Literature DB >> 30273609

Role of Residual Fragments on the Risk of Repeat Surgery after Flexible Ureteroscopy and Laser Lithotripsy: Single Center Study.

Viacheslav Iremashvili, Shuang Li, Kristina L Penniston, Sara L Best, Sean P Hedican, Stephen Y Nakada.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We analyzed the impact of residual stone fragments seen on abdominal x-ray after ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy on the risk of repeat surgical intervention.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our study included 781 patients (802 renal units) who underwent ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy with abdominal x-ray within 3 months postoperatively and who had at least 1 year of followup. Ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy were performed using the dusting technique. We analyzed the association between surgical recurrence-free survival and the size of the largest residual fragment.
RESULTS: During a median followup of 4.2 years repeat surgery was performed on 161 renal units (20%). Of the repeat interventions 75% were done for symptomatic nephrolithiasis. Postoperative imaging showed residual stone fragments in 42% of cases. In the entire group the risk of repeat surgery was increased in renal units with residual fragments greater than 2 mm. The effect of the size of residual fragments on the risk of surgical recurrence varied by patient body mass index. It was much larger in nonobese subjects, who were at increased risk for repeat surgery with residual fragments of any size. In the obese subgroup only fragments greater than 2 mm increased the risk of surgical recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: The association between the size of residual stone fragments detected by abdominal x-ray after ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy, and the risk of repeat surgical intervention depends on patient body mass index. Nonobese patients with residual stone fragments of any size are at increased risk for repeat intervention compared to those with a negative abdominal x-ray. The predictive value of abdominal x-ray after ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy is limited in obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30273609     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.09.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Re-Treatment after Ureteroscopy and Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Population Based Comparative Effectiveness Study.

Authors:  Diana K Bowen; Lihai Song; Jen Faerber; John Kim; Charles D Scales; Gregory E Tasian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Ultramini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of 10-30 mm calculi: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Soumendra N Datta; Ramandeep S Chalokia; K W Wing; K Patel; R Solanki; Janak Desai
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Is physical therapy effective following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Linjie Peng; Junjun Wen; Wen Zhong; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.264

4.  Feasibility of dusting and pop-dusting using high-power (100W) Holmium YAG (Ho:YAG) laser in treatment of paediatric stones: results of first worldwide clincial study.

Authors:  Thomas Reeves; Stephen Griffin; Amelia Pietropaolo; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-09-26

5.  Ningmitai capsule promotes calculi expulsion after RIRS for 10-20-mm upper urinary stones: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ruofan Wang; Qingdong Qiao; Dengke Yang; Jianguo Zhang; Chaoyang Zhu; Jiantao Sun; Zhongling Dou; Xiaofu Wang; Huiming Zhang; Wenhao Wang; Fei Xiao; Hepeng Cheng; Wenwei Lv; Bo Zhou; Xiaofan Zhang; Wuxue Li; Xinghua Zhao; Bin Hao; Changbao Xu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Comparative effectiveness of paediatric kidney stone surgery (the PKIDS trial): study protocol for a patient-centred pragmatic clinical trial.

Authors:  Jonathan S Ellison; Matthew Lorenzo; Hunter Beck; Ruth Beck; David I Chu; Christopher Forrest; Jing Huang; Amy Kratchman; Anna Kurth; Laura Kurth; Michael Kurtz; Thomas Lendvay; Renae Sturm; Gregory Tasian
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  A retrospective study comparing super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of 20-30 mm renal stones in obese patients.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Rijin Song; Pei Lu; Minjun Jiang; Guohua Zeng; Wei Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  The Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients with Cystine Stones: A Single-Center Experience for 13 Years.

Authors:  Toshifumi Takahashi; Shinya Somiya; Katsuhiro Ito; Toru Kanno; Yoshihito Higashi; Hitoshi Yamada
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.