Literature DB >> 30273009

Sex Differences on the Landing Error Scoring System Among Individuals With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Christopher M Kuenze1,2, Stephanie Trigsted3, Caroline Lisee1, Eric Post3, David R Bell3,4.   

Abstract

CONTEXT:: After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), women have a greater risk of incurring a second anterior cruciate ligament injury and they display different landing movement patterns than men. It remains unclear if clinical movement-assessment tools, such as the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), can detect sex differences in movement patterns after ACLR.
OBJECTIVE: : To compare total LESS scores and individual LESS errors between men and women with a history of ACLR.
DESIGN: : Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: : Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS:: A total of 168 individuals (41 men and 127 women; mean age: men = 20 years [range, 19-25 years], women = 19 years [range, 18-20 years]; mean time since surgery: men = 21 months [range, 12-36 months], women = 27.5 months [range, 17-39 months]) with a history of primary, unilateral ACLR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):: Participants completed a minimum of 3 trials of a drop vertical-jump task scored using the LESS. The between-sexes difference in LESS score was assessed using analysis of covariance, whereas the associations between participant sex and errors on each LESS item were assessed using logistic or multinomial regression.
RESULTS: : Women displayed a greater number of total landing errors (men = 4.6 ± 2.3, women = 6.1 ± 2.3; P < .001) and were more likely to commit errors in trunk flexion at initial contact (men = 4.9%, women = 23.6%; odds ratio [OR] = 4.94), medial knee position at initial contact (men = 17.1%, women = 42.5%; OR = 6.01), medial knee displacement (men = 24.4%, women = 73.2%; OR = 7.88), total joint displacement (1 error: men = 58.5%, women = 71.7%, OR = 2.10; 2 errors: men = 7.3%, women = 14.2%, OR = 3.71), and overall impression (1 error: men = 75.6%, women = 84.3%, OR = 3.24; 2 errors: men = 2.4%, women = 10.2%, OR = 12.89) compared with men.
CONCLUSIONS: : Women with ACLR displayed worse LESS scores and were more likely to commit errors related to medial knee displacement and overall landing quality than men with ACLR.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drop-jump landing; movement quality; return to sport

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30273009      PMCID: PMC6208307          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-459-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  30 in total

1.  Landing adaptations after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael J Decker; Michael R Torry; Thomas J Noonan; Amy Riviere; William I Sterett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Hip and knee joint kinematics during a diagonal jump landing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed females.

Authors:  Eamonn Delahunt; Anna Prendiville; Lauren Sweeney; Mark Chawke; Judy Kelleher; Matt Patterson; Katie Murphy
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.368

3.  Effects of sex on compensatory landing strategies upon return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt; Kevin R Ford; Mitchell J Rauh; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Prediction of Future Injury in Sport: Primary and Secondary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk and Return to Sport as a Model.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Among Adolescent Females in the United States, 2002 Through 2014.

Authors:  Mackenzie M Herzog; Stephen W Marshall; Jennifer L Lund; Virginia Pate; Christina D Mack; Jeffrey T Spang
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.193

6.  Altered landing mechanics in ACL-reconstructed patients.

Authors:  Kai Daniel Oberländer; Gert-Peter Brüggemann; Jürgen Höher; Kiros Karamanidis
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Fifteen-Year Survival of Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Aged 18 Years and Younger.

Authors:  Matthew D Morgan; Lucy J Salmon; Alison Waller; Justin P Roe; Leo A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Lower extremity compensatory neuromuscular and biomechanical adaptations 2 to 11 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  John Nyland; Scott Klein; David N M Caborn
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Strength Asymmetry and Landing Mechanics at Return to Sport after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Laura C Schmitt; Mark V Paterno; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later.

Authors:  Karen K Briggs; Jack Lysholm; Yelverton Tegner; William G Rodkey; Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  6 in total

1.  Return to Sport Composite Test After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (K-STARTS): Factors Affecting Return to Sport Test Score in a Retrospective Analysis of 676 Patients.

Authors:  Florent Franck; Adnan Saithna; Thais Dutra Vieira; Charles Pioger; Gregory Vigne; Meven Le Guen; Isabelle Rogowski; Jean-Marie Fayard; Mathieu Thaunat; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.843

2.  A Comparison of Psychological Readiness and Patient-Reported Function Between Sexes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher Kuenze; David Robert Bell; Terry L Grindstaff; Caroline Michele Lisee; Thomas Birchmeier; Ashley Triplett; Brian Pietrosimone
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 3.  Disparities in ACL Reconstruction: the Influence of Gender and Race on Incidence, Treatment, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Sai K Devana; Carlos Solorzano; Benedict Nwachukwu; Kristofer J Jones
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 4.  Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anthony C Mok; Andrew J Fancher; Matthew L Vopat; Jordan Baker; Armin Tarakemeh; Scott Mullen; John P Schroeppel; Kim Templeton; Mary K Mulcahey; Bryan G Vopat
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-02-23

5.  Are Elite Collegiate Female Athletes PRIME for a Safe Return to Sport after ACLR? An Investigation of Physical Readiness and Integrated Movement Efficiency (PRIME).

Authors:  Courtney R Chaaban; Darren Hearn; Benjamin Goerger; Darin A Padua
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2022-04-01

6.  Sex differences in postural orientation errors and association with objective and patient-reported function in patients with ACL injury: an exploratory cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Jenny Nae; Mark W Creaby; Anna Cronström; Eva Ageberg
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-05-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.