Literature DB >> 30273121

Sox enters the picture.

Felix Kaufholz1, Natascha Turetzek2.   

Abstract

The discovery of a gene that regulates two segmentation mechanisms in spider embryos is fueling the ongoing debate about the evolution of this crucial developmental process.
© 2018, Kaufholz et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  development; developmental biology; evolution; evolution of segmentation; evolutionary biology; parasteatoda tepidariorum; segmentation; spider

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30273121      PMCID: PMC6167050          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.41136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


Related research article Paese CLB, Schoenauer A, Leite DJ, Russell S, McGregor AP. 2018. A SoxB gene acts as an anterior gap gene and regulates posterior segment addition in a spider. eLife 7:e37567. doi: 10.7554/eLife.37567 It is usually assumed that humans have little in common with arthropods, such as insects and spiders, or annelids such as worms. However, the body plans of vertebrates, arthropods and annelids share a striking feature: the body is subdivided into distinct segments (pink dot, Figure 1A), and scientists have been asking "is segmentation evolutionarily conserved?" for more than a century.
Figure 1.

The evolution of segmentation.

(A) Schematic representation of the phylogenetic relationships of bilaterians (adapted from Peel and Akam, 2003). Although vertebrates, arthropods, and annelids all have a segmented anterior-posterior body axis (pink dots), they are all closely related to phyla that are not segmented. Some conserved gene families (including Sox and Wnt) were already present before the emergence of the bilaterians (green dot) and are involved in many important developmental processes: some are also known to be involved in segmentation in various animals. However, the evolution of segmentation is still under debate. It could have evolved once in the 'urbilateria' (black dot), the last common ancestor of all bilaterians, or twice – at the base of the vertebrates and independently at the base of the protostomes (grey dots). Both of these scenarios would suggest a subsequent loss of segmentation in all closely related unsegmented phyla. The third scenario is that segmentation independently evolved three times – at the base of the vertebrates, arthropods, and annelids (pink dots). (B) Schematic representation of the germband and related adult tissues of the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum (adapted from Paese et al., 2018). The body of a spider embryo is comprised of the prosoma (including the head (grey) and thorax (violet and indigo) and the opisthsoma (green). The formation of the leg-bearing prosomal segments (L1–L4) depends on the gap-like functions of genes such as Distal-less (Dll), hairy (h), hunchback (hb) and, as now shown by Paese et al., Sox21b-1. The opisthosomal segments are added sequentially by a segment addition zone (SAZ, dark green) controlled by a complex gene regulatory network (dark green box), probably induced by Sox21b-1, that contains caudal (cad) and components of the Wnt (Wnt8) and Notch (Delta) signaling pathways. Ch: Cheliceral segment. Pp: Pedipalpal segment. Dl: Delta.

The evolution of segmentation.

(A) Schematic representation of the phylogenetic relationships of bilaterians (adapted from Peel and Akam, 2003). Although vertebrates, arthropods, and annelids all have a segmented anterior-posterior body axis (pink dots), they are all closely related to phyla that are not segmented. Some conserved gene families (including Sox and Wnt) were already present before the emergence of the bilaterians (green dot) and are involved in many important developmental processes: some are also known to be involved in segmentation in various animals. However, the evolution of segmentation is still under debate. It could have evolved once in the 'urbilateria' (black dot), the last common ancestor of all bilaterians, or twice – at the base of the vertebrates and independently at the base of the protostomes (grey dots). Both of these scenarios would suggest a subsequent loss of segmentation in all closely related unsegmented phyla. The third scenario is that segmentation independently evolved three times – at the base of the vertebrates, arthropods, and annelids (pink dots). (B) Schematic representation of the germband and related adult tissues of the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum (adapted from Paese et al., 2018). The body of a spider embryo is comprised of the prosoma (including the head (grey) and thorax (violet and indigo) and the opisthsoma (green). The formation of the leg-bearing prosomal segments (L1–L4) depends on the gap-like functions of genes such as Distal-less (Dll), hairy (h), hunchback (hb) and, as now shown by Paese et al., Sox21b-1. The opisthosomal segments are added sequentially by a segment addition zone (SAZ, dark green) controlled by a complex gene regulatory network (dark green box), probably induced by Sox21b-1, that contains caudal (cad) and components of the Wnt (Wnt8) and Notch (Delta) signaling pathways. Ch: Cheliceral segment. Pp: Pedipalpal segment. Dl: Delta. In vertebrate embryos, segments are added progressively along the body axis from the anterior (head) to the posterior (tail). This process involves oscillating patterns of gene expression in the posterior of the organism, including widely conserved genes that code for proteins like caudal and components of the well-known Notch and Wnt signaling pathways. In the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster, on the other hand, the segments are formed almost simultaneously early during embryonic development following a complex cascade of gene interactions, in a process known as long-germband segmentation. Maternally-provided factors, such as caudal, induce gap genes, which subsequently control the expression of pair-rule genes and, finally, segment-polarity genes (including a Wnt homolog). The end result is the formation of a molecular pre-pattern for segmentation. For many years these morphological and genetic differences were considered as strong evidence that segmentation does not have a common origin. However, other arthropods employ an approach called short-germband segmentation that is, at least morphologically, more similar to the approach taken by vertebrates. In short-germband segmentation a small number of anterior segments are defined more or less simultaneously by gap (or gap-like) genes, while the remaining segments are added sequentially to the posterior by the 'segment addition zone' (Figure 1B). A revolution in the field of evolutionary developmental biology was triggered in 2003 when researchers demonstrated that the segment addition zone in spider embryos depends on Notch signaling, as it does in vertebrates (Stollewerk et al., 2003). Additional comparative studies in spiders, insects and other arthropods revealed that short-germband segmentation with a segment addition zone depending on caudal, Notch and Wnt signaling, probably represents the ancestral mode of patterning in arthropods, whereas the genetic cascade in long-germband insects represents a derived state. Recent studies, however, revealed even deeper similarities than previously thought among the complex genetic mechanisms underlying long- and short-germband segmentation. These included a more detailed analysis of gene expression dynamics and regulation in D. melanogaster and the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Clark and Akam, 2016; Clark and Peel, 2018; Zhu et al., 2017) and the discovery of oscillatory gene expression dynamics in long-germband insects (Verd et al., 2018). Now, in eLife, Alistair McGregor and co-workers at Oxford Brookes University and Cambridge University – including Christian Paese of Oxford Brookes as first author – report another piece of evidence for this deeper level of conservation of segmentation by showing that a gene called Sox21b-1 is involved in segmentation in the spider Parasteatoda tepidariorum (Paese et al., 2018). P. tepidariorum has emerged as a model system in which to study the influences of whole genome duplications on development in arthropods (Schwager et al., 2017). Sox21b-1 belongs to the B group of the Sox family of transcription factors, which are present in all metazoan species. In arthropods the SoxB group is comprised of SoxNeuro, Sox21a, Sox21b and Dichaete. Although the evolution of arthropod SoxB genes is not fully resolved yet, Sox21b and Dichaete are closely related and probably arose by duplication in the last common ancestor of the arthropods, while in onychophorans (velvet worms), the sister group to arthropods, only one Dichaete/Sox21b class gene seems to be present (Janssen et al., 2018). In the current study Paese et al. demonstrate that Sox21b underwent a second round of duplication in spiders, probably during a whole genome duplication event (Schwager et al., 2017), giving rise to the two paralogs: Sox21b-1 and Sox21b-2. Using RNA interference Paese et al. found that a knockdown of the Sox21b-1 paralog resulted in both the loss of leg-bearing prosomal segments and opisthosomal segments, including loss of the entire segment addition zone (Figure 1B). In severe cases, even proper formation of the germband itself was disrupted. The researchers also explored where Sox21b-1 is located in the genetic cascade that controls segmentation in the spider (Schönauer et al., 2016). They found that in addition to acting as a gap-like gene in the prosoma, Sox21b-1 also regulates the expression of another gap-like gene and of many genes (including caudal and components of the Wnt and Notch signaling pathways) that are required to set up the segment addition zone in the opisthosoma. These findings are striking for many reasons. Sox genes are known to be involved in segmentation, and to interact with Wnt genes, in both insects and vertebrates (Clark and Peel, 2018; Javali et al., 2017; Mukherjee et al., 2000; Russell et al., 1996). Moreover, both the Sox and Wnt gene families belong to the ancient gene repertoire of all bilaterians and have experienced multiple duplication events during evolution. Dichaete is known to control the expression of pair-rule genes in D. melanogaster (Russell et al., 1996), but relatively little is known about Sox21b. More recent studies in T. castaneum demonstrated that both Dichaete and Sox21b are expressed in the segment addition zone (Clark and Peel, 2018; Janssen et al., 2018), which suggests that the role of SoxB genes in segmentation is conserved for long- and short- germband species. Expression ofSoxB and Wnt genes has also been found in the most posterior part of velvet worm embryos (Hogvall et al., 2014; Janssen et al., 2018). Together with the latest results from the spider, this provides further support for a conserved genetic basis (involving homologs of SoxB and Wnt genes) for the different segmentation modes of arthropods. The astonishing results reported by Paese et al. highlight once again how far we are from a complete understanding of segmentation. It also underlines the need for further comparative studies in various species, focusing on conserved gene families, especially after duplication events, to determine if segmentation evolved anciently or independently in the three segmented bilaterian lineages (pink dot, Figure 1A). Techniques like RNA interference, CRISPR/Cas9 and new sequencing methods, together with an increasing number of genomes and transcriptomes available for emerging model organisms, will hopefully help to answer this question.
  14 in total

1.  Involvement of Notch and Delta genes in spider segmentation.

Authors:  Angelika Stollewerk; Michael Schoppmeier; Wim G M Damen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evolution of segmentation: rolling back the clock.

Authors:  Andrew Peel; Michael Akam
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Odd-paired controls frequency doubling in Drosophila segmentation by altering the pair-rule gene regulatory network.

Authors:  Erik Clark; Michael Akam
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Co-expression of Tbx6 and Sox2 identifies a novel transient neuromesoderm progenitor cell state.

Authors:  Alok Javali; Aritra Misra; Karolis Leonavicius; Debalina Acharyya; Bhakti Vyas; Ramkumar Sambasivan
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  The Dichaete gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes a SOX-domain protein required for embryonic segmentation.

Authors:  S R Russell; N Sanchez-Soriano; C R Wright; M Ashburner
Journal:  Development       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  The house spider genome reveals an ancient whole-genome duplication during arachnid evolution.

Authors:  Evelyn E Schwager; Prashant P Sharma; Thomas Clarke; Daniel J Leite; Torsten Wierschin; Matthias Pechmann; Yasuko Akiyama-Oda; Lauren Esposito; Jesper Bechsgaard; Trine Bilde; Alexandra D Buffry; Hsu Chao; Huyen Dinh; HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni; Shannon Dugan; Cornelius Eibner; Cassandra G Extavour; Peter Funch; Jessica Garb; Luis B Gonzalez; Vanessa L Gonzalez; Sam Griffiths-Jones; Yi Han; Cheryl Hayashi; Maarten Hilbrant; Daniel S T Hughes; Ralf Janssen; Sandra L Lee; Ignacio Maeso; Shwetha C Murali; Donna M Muzny; Rodrigo Nunes da Fonseca; Christian L B Paese; Jiaxin Qu; Matthew Ronshaugen; Christoph Schomburg; Anna Schönauer; Angelika Stollewerk; Montserrat Torres-Oliva; Natascha Turetzek; Bram Vanthournout; John H Werren; Carsten Wolff; Kim C Worley; Gregor Bucher; Richard A Gibbs; Jonathan Coddington; Hiroki Oda; Mario Stanke; Nadia A Ayoub; Nikola-Michael Prpic; Jean-François Flot; Nico Posnien; Stephen Richards; Alistair P McGregor
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Embryonic expression patterns and phylogenetic analysis of panarthropod sox genes: insight into nervous system development, segmentation and gonadogenesis.

Authors:  Ralf Janssen; Emil Andersson; Ellinor Betnér; Sifra Bijl; Will Fowler; Lars Höök; Jake Leyhr; Alexander Mannelqvist; Virginia Panara; Kate Smith; Sydney Tiemann
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  A SoxB gene acts as an anterior gap gene and regulates posterior segment addition in a spider.

Authors:  Christian Louis Bonatto Paese; Anna Schoenauer; Daniel J Leite; Steven Russell; Alistair P McGregor
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Analysis of the Wnt gene repertoire in an onychophoran provides new insights into the evolution of segmentation.

Authors:  Mattias Hogvall; Anna Schönauer; Graham E Budd; Alistair P McGregor; Nico Posnien; Ralf Janssen
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  A damped oscillator imposes temporal order on posterior gap gene expression in Drosophila.

Authors:  Berta Verd; Erik Clark; Karl R Wotton; Hilde Janssens; Eva Jiménez-Guri; Anton Crombach; Johannes Jaeger
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  1 in total

1.  Embryonic development and secondary axis induction in the Brazilian white knee tarantula Acanthoscurria geniculata, C. L. Koch, 1841 (Araneae; Mygalomorphae; Theraphosidae).

Authors:  Matthias Pechmann
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 0.900

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.