| Literature DB >> 30271854 |
Kazuto Hoshi1,2, Yuko Fujihara1, Hideto Saijo1, Kumiko Kurabayashi1, Hideyuki Suenaga1, Yukiyo Asawa2, Satoru Nishizawa3, Sanshiro Kanazawa2, Sakura Uto2, Ryoko Inaki2, Mariko Matsuyama2, Tomoaki Sakamoto2, Makoto Watanabe2, Madoka Sugiyama1, Kazumichi Yonenaga1, Atsuhiko Hikita2, Tsuyoshi Takato1,2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We have developed an implant-type tissue-engineered cartilage using a poly-l-lactide scaffold. In a clinical study, it was inserted into subcutaneous areas of nasal dorsum in three patients, to correct cleft lip-nose deformity. The aim of this study was to helping evaluation on the efficacy of the regenerative cartilage.Entities:
Keywords: Cartilage; Cleft lip and palate; Nose; Three dimension; Tissue engineering
Year: 2017 PMID: 30271854 PMCID: PMC6147373 DOI: 10.1016/j.reth.2017.09.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regen Ther ISSN: 2352-3204 Impact factor: 3.419
Fig. 1Implant-type tissue-engineered cartilage. The tissue-engineered cartilage was dome-shaped with 5 cm long, 6 mm wide and 3 mm thick (a). It was carefully inserted into the nasal dorsum (b).
Fig. 2Facial changes of patient #1. The shape of nose was improved (top), while the changes of 3D CT images were not detected (bottom).
Fig. 3Facial changes of patient #2. The transplantation of tissue-engineered cartilage and a lip with flap resulted in an improved nose shape (top). Prominent changes were not observed in 3D CT images (bottom).
Fig. 4Facial changes of patient #3. The nasal shape was improved (top), although some calcification was noted in the areas of tissue-engineered cartilage, postsurgery (bottom, arrow).
Fig. 5Color mapping of surface distance between pre- and post-surgery in patient #1.
Fig. 6Color mapping of surface distance between pre- and post-surgery in patient #2.
Fig. 7Color mapping of surface distance between pre- and post-surgery in patient #3.
Fig. 8MRI images of patient #1. T1 and fat suppressive T2 (fsT2) images in axial view.
Fig. 9MRI images of patient #2. T1 and T2 images in sagittal view.
Fig. 10MRI images of patient #3. T1 and T2 images in sagittal view.