| Literature DB >> 30272570 |
Waqar M Ahmed1, Paul Brinkman, Hans Weda, Hugo H Knobel, Yun Xu, Tamara M Nijsen, Royston Goodacre, Nicholas Rattray, Teunis J Vink, Marco Santonico, Giorgio Pennazza, Paolo Montuschi, Peter J Sterk, Stephen J Fowler.
Abstract
Methods for breath sampling and analysis require robust quality assessment to minimise the risk of false discoveries. Planning large-scale multi-site breath metabolite profiling studies also requires careful consideration of systematic and random variation as a result of sampling and analysis techniques. In this study we use breath sample data from the recent U-BIOPRED cohort to evaluate and discuss some important methodological considerations such as batch variation and correction, variation between sites, storage and transportation, as well as inter-instrument analytical differences. Based on this we provide a summary of recommended best practices for new large scale multi-site studies.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30272570 DOI: 10.1088/1752-7163/aae557
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Breath Res ISSN: 1752-7155 Impact factor: 3.262