Literature DB >> 30273614

Spatial memory in young adults: Gender differences in egocentric and allocentric performance.

C Fernandez-Baizan1, J L Arias1, M Mendez2.   

Abstract

Spatial memory allows us to locate objects and organisms in space and move through the environment. We frequently use two strategies for this purpose: egocentric, related to the viewer's perspective, and allocentric, associated with environmental cues. This ability is usually assessed by 2D or virtual reality-based tasks. Gender differences have been reported on these tasks. We designed two card-placing tasks with the aim of assessing egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in a real environment. This task makes it possible to separately compare egocentric and allocentric strategies, providing participants with 3D information naturally present in daily orientation activities. We will assess the performance of male and female young adults on the two strategies. Ninety-four subjects were recruited and performed egocentric and allocentric spatial memory card placing tasks. Spatial Span, forward and backward, was also assessed using the Cambridge Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CANTAB), and the brief version of Benton's Judge of Line Orientation Test (JoLO) was used to evaluate the ability to judge spatial relations. Our results show that men outperformed women on both spatial memory tasks. Women performed better on Allocentric tasks than on Egocentric tasks, whereas men's scores did not show differences between strategies. Spatial memory performance on the card placing tasks was significantly correlated with performance on the backward visuospatial span from the CANTAB. This study supports the existence of gender differences in spatial memory functioning, and it provides novel tools for the neuropsychological assessment of spatial memory.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allocentric spatial memory; Egocentric spatial memory; Gender differences; Young adults

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30273614     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

1.  Effects of Classroom Design on the Memory of University Students: From a Gender Perspective.

Authors:  María Luisa Nolé; Juan Luis Higuera-Trujillo; Carmen Llinares
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Visuospatial performance in patients with statistically-defined mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Victor Wasserman; Sheina Emrani; Emily F Matusz; Jamie Peven; Seana Cleary; Catherine C Price; Terrie Beth Ginsberg; Rodney Swenson; Kenneth M Heilman; Melissa Lamar; David J Libon
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Decoding Spatial Memory Retrieval in Cubical Space Using fMRI Signals.

Authors:  Jiahe Guo; Kai Zhang; Jianyu Zhang; Rui Zhao; Yibo Liang; Yu Lin; Shengping Yu; Wen Qin; Xuejun Yang
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.492

4.  A Novel Training Program to Improve Human Spatial Orientation: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Michael McLaren-Gradinaru; Ford Burles; Inderpreet Dhillon; Adam Retsinas; Alberto Umiltà; Jaimy Hannah; Kira Dolhan; Giuseppe Iaria
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in typically developed children: Is spatial memory associated with visuospatial skills, behavior, and cortisol?

Authors:  Cristina Fernandez-Baizan; Paula Nuñez; Jorge L Arias; Marta Mendez
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.