlling and to facilitate the localization of Smads to transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) receptors during TGF-β signaling activation, and, strikingly, SARA was also identified to be one of the proteins that bind to early endosomes (EEs) participating in membrane trafficking in several cell models. The purpose of this review is to analyze the state of the art of the contribution of SARA in different cell types and cellular contexts, focusing on the biological role of SARA in two main processes, trafficking and cellular signaling, both of which are necessary for intercellular coordination, communication, and development.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SARA; TGF-β; development; endosomal trafficking; signaling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30275343      PMCID: PMC6275186          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00446-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  100 in total

Review 1.  Rab proteins as membrane organizers.

Authors:  M Zerial; H McBride
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Endocytosis conducts the cell signaling orchestra.

Authors:  Simona Polo; Pier Paolo Di Fiore
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Cargo recognition in clathrin-mediated endocytosis.

Authors:  Linton M Traub; Juan S Bonifacino
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  Interaction between Smad anchor for receptor activation and Smad3 is not essential for TGF-beta/Smad3-mediated signaling.

Authors:  D Goto; H Nakajima; Y Mori; K Kurasawa; N Kitamura; I Iwamoto
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Altered TGF-β endocytic trafficking contributes to the increased signaling in Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  Anna-Maria Siegert; Carla Serra-Peinado; Enric Gutiérrez-Martínez; Fernando Rodríguez-Pascual; Isabel Fabregat; Gustavo Egea
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 5.187

Review 6.  Signaling Receptors for TGF-β Family Members.

Authors:  Carl-Henrik Heldin; Aristidis Moustakas
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  Kinetics of transit of transferrin and epidermal growth factor through clathrin-coated membranes.

Authors:  J A Hanover; M C Willingham; I Pastan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Rab proteins and the road maps for intracellular transport.

Authors:  K Simons; M Zerial
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  PP1 binds Sara and negatively regulates Dpp signaling in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daimark Bennett; Luke Alphey
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2002-07-22       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Rab5 GTPase inversely regulate the Smad anchor for receptor activation (SARA) protein independently of transforming growth factor-β1.

Authors:  Constance E Runyan; Zongyi Liu; H William Schnaper
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  4 in total

1.  Neuronal Polarity: Positive and Negative Feedback Signals.

Authors:  Tetsuya Takano; Yasuhiro Funahashi; Kozo Kaibuchi
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 2.  The Genomic Response to TGF-β1 Dictates Failed Repair and Progression of Fibrotic Disease in the Obstructed Kidney.

Authors:  Craig E Higgins; Jiaqi Tang; Stephen P Higgins; Cody C Gifford; Badar M Mian; David M Jones; Wenzheng Zhang; Angelica Costello; David J Conti; Rohan Samarakoon; Paul J Higgins
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-02

Review 3.  AGAP2: Modulating TGFβ1-Signaling in the Regulation of Liver Fibrosis.

Authors:  Amaia Navarro-Corcuera; Eduardo Ansorena; Cristina Montiel-Duarte; María J Iraburu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  The Molecular Genetics of Marfan Syndrome.

Authors:  Qiu Du; Dingding Zhang; Yue Zhuang; Qiongrong Xia; Taishen Wen; Haiping Jia
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.