Literature DB >> 30274986

Outcomes of idiopathic chronic large pericardial effusion.

Massimo Imazio1, George Lazaros2, Anna Valenti3, Caterina Chiara De Carlini4, Stefano Maggiolini4, Emanuele Pivetta5, Carla Giustetto1, Dimitris Tousoulis2, Yehuda Adler6, Mauro Rinaldi1, Antonio Brucato3,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aim of this paper is to evaluate the outcomes of 'idiopathic' chronic large pericardial effusions without initial evidence of pericarditis.
METHODS: All consecutive cases of idiopathic chronic large pericardial effusions evaluated from 2000 to 2015 in three Italian tertiary referral centres for pericardial diseases were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. The term 'idiopathic' was applied to cases that performed a complete diagnostic evaluation to exclude a specific aetiology. A clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed every 3-6 months.
RESULTS: 100 patients were included (mean age 61.3±14.6 years, 54 females, 44 patients were asymptomatic according to clinical evaluation) with a mean follow-up of 50 months. The baseline median size of the effusion (evaluated as the largest end-diastolic echo-free space) was 25 mm (IQR 8) and decreased to a mean value of 7 mm (IQR 19; p<0.0001) with complete regression in 39 patients at the end of follow-up. There were no new aetiological diagnoses. Adverse events were respectively: cardiac tamponade in 8 patients (8.0%), pericardiocentesis in 30 patients (30.0%), pericardial window in 12 cases (12.0%) and pericardiectomy in 3 patients (3.0%). Recurrence-free survival and complications-free survival was better in patients treated without interventions (log rank p=0.0038).
CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of 'idiopathic' chronic large pericardial effusions is usually benign with reduction of the size of the effusion in the majority of cases, and regression in about 40% of cases. The risk of cardiac tamponade is 2.2%/year and recurrence/complications survival was better in patients treated conservatively without interventions. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  echocardiography; pericardial effusion

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30274986     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  5 in total

Review 1.  Chronic massive pericardial effusion: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Ying-Shuo Huang; Jian-Xiong Zhang; Ying Sun
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.671

2.  Immunomodulating Therapies in Acute Myocarditis and Recurrent/Acute Pericarditis.

Authors:  Enrico Ammirati; Emanuele Bizzi; Giacomo Veronese; Matthieu Groh; Caroline M Van de Heyning; Jukka Lehtonen; Marc Pineton de Chambrun; Alberto Cereda; Chiara Picchi; Lucia Trotta; Javid J Moslehi; Antonio Brucato
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-03-07

3.  Acute pericarditis or a systemic disease with pleuropulmonary involvement?

Authors:  Maddalena Alessandra Wu; Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau; Silvia Maestroni; Antonio Brucato
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  New Approaches to Management of Pericardial Effusions.

Authors:  George Lazaros; Charalambos Vlachopoulos; Emilia Lazarou; Konstantinos Tsioufis
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Fifteen-year experience with pericardiectomy at a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Zainab Faiza; Anjali Prakash; Niharika Namburi; Bailey Johnson; Lava Timsina; Lawrence S Lee
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 1.637

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.