Literature DB >> 30274980

Copenhagen Prospective Personalized Oncology (CoPPO)-Clinical Utility of Using Molecular Profiling to Select Patients to Phase I Trials.

Morten Mau-Sørensen1, Finn Cilius Nielsen2, Ida Viller Tuxen1, Kristoffer Staal Rohrberg1, Olga Oestrup2, Lise Barlebo Ahlborn1,2, Ane Yde Schmidt2, Iben Spanggaard1, Jane P Hasselby3, Eric Santoni-Rugiu3, Christina Westmose Yde2, Ulrik Lassen4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the clinical benefit of tumor molecular profiling to select treatment in the phase I setting. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients with advanced solid cancers and exhausted treatment options referred to a phase I unit were included in a prospective, single-center, single-arm open-label study (NCT02290522). Tumor biopsies were obtained for comprehensive genomic analysis including whole-exome sequencing and RNA sequencing. When possible, patients were treated with regimen matched to the genomic profile. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS: From May 2013 to January 2017, a total of 591 patients were enrolled, with 500 patients undergoing biopsy. Genomic profiles were obtained in 460 patients and a potential actionable target was identified in 352 (70%) of 500 biopsied patients. A total of 101 patients (20%) received matched treatment based on either gene mutations or RNA expression levels of targets available in early clinical trials or off-label treatment. Objective response according to RECIST1.1 was observed in 15 of 101 patients (0% complete response, 15% partial response), with a median PFS of 12 weeks (95% confidence interval, 9.9-14.4).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the feasibility of genomic profiling to select patients in the phase I setting and suggests that genomic matching can be beneficial for a minor subset of patients with no other treatment options. Randomized studies may validate this assumption.See related commentary by Ratain, p. 1136. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30274980     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  17 in total

1.  The Pros and Cons of Incorporating Transcriptomics in the Age of Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Victor T G Lin; Eddy S Yang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  CPDR: An R Package of Recommending Personalized Drugs for Cancer Patients by Reversing the Individual's Disease-Related Signature.

Authors:  Ruzhen Chen; Xun Wang; Xinru Deng; Lanhui Chen; Zhongyang Liu; Dong Li
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 3.  Challenges and Obstacles in Applying Therapeutical Indications Formulated in Molecular Tumor Boards.

Authors:  Edoardo Crimini; Matteo Repetto; Paolo Tarantino; Liliana Ascione; Gabriele Antonarelli; Elena Guerini Rocco; Massimo Barberis; Luca Mazzarella; Giuseppe Curigliano
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.575

4.  Moving Molecular Profiling to Routine Clinical Practice: A Way Forward?

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Carmen J Allegra; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Adrenocortical carcinoma - towards genomics guided clinical care.

Authors:  Joakim Crona; Felix Beuschlein
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  Clinical Benefit of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Advanced Cancers in India.

Authors:  Aju Mathew; Serena Joseph; Jeffrey Boby; Steve Benny; Janeesh Veedu; Senthil Rajappa; Nitesh Rohatgi; Bhawna Sirohi; Reetu Jain; Vivek Agarwala; Deepak Kumar Shukla; Anurag Mehta; Raja Pramanik; Vineet Talwar; Vinayak Maka; Nirmal Raut
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2022-03

Review 7.  The Case for Proteomics and Phospho-Proteomics in Personalized Cancer Medicine.

Authors:  Sophia Doll; Florian Gnad; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Development of a Precision Medicine Workflow in Hematological Cancers, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.

Authors:  Julie S Bødker; Mads Sønderkær; Charles Vesteghem; Alexander Schmitz; Rasmus F Brøndum; Mia Sommer; Anne S Rytter; Marlene M Nielsen; Jakob Madsen; Paw Jensen; Inge S Pedersen; Lykke Grubach; Marianne T Severinsen; Anne S Roug; Tarec C El-Galaly; Karen Dybkær; Martin Bøgsted
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Current Status and Future Targeted Therapy in Adrenocortical Cancer.

Authors:  George Alyateem; Naris Nilubol
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 10.  Molecular Profiling-Based Precision Medicine in Cancer: A Review of Current Evidence and Challenges.

Authors:  Qi Zhang; Qihan Fu; Xueli Bai; Tingbo Liang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.