Xinyin Xu1,2, Xianping Wu2, Ying Deng2, Kui Ji2, Yichong Li3, Xiaohua Liang4, Xiaofang Chen2, Jing Zeng2, Zhuo Wang2, Guanghui Yi2, Jinyao Chen1, Lishi Zhang5. 1. Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China. 2. Sichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Sichuan, China. 3. Peking University Clinical Research Institute, Beijing, China. 4. Children's Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 5. Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China. lishizhang_56@163.com; xinyinkayla@qq.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the updated prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults in West China and the influence of diet and behaviour on metabolic syndrome. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 2013-2014, and multi-stage stratified clustering sampling was applied in 12 counties of Sichuan province. Data regarding metabolic syndrome and style risk factors were collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires, and physical measurements were recorded following a standardized protocol. Logistic regression models were used to explore the association between metabolic syndrome and its risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 7,131 adults participated. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 16.9% and 23.8% according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria and the consensus definition, respectively. The International Diabetes Federation criteria failed to identify 28.8% of the participants identified by the consensus definition. The odds ratios (ORs) of suffering from Metabolic syndrome in people eating pork every week compared with at lower frequencies, people eating more than 100 g of red meat/day, people with more sedentary behaviour per day, and people consuming at least 20 cigarettes/day were 1.76 (1.09-2.84), 1.28 (1.01- 1.62), 1.03 (0.99-1.07), and 1.46 (1.12-1.92), respectively, according to the consensus definition, and 1.51 (1.09- 2.10), 1.4 (1.14-1.72), 1.07 (1.02-1.13), and 1.5 (1.16-1.94), respectively, based on the International Diabetes Federation criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The International Diabetes Federation criteria were less sensitive in identifying metabolic syndrome than the consensus definition. More sedentary behaviour, smoking >=20 cigarettes per day, and a higher frequency of pork intake increased the risk of metabolic syndrome in this study.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the updated prevalence of metabolic syndrome among adults in West China and the influence of diet and behaviour on metabolic syndrome. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from 2013-2014, and multi-stage stratified clustering sampling was applied in 12 counties of Sichuan province. Data regarding metabolic syndrome and style risk factors were collected through interviewer-administered questionnaires, and physical measurements were recorded following a standardized protocol. Logistic regression models were used to explore the association between metabolic syndrome and its risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 7,131 adults participated. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was 16.9% and 23.8% according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria and the consensus definition, respectively. The International Diabetes Federation criteria failed to identify 28.8% of the participants identified by the consensus definition. The odds ratios (ORs) of suffering from Metabolic syndrome in people eating pork every week compared with at lower frequencies, people eating more than 100 g of red meat/day, people with more sedentary behaviour per day, and people consuming at least 20 cigarettes/day were 1.76 (1.09-2.84), 1.28 (1.01- 1.62), 1.03 (0.99-1.07), and 1.46 (1.12-1.92), respectively, according to the consensus definition, and 1.51 (1.09- 2.10), 1.4 (1.14-1.72), 1.07 (1.02-1.13), and 1.5 (1.16-1.94), respectively, based on the International Diabetes Federation criteria. CONCLUSIONS: The International Diabetes Federation criteria were less sensitive in identifying metabolic syndrome than the consensus definition. More sedentary behaviour, smoking >=20 cigarettes per day, and a higher frequency of pork intake increased the risk of metabolic syndrome in this study.