Literature DB >> 30272788

Response of Soil Surface Greenhouse Gas Fluxes to Crop Residue Removal and Cover Crops under a Corn-Soybean Rotation.

Brianna R Wegner, Kopila Subedi Chalise, Shikha Singh, Liming Lai, Gandura Omar Abagandura, Sandeep Kumar, Shannon L Osborne, R Michael Lehman, Sindhu Jagadamma.   

Abstract

Excessive crop residue returned to the soil hinders farm operations, but residue removal can affect soil quality. In contrast, cover cropping can return additional residue to the soil and improve soils and environmental quality compared with no cover cropping. Residue and cover crop impacts on soil surface greenhouses gas (GHG) emissions are undetermined and site specific. Thus, the present study was conducted to investigate the impacts of corn ( L.) residue management and cover cropping on GHG fluxes. The fluxes were measured from 2013 to 2015 using static chamber under corn and soybean [ (L.) Merr.] rotation initiated in 2000 at Brookings, SD. Treatments included two residue management levels (residue returned [RR] and residue not returned [RNR]) and two cover cropping (cover crops [CC] and no cover crops [NCC]). Results showed that RR under corn and soybean phases significantly reduced cumulative CO fluxes (2681.3 kg ha in corn and 2419.8 kg ha in soybeans) compared with RNR (3331.0 kg ha in corn and 2755.0 kg ha in soybeans) in 2013. The RR emitted significantly less cumulative NO fluxes than RNR from both the phases in 2013 and 2014, but not in 2015. The CC treatment had significantly lower cumulative NO fluxes than the NCC for corn and soybean phases in 2013 and 2014. We conclude that crop residue retention and cover cropping can mitigate the GHG emissions compared with residue removal and no cover cropping.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30272788     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2018.03.0093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  5 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of Soil Microbial Community Structure and Biomass to Mitigate Soil Greenhouse Gas Emission.

Authors:  Ihsan Muhammad; Ju Zhi Lv; Jun Wang; Shakeel Ahmad; Saqib Farooq; Shamsher Ali; Xun Bo Zhou
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Impacts of crop rotational diversity and grazing under integrated crop-livestock system on soil surface greenhouse gas fluxes.

Authors:  Gandura Omar Abagandura; Songul Şentürklü; Navdeep Singh; Sandeep Kumar; Douglas G Landblom; Kris Ringwall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Intercropping kura clover with prairie cordgrass mitigates soil greenhouse gas fluxes.

Authors:  Gandura Omar Abagandura; Udayakumar Sekaran; Shikha Singh; Jasdeep Singh; Mostafa A Ibrahim; Senthil Subramanian; Vance N Owens; Sandeep Kumar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Soil organic carbon cycling in response to simulated soil moisture variation under field conditions.

Authors:  Shikha Singh; Melanie A Mayes; Avat Shekoofa; Stephanie N Kivlin; Sangeeta Bansal; Sindhu Jagadamma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Management Strategies to Mitigate N2O Emissions in Agriculture.

Authors:  Muhammad Umair Hassan; Muhammad Aamer; Athar Mahmood; Masood Iqbal Awan; Lorenzo Barbanti; Mahmoud F Seleiman; Ghous Bakhsh; Hiba M Alkharabsheh; Emre Babur; Jinhua Shao; Adnan Rasheed; Guoqin Huang
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.