Literature DB >> 30273896

Comparing cognitive clusters across first- and multiple-episode of psychosis.

Geneviève Sauvé1, Ashok Malla2, Ridha Joober2, Mathieu B Brodeur1, Martin Lepage3.   

Abstract

Cognitive impairments in psychotic disorders (PD) present heterogeneously across patients. Between 2 and 5 clusters have been identified in previous studies with first-episode (FEP) and multiple-episodes of psychosis (MEP) patients suggesting different profiles of impairment. Past findings suggest there are differences between FEP and MEP patients regarding severity and number of affected cognitive domains. Heterogeneity of cognitive deficits in PD has perhaps hindered our understanding of their course. The present study compared non-affective FEP and MEP patients to assess whether illness chronicity could influence cognitive impairment profiles. We analyzed cognitive data, collected with the Cogstate Schizophrenia Battery, of FEP and MEP patients using cluster analysis. We compared clustering methods to obtain a more robust solution. For FEP patients, data were collected at their entry to a specialized clinic; the MEP group consisted of in- and outpatients. Results suggested cognitive heterogeneity was similar in FEP and MEP samples, although in different proportions. Three clusters were identified as the most stable solution and comprised groups of patients with either 1- no cognitive impairment (over-representation of FEP), 2- generalized deficits (over-representation of MEP), or 3- intermediate impairments. These findings encourage early interventions adapted to the profile of impairment.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster analysis; Cognitive impairment; Enduring; First-episode; Heterogeneity; Schizophrenia

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30273896     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  5 in total

Review 1.  Lifespan evolution of neurocognitive impairment in schizophrenia - A narrative review.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin J Fett; Abraham Reichenberg; Eva Velthorst
Journal:  Schizophr Res Cogn       Date:  2022-01-20

Review 2.  Remote cognitive assessment in severe mental illness: a scoping review.

Authors:  Katie M Lavigne; Geneviève Sauvé; Delphine Raucher-Chéné; Synthia Guimond; Tania Lecomte; Christopher R Bowie; Mahesh Menon; Shalini Lal; Todd S Woodward; Michael D Bodnar; Martin Lepage
Journal:  Schizophrenia (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-03-05

3.  Characterising cognitive heterogeneity in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis: a cluster analysis with clinical and functional outcome prediction.

Authors:  Kate Haining; Ruchika Gajwani; Joachim Gross; Andrew I Gumley; Robin A A Ince; Stephen M Lawrie; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Matthias Schwannauer; Peter J Uhlhaas
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  Examining the association of life course neurocognitive ability with real-world functioning in schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Sylvia Romanowska; Michael W Best; Christopher R Bowie; Colin A Depp; Thomas L Patterson; David L Penn; Amy E Pinkham; Philip D Harvey
Journal:  Schizophr Res Cogn       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 5.  A systematic review and narrative synthesis of data-driven studies in schizophrenia symptoms and cognitive deficits.

Authors:  Tesfa Dejenie Habtewold; Lyan H Rodijk; Edith J Liemburg; Grigory Sidorenkov; H Marike Boezen; Richard Bruggeman; Behrooz Z Alizadeh
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 6.222

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.